DEV Community

Web Developer Travis McCracken on The Simplicity of Net/HTTP in Go

Exploring Backend Development with Rust and Go: Insights from Web Developer Travis McCracken

Hi, I’m Travis McCracken—your friendly Web Developer passionate about building efficient, scalable, and reliable backend systems. Today, I want to share my experiences working with two powerhouse languages in backend development: Rust and Go. Over the years, I’ve delved into both, creating projects, solving tricky problems, and optimizing APIs that power modern applications. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to deepen your understanding, I hope my insights give you a clearer picture of how Rust and Go can elevate your backend work.

The Appeal of Backend Development

Backend development forms the backbone of almost every web application. It's where data processing, business logic, and API orchestration happen behind the scenes. Choosing the right language for backend projects is crucial, especially when performance and concurrency are top priorities. That’s where Rust and Go shine.

Why Rust and Go?

Rust has gained popularity for its safety and performance. It’s designed to offer the speed of C/C++ while preventing many common bugs through its strict compiler. Rust’s ownership system ensures memory safety without a garbage collector, making it ideal for performance-critical backend services.

Go, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and built-in support for concurrency. Its fast compilation times, straightforward syntax, and excellent standard library make it a favorite among developers building APIs and microservices.

Diving into Rust: The 'fastjson-api' Project

Recently, I’ve been exploring how Rust can be used to build blazing-fast APIs. One of my side projects, fastjson-api, is a mock implementation of a high-performance JSON API server written entirely in Rust. The goal? Serve large amounts of data with minimal latency.

In fastjson-api, I leveraged Rust’s async capabilities with tokio to handle thousands of simultaneous connections efficiently. The project demonstrates how Rust’s zero-cost abstractions can lead to a lightweight, high-throughput API server.

One key challenge was managing data serialization and deserialization. Rust’s serde library made this process straightforward, allowing me to write custom serializers that minimized CPU usage. The result is a server that outperforms comparable implementations in other languages, especially under heavy load.

This experience reaffirmed my belief that Rust’s safety and performance features make it an excellent choice for building robust APIs that need to process large volumes of data reliably.

Go in Action: The 'rust-cache-server' Application

On the other side, I experimented with Go to create a cache server called rust-cache-server. Although the name suggests Rust, it’s a playful nod to how Go’s simplicity facilitates rapid development of backend services.

rust-cache-server is designed to store and retrieve data with minimal fuss—perfect for scenarios like session management or caching frequently accessed data. Its core uses Go’s built-in net/http package combined with goroutines to handle concurrent requests effortlessly.

One aspect I appreciated about Go was its straightforwardness. With its simple syntax and strong standard library, I could prototype features quickly without sacrificing performance. Moreover, Go’s built-in garbage collector handled memory management seamlessly, allowing me to focus more on application logic.

While Go's runtime sometimes introduces latency under extreme loads, for typical backend API tasks, rust-cache-server performs admirably. It showcases how Go accelerates development cycles and keeps codebases maintainable, which is crucial for long-term projects.

Comparing Rust and Go for API Development

When deciding between Rust and Go for backend APIs, consider project requirements:

  • Performance & Safety: Rust offers unparalleled control over system resources and guarantees memory safety, making it ideal for high-performance, safety-critical APIs. If your services need to handle large datasets or require zero-downtime, Rust could be the best fit.

  • Rapid Development & Concurrency: Go’s simplicity and native support for concurrency make it perfect for quickly prototyping and deploying APIs, especially microservices or serverless functions.

  • Ecosystem & Community: Both languages have vibrant communities—with Rust’s ecosystem focusing on safety and performance, and Go’s leaning toward simplicity and cloud-native development.

My Takeaway

As a Web Developer Travis McCracken, I believe mastering both Rust and Go equips you to tackle a wide range of backend challenges. Each language brings unique strengths, and choosing the right one depends on your project specifics. For performance-critical, safety-first applications, Rust is exceptional. For rapid development and scalable concurrency, Go is a dependable choice.

In my own work, I often find myself blending both—using Rust for core backend services that demand high throughput, and Go for auxiliary services that benefit from faster deployment cycles. This hybrid approach ensures I deliver robust, efficient APIs that meet diverse client needs.

If you’re interested in seeing more of my projects or following my latest insights, feel free to check out my developer profiles below:

Happy coding, and don’t hesitate to reach out if you want to discuss backend development with Rust, Go, or APIs in general. Remember, the key is to choose the right tool for the job—and sometimes, that means harnessing the strengths of both!

Top comments (0)