JPMorgan Chase filed Q4 2025 with $1.59 trillion in 13F holdings. The dual engine: $30 billion in SPY (broad market) and $85 billion in NVIDIA (AI conviction). Together they reveal how America's largest bank balances passive exposure with tech concentration.
The filing
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| 13F AUM | $1.59 trillion |
| SPY position | ~$30B |
| NVDA position | ~$85B (~5.3% weight) |
| Filer type | Largest U.S. bank by assets |
| Business mix | Asset management + wealth management + trading desk |
The dual engine
Engine 1: SPY at $30B — the passive core
JPMorgan holds $30B in SPY for the same reasons as other major banks:
- J.P. Morgan Asset Management runs index funds
- Wealth management client portfolios use SPY as core allocation
- Trading desk needs SPY inventory for client facilitation
Engine 2: NVDA at $85B — the AI conviction
$85B in NVIDIA at ~5.3% weight is notable because:
- It's below index weight (~6.5%) — JPMorgan is actually UNDERWEIGHTING NVDA relative to the S&P 500
- Or the weight reflects a mix of passive (index weight) and active (some funds overweight, some underweight)
- $85B is still the single largest NVDA dollar position among bank filers
JPMorgan vs. other $1T+ filers
| Filer | AUM | SPY/index position | NVDA weight | Character |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan | $1.59T | $30B SPY | ~5.3% | Bank: WM + AM + trading |
| Fidelity/FMR | $2.0T | Minimal SPY | 10.3% | Active mutual fund family |
| BofA | $1.37T | Less SPY, more VTV/VUG | ~index | Wealth management dominant |
| Vanguard | $6.9T | IS the index | ~6.8% | Pure passive |
| BlackRock | $5.9T | IS the index | ~6.5% | Pure passive |
JPMorgan sits between the pure passive giants (Vanguard, BlackRock) and the pure active managers (Fidelity). Their filing blends all three business lines:
- Passive exposure through index products (SPY)
- Active conviction through JPMAM funds (individual stock overweights)
- Trading desk inventory (client facilitation)
NVDA at $85B: the JPMAM signal
JPMorgan Asset Management (JPMAM) is one of the world's largest active fund managers. Their NVDA allocation within the aggregate filing reveals:
If NVDA is at index weight (~5.3% vs. 6.5% index)
JPMAM's active funds may be underweighting NVDA — a notable deviation when most active managers overweight it.
What underweighting NVDA would mean
- JPMAM's tech analysts see less upside than consensus
- Risk management is capping single-stock exposure
- JPMorgan's house view is more cautious on AI valuations than Fidelity's
Cross-reference with Jamie Dimon's comments
Dimon has been publicly cautious about AI hype while acknowledging its transformative potential. An NVDA underweight in the 13F would be consistent with his stated view.
The $1.59T breakdown (estimated)
| Business line | Est. contribution | Character |
|---|---|---|
| JPMAM (asset management) | ~$800B | Active + index funds |
| J.P. Morgan Wealth Management | ~$500B | Client portfolios |
| Trading desk | ~$200B | Market-making, hedging |
| Other | ~$90B | Treasury, proprietary |
What to watch
- NVDA weight trajectory: Is JPMorgan increasing toward index weight (bullish shift) or staying below (cautious)?
- SPY vs. individual stock balance: Is the passive allocation growing or shrinking?
- New positions from JPMAM: What stocks are JPMorgan's active funds adding?
- Cross-reference with Dimon's public comments: Does the filing match the CEO's stated market views?
Originally published at 13F Insight
Top comments (0)