Automated Testing: utPLSQL for Backends

#oracle #apex #plsql #testing

🇪🇸 Leer en Español: Clic aquí para la versión en español

🚀 Update: We have moved to our custom domain! Enjoy a better experience at
insightsapex.vinnyum.tech.

Mastering automated testing in Oracle APEX to enhance performance and maintainability

"Testing is not just a phase; it's an essential part of the architecture."

Have you ever felt that sinking feeling when deploying a critical hotfix on a
Friday? That anxiety isn't just nerves, it's a warning sign of fragile
architecture.

The common misconception in software development is that automated testing is
merely an optional phase to catch bugs before deployment. The reality? In a
world increasingly reliant on complex systems, automated testing is
foundational to application architecture. Without it, you risk introducing
unmanageable technical debt that can cripple your application's scalability and
maintainability.

In this APEX Insight, we will explore how utPLSQL enables robust automated testing
for your Oracle APEX backend, allowing your applications to scale and adapt
seamlessly while maintaining high performance and quality standards. For a
broader look at backend architecture, check out our insights on
PL/SQL Best Practices.

The Architectural Challenge

Automated testing in Oracle APEX presents unique challenges:

Complexity of PL/SQL: Unlike traditional application code, PL/SQL logic is often tightly coupled with the database schema, making it difficult to isolate for testing.
Limited Testing Frameworks: Many developers are unaware of the capabilities of utPLSQL, leading to underutilization of its features for effective testing.
Cultural Resistance: Teams may be accustomed to manual testing processes, and shifting to automated testing requires a change in mindset.

These challenges can lead to a fragile application where new changes introduce
unexpected behaviors, increasing the risk of downtime and loss of user trust.

Mental Models

To successfully implement automated testing with utPLSQL, consider these mental
models:

Test-Driven Development (TDD): Adopt TDD principles where tests are written before the code. This leads to a design that naturally accommodates testing.
Separation of Concerns: Design your PL/SQL packages with clear boundaries to make testing easier. Each package should have a single responsibility.
Continuous Integration: Implement a CI/CD pipeline that runs your tests automatically, ensuring that every change is validated against your test suite.

  flowchart LR
      A[Commit Code] --> B[CI Pipeline Triggered]
      B --> C{Run utPLSQL}
      C -- Pass --> D[Deploy to QA]
      C -- Fail --> E[Notify Developer]

📏 Rule of Thumb: "If it’s not tested, it’s broken."

Strategic Patterns

To successfully leverage utPLSQL for automated testing, follow these strategic patterns:

Package Structure: Organize your PL/SQL code into packages. Each package
should encapsulate related functionality, which aids in isolating tests.
Utilization of utPLSQL: Use utPLSQL's features to define tests for your
PL/SQL code. This includes:
- Assertions to validate outcomes
- Setup and teardown processes for test environments
Test Suites: Group related tests into suites to run them collectively,
making it easier to manage and report on test results.

Below is a high-level view of how this can be structured:

graph TD;
    A[Application Logic] --> B[PL/SQL Packages]
    B --> C[utPLSQL Tests]
    C --> D[Test Results]
    D --> E[Feedback Loop]

Technical Implementation

Here’s how to implement utPLSQL in your Oracle APEX backend:

BAD Code Example: Naive Approach

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE update_user (
    p_user_id IN NUMBER,
    p_username IN VARCHAR2
) IS
BEGIN
    UPDATE users SET username = p_username WHERE id = p_user_id;
END;

This lacks any form of testing, error handling, or validation.

GOOD Code Example: Using utPLSQL

CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE user_management AS
    PROCEDURE update_user (p_user_id IN NUMBER, p_username IN VARCHAR2);
END user_management;
/

CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY user_management AS
    PROCEDURE update_user (p_user_id IN NUMBER, p_username IN VARCHAR2) IS
    BEGIN
        -- Ensure the user exists before updating
        IF NOT user_exists(p_user_id) THEN
            RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20001, 'User does not exist.');
        END IF;

        UPDATE users SET username = p_username WHERE id = p_user_id;
    END update_user;
END user_management;

Writing the utPLSQL Test

CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE TEST_user_management AS
    --%suite(User Management Tests)

    --%test(Update User - Valid)
    PROCEDURE test_update_user_valid;

    --%test(Update User - Invalid ID raises error)
    --%throws(-20001)
    PROCEDURE test_update_user_invalid;
END TEST_user_management;
/

CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY TEST_user_management AS
    PROCEDURE test_update_user_valid IS
        l_actual VARCHAR2(50);
    BEGIN
        -- Act
        user_management.update_user(1, 'new_username');

        -- Assert (Using helper to fetch state)
        SELECT username INTO l_actual FROM users WHERE id = 1;
        ut.expect(l_actual).to_equal('new_username');
    END test_update_user_valid;

    PROCEDURE test_update_user_invalid IS
    BEGIN
        -- Act (Exception expected by annotation)
        user_management.update_user(999, 'new_username');
    END test_update_user_invalid;
END TEST_user_management;

💡 How it Works: Notice the --%suite and --%test annotations? These
magic comments tell the utPLSQL framework exactly what to run, stripping away
the need for complex configuration files.

📝 Note: Try it Yourself!
You can clone a full working example with these tests in our Demos Repository.

Common Pitfalls

Even with a solid strategy, pitfalls can derail your testing efforts:

Ignoring Dependencies: Tests should not rely on actual database states or other external systems. Use mocks where necessary.
Overcomplicating Tests: Keep your tests simple and focused. Each test should assess a single behavior to avoid confusion.
Neglecting Maintenance: As your application evolves, so should your tests. Regularly review and update your test suite to reflect current business logic.

Consultant Tip: "Regularly integrate testing into your deployment pipeline
to catch issues early."

Consultant's Checklist

Before deploying your automated testing strategy, validate with these
hard-hitting questions. Stable environments make for stable tests. Ensure your
app config doesn't sabotage automation:

Is Rejoin Sessions disabled?
Are all Item protections set to Restricted?
Do we use a dedicated parsing schema?
Are tests run automatically on each build?
Is there a clear ownership of tests within the team?

Conclusion

Automated testing using utPLSQL is not just an enhancement; it’s a necessity for
building scalable and maintainable Oracle APEX applications. By adopting the
principles discussed, you can shift from a reactive to a proactive approach in
managing software quality.

Remember, the goal is not to merely write tests but to embed testing into your
architectural DNA. This will ultimately lead to improved team velocity, reduced
technical debt, and a more robust application.

What is the number one reason your team hasn't adopted automated testing yet?
Let’s discuss on LinkedIn or X.

References

💡 Bonus: Quality Checklist

Want to ensure your application meets all standards? Download our Oracle APEX
Automated Testing Checklist and take your development to the next level.

👉 Download Checklist (PDF)

🚀 Need an APEX Expert?

I help companies facilitate professional Oracle APEX development and DevOps. If
you want to build better applications or automate your pipeline, let's talk.

☕ Schedule a Coffee
💼 Connect on LinkedIn
🐦 Follow on X