Frameworks are amazing.
They solve real problems and speed things up.
But somewhere along the way, “choose a framework” became the default answer—even when the problem doesn’t need one.
Let’s talk about it.
Frameworks Are Tools, Not Requirements
Using a framework should be a decision, not a reflex.
If the problem is:
- A simple landing page
- A small internal tool
- A static content site
- A one-off feature
Then adding a heavy framework may cost more than it gives.
The Hidden Cost of Frameworks
Frameworks bring:
- Build steps
- Tooling complexity
- Dependency updates
- Version migrations
- Opinionated structure
These costs are fine—when the project actually benefits from them.
Complexity Isn’t the Same as Scalability
Many projects never scale the way we imagine.
Prematurely adding:
- State management libraries
- Abstraction layers
- Heavy routing systems
Often slows teams down instead of helping them.
Simple solutions scale surprisingly far.
Vanilla Solutions Are Still Valid
HTML, CSS, and JavaScript aren’t “basic.”
They’re foundational.
You can:
- Build fast interfaces
- Ship accessible sites
- Optimize performance easily Knowing when to use vanilla is a senior skill.
Frameworks Shine When Development Problems Are Real
Frameworks make sense when you need:
- Large team collaboration
- Complex state management
- Long-term maintainability
- Strong ecosystem support
The mistake isn’t using frameworks—it’s using them by default.
The Best Developers Choose Intentionally
Good developers ask:
- What problem are we solving?
- How long will this live?
- Who will maintain it?
- What’s the simplest solution that works?
Sometimes the answer is a framework.
Sometimes it’s not.
Final Thought
Frameworks don’t make developers better.
Decision-making does.
Using the right tool—including no framework at all—is what actually scales.
Top comments (0)