The financial landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. 2025 will be the year the integration of AI agents and smart accounts takes off. Picture a relentless, intelligent entity working around the clock to manage your crypto portfolio. We stand at the precipice of a new era where artificial intelligence meets decentralized finance (DeFi), creating unprecedented opportunities for democratized, transparent, and intelligent investment strategies.
Traditional hedge funds have long operated as exclusive clubs, accessible only to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. These centralized entities manage trillions of dollars behind closed doors, using proprietary algorithms and strategies that remain opaque to investors. Meanwhile, the DeFi revolution has democratized access to financial services, but sophisticated trading intelligence has remained locked behind complex bots or centralized platforms.
Delphi Ventures represents the convergence of these two worlds – a revolutionary decentralized AI hedge fund protocol that introduces Collective Intelligence Trading (CIT). This paradigm shift enables multiple AI agents to collaborate, compete, and evolve their strategies in real-time, creating an ever-improving trading collective that operates with complete transparency and accessibility.
The Vision
Imagine a dynamic network of specialized AI agents – each with its own expertise and personality – working together to navigate volatile crypto markets with institutional-grade precision. Picture a Momentum Hunter that never sleeps, constantly scanning charts for breakout patterns, while a Sentiment Sage analyzes thousands of social media posts and news articles to gauge market emotions. Meanwhile, a Risk Guardian vigilantly protects portfolios from sudden downturns, and an Arbitrage Scout identifies profit opportunities across dozens of exchanges simultaneously.
This isn't science fiction – it's the reality we're building today.
The Problem with Traditional Finance {#problem-statement}
Centralization and Exclusivity
Traditional hedge funds operate under a model that inherently excludes the majority of potential investors. With minimum investments often starting at $1 million and management fees ranging from 2-20%, these investment vehicles remain accessible only to the wealthy elite. This creates a fundamental inequality in financial opportunities, where sophisticated investment strategies are reserved for those who need them least. As highlighted by numerous academic studies, the concentration of financial power in the hands of a few can exacerbate wealth inequality (Piketty, 2014).
Opacity and Trust Issues
Traditional fund managers operate as black boxes. Investors must trust that their capital is being managed effectively without any visibility into the decision-making process. This opacity has led to numerous scandals, from Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme to more recent cases of mismanagement and fraud. The lack of transparency creates an asymmetric relationship where fund managers hold all the information advantage. The concept of "trustless" systems, a cornerstone of blockchain technology, directly addresses this issue by providing verifiable on-chain records of all operations.
Inefficient Fee Structures
The traditional "2 and 20" fee structure (2% management fee plus 20% performance fee) means that fund managers are compensated regardless of performance. This misalignment of incentives can lead to situations where managers focus more on asset gathering than on generating returns for investors. As research by academic institutions like the Yale School of Management suggests, high fees can significantly erode long-term investment returns, often outweighing any alpha generated.
Limited AI Capabilities for Retail
While institutional investors have access to sophisticated AI-driven trading systems, retail investors are left with basic tools and limited insights. Major financial institutions like Man Group extensively use AI surveillance to detect insider trading and market manipulation. Their algorithms flag unusual activity, relationships, and patterns, and then alert compliance teams to potential breaches. This technology gap creates an unfair advantage for institutions and limits the potential returns for individual investors, a disparity that DeFi aims to level.
DeFi's Current Limitations
While DeFi has democratized access to financial services, it often lacks the sophisticated AI-driven strategies that can adapt to market conditions autonomously. Most DeFi protocols operate on simple, predetermined rules without the ability to learn and evolve. Price fluctuations that take weeks in traditional markets can happen in minutes in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, requiring more advanced and responsive trading systems than currently offered by most smart contracts. The need for adaptive intelligence is critical in the fast-paced crypto environment.
Technical Architecture Overview {#technical-architecture}
Core Infrastructure Stack
The Delphi Ventures protocol is built on a sophisticated multi-layered architecture that seamlessly integrates blockchain technology, artificial intelligence, and advanced data processing systems. This technical foundation enables the creation of a truly autonomous and intelligent investment ecosystem.
Layer 1: Blockchain Core (EVM-Compatible)
At the foundation lies an EVM-compatible blockchain infrastructure that provides the security, transparency, and decentralization necessary for trustless financial operations. The choice of EVM compatibility ensures broad ecosystem compatibility and rapid deployment capabilities. This allows for the creation of immutable smart contracts that govern all fund operations.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/proxy/utils/Initializable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/security/ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/access/AccessControlUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/security/PausableUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol";
/**
* @title DelphiVault
* @dev Main vault contract for AI-powered trading strategies
*/
contract DelphiVault is
Initializable,
ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable,
AccessControlUpgradeable,
PausableUpgradeable
{
using SafeERC20 for IERC20;
// Role definitions
bytes32 public constant AI_AGENT_ROLE = keccak256("AI_AGENT_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE = keccak256("STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant EMERGENCY_ROLE = keccak256("EMERGENCY_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant ORACLE_ROLE = keccak256("ORACLE_ROLE");
// Structs for data organization
struct UserDeposit {
uint256 amount;
uint256 shares;
uint256 depositTime;
uint256 lockPeriod;
bool isActive;
}
struct AIAgent {
address agentAddress;
uint256 reputationScore;
uint256 stakedTokens;
uint256 successfulTrades;
uint256 totalTrades;
uint256 totalProfit;
uint256 totalLoss;
bool isActive;
string specialization;
}
struct Strategy {
bytes32 strategyId;
string name;
address strategyContract;
uint256 allocatedFunds;
uint256 totalReturns;
uint256 riskScore;
bool isActive;
uint256 createdAt;
}
struct TradeExecution {
bytes32 tradeId;
bytes32 agentId;
bytes32 strategyId;
uint256 amount;
address tokenIn;
address tokenOut;
uint256 expectedReturn;
uint256 actualReturn;
uint256 executionTime;
bool isSuccessful;
}
// State variables
mapping(address => UserDeposit[]) public userDeposits;
mapping(bytes32 => AIAgent) public aiAgents;
mapping(bytes32 => Strategy) public strategies;
mapping(bytes32 => TradeExecution[]) public agentTrades;
mapping(address => uint256) public tokenBalances;
uint256 public totalValueLocked;
uint256 public totalShares;
uint256 public performanceFee; // Basis points (e.g., 1000 = 10%)
uint256 public managementFee; // Basis points (e.g., 200 = 2%)
uint256 public minimumDeposit;
uint256 public maxDrawdown; // Maximum allowed drawdown in basis points
// Events
event Deposit(address indexed user, uint256 amount, uint256 shares);
event Withdrawal(address indexed user, uint256 amount, uint256 shares);
event AIAgentRegistered(bytes32 indexed agentId, address agentAddress);
event StrategyExecuted(bytes32 indexed strategyId, bytes32 indexed agentId, uint256 profit);
event EmergencyWithdrawal(address indexed user, uint256 amount);
event PerformanceFeeCollected(uint256 amount);
// Modifiers
modifier onlyActiveAgent(bytes32 agentId) {
require(aiAgents[agentId].isActive, "Agent not active");
require(aiAgents[agentId].reputationScore >= 500, "Agent reputation too low"); // 0.5 out of 1.0
_;
}
modifier validDeposit(uint256 amount) {
require(amount >= minimumDeposit, "Amount below minimum deposit");
require(amount <= getMaxSingleDeposit(), "Amount exceeds maximum");
_;
}
/**
* @dev Initialize the vault contract
*/
function initialize(
uint256 _performanceFee,
uint256 _managementFee,
uint256 _minimumDeposit
) public initializer {
__ReentrancyGuard_init();
__AccessControl_init();
__Pausable_init();
_grantRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender);
_grantRole(EMERGENCY_ROLE, msg.sender);
performanceFee = _performanceFee;
managementFee = _managementFee;
minimumDeposit = _minimumDeposit;
maxDrawdown = 2000; // 20% maximum drawdown
}
/**
* @dev Deposit funds into the vault
*/
function deposit(
address token,
uint256 amount,
uint256 lockPeriod
) external nonReentrant whenNotPaused validDeposit(amount) {
require(lockPeriod >= 0 && lockPeriod <= 365 days, "Invalid lock period");
IERC20(token).safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount);
uint256 shares = calculateShares(amount);
UserDeposit memory newDeposit = UserDeposit({
amount: amount,
shares: shares,
depositTime: block.timestamp,
lockPeriod: lockPeriod,
isActive: true
});
userDeposits[msg.sender].push(newDeposit);
tokenBalances[token] += amount;
totalValueLocked += amount;
totalShares += shares;
emit Deposit(msg.sender, amount, shares);
}
/**
* @dev Register a new AI agent
*/
function registerAIAgent(
bytes32 agentId,
address agentAddress,
uint256 stakeAmount,
string memory specialization
) external onlyRole(AI_AGENT_ROLE) {
require(agentAddress != address(0), "Invalid agent address");
require(stakeAmount > 0, "Stake amount must be positive");
require(!aiAgents[agentId].isActive, "Agent already registered");
// Transfer stake tokens from agent
IERC20(getStakeToken()).safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), stakeAmount);
AIAgent memory newAgent = AIAgent({
agentAddress: agentAddress,
reputationScore: 1000, // Start with perfect reputation
stakedTokens: stakeAmount,
successfulTrades: 0,
totalTrades: 0,
totalProfit: 0,
totalLoss: 0,
isActive: true,
specialization: specialization
});
aiAgents[agentId] = newAgent;
emit AIAgentRegistered(agentId, agentAddress);
}
/**
* @dev Execute a trading strategy
*/
function executeStrategy(
bytes32 agentId,
bytes32 strategyId,
uint256 amount,
address tokenIn,
address tokenOut,
uint256 minAmountOut,
bytes calldata tradeData
) external onlyRole(AI_AGENT_ROLE) onlyActiveAgent(agentId) nonReentrant {
require(strategies[strategyId].isActive, "Strategy not active");
require(amount <= strategies[strategyId].allocatedFunds, "Insufficient strategy funds");
require(tokenBalances[tokenIn] >= amount, "Insufficient token balance");
// Record trade initiation
bytes32 tradeId = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(agentId, strategyId, block.timestamp));
TradeExecution memory trade = TradeExecution({
tradeId: tradeId,
agentId: agentId,
strategyId: strategyId,
amount: amount,
tokenIn: tokenIn,
tokenOut: tokenOut,
expectedReturn: minAmountOut,
actualReturn: 0,
executionTime: block.timestamp,
isSuccessful: false
});
try this.executeTradeInternal(
strategyId,
amount,
tokenIn,
tokenOut,
minAmountOut,
tradeData
) returns (uint256 amountOut) {
// Trade successful
trade.actualReturn = amountOut;
trade.isSuccessful = true;
// Update balances
tokenBalances[tokenIn] -= amount;
tokenBalances[tokenOut] += amountOut;
// Update agent reputation
updateAgentReputation(agentId, true, amountOut > minAmountOut ? amountOut - minAmountOut : 0);
// Update strategy performance
updateStrategyPerformance(strategyId, int256(amountOut) - int256(amount));
emit StrategyExecuted(strategyId, agentId, amountOut > amount ? amountOut - amount : 0);
} catch {
// Trade failed
updateAgentReputation(agentId, false, 0);
}
agentTrades[agentId].push(trade);
aiAgents[agentId].totalTrades++;
}
/**
* @dev Internal function to execute trades
*/
function executeTradeInternal(
bytes32 strategyId,
uint256 amount,
address tokenIn,
address tokenOut,
uint256 minAmountOut,
bytes calldata tradeData
) external returns (uint256 amountOut) {
require(msg.sender == address(this), "Internal function only");
// Get strategy contract
address strategyContract = strategies[strategyId].strategyContract;
require(strategyContract != address(0), "Invalid strategy contract");
// Execute trade through strategy contract
(bool success, bytes memory returnData) = strategyContract.call(tradeData);
require(success, "Strategy execution failed");
amountOut = abi.decode(returnData, (uint256));
require(amountOut >= minAmountOut, "Insufficient output amount");
return amountOut;
}
/**
* @dev Update agent reputation based on performance
*/
function updateAgentReputation(
bytes32 agentId,
bool tradeSuccessful,
uint256 profit
) internal {
AIAgent storage agent = aiAgents[agentId];
if (tradeSuccessful) {
agent.successfulTrades++;
agent.totalProfit += profit;
// Increase reputation for successful trades
uint256 reputationIncrease = (profit * 100) / 1e18; // Scale appropriately
agent.reputationScore = min(agent.reputationScore + reputationIncrease, 2000); // Max 2.0 reputation
} else {
// Decrease reputation for failed trades
uint256 reputationDecrease = 50; // Fixed penalty for failed trades
agent.reputationScore = agent.reputationScore > reputationDecrease
? agent.reputationScore - reputationDecrease
: 0;
// Deactivate agent if reputation falls too low
if (agent.reputationScore < 200) { // 0.2 threshold
agent.isActive = false;
}
}
}
/**
* @dev Calculate shares for deposit amount
*/
function calculateShares(uint256 amount) public view returns (uint256) {
if (totalShares == 0) {
return amount;
}
return (amount * totalShares) / totalValueLocked;
}
/**
* @dev Calculate withdrawal amount for shares
*/
function calculateWithdrawalAmount(uint256 shares) public view returns (uint256) {
if (totalShares == 0) {
return 0;
}
return (shares * totalValueLocked) / totalShares;
}
/**
* @dev Emergency withdrawal function
*/
function emergencyWithdraw() external onlyRole(EMERGENCY_ROLE) {
_pause();
// Additional emergency logic here
}
/**
* @dev Utility functions
*/
function min(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
return a < b ? a : b;
}
function getMaxSingleDeposit() public view returns (uint256) {
return totalValueLocked / 10; // Maximum 10% of TVL in single deposit
}
function getStakeToken() public pure returns (address) {
// Return the address of the staking token (could be the governance token)
return 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890; // Placeholder
}
/**
* @dev Update strategy performance metrics
*/
function updateStrategyPerformance(bytes32 strategyId, int256 profitOrLoss) internal {
Strategy storage strat = strategies[strategyId];
if (profitOrLoss >= 0) {
strat.totalReturns += uint256(profitOrLoss);
} else {
// Handle losses by potentially reducing capital or adjusting strategy
// For now, we just track the negative impact.
}
// Logic to update strategy riskScore based on PnL and volatility
}
}
Layer 2: AI Collective Engine
The AI Collective Engine represents the brain of the Delphi Ventures ecosystem. Built using Python and advanced machine learning frameworks, this layer houses multiple specialized AI agents that process vast amounts of market data and generate trading signals. These agents are designed to be modular and interoperable, allowing for continuous improvement and the addition of new capabilities.
import asyncio
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from transformers import pipeline
import websocket
import json
class BaseAIAgent:
def __init__(self, agent_id: str, reputation_threshold: float = 0.75):
self.agent_id = agent_id
self.reputation_score = 1.0
self.reputation_threshold = reputation_threshold
self.model = self._initialize_model()
self.sentiment_analyzer = pipeline("sentiment-analysis")
def _initialize_model(self):
"""Initialize the neural network model for this agent"""
# Example: A simple feed-forward network for signal generation
return nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(100, 256), # Input features could be a combination of indicators
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Dropout(0.3),
nn.Linear(256, 128),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(128, 64),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(64, 3) # Output: Buy, Hold, Sell
)
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Abstract method for market analysis.
This should be implemented by specialized agents.
"""
raise NotImplementedError
async def generate_signal(self, market_data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Generate trading signal based on analysis.
This method acts as a gateway, calling the specialized analysis
and then translating the results into a structured trading signal.
"""
analysis = await self.analyze_market_data(market_data)
# Calculate confidence score based on the quality of analysis and internal agent metrics
confidence = self._calculate_confidence(analysis)
if confidence < self.reputation_threshold:
return {"action": "hold", "confidence": confidence, "reasoning": "Low confidence signal"}
# The actual signal generation logic would be in _create_trading_signal,
# which is tailored to the agent's specialization.
return self._create_trading_signal(analysis, confidence)
def _calculate_confidence(self, analysis_results: Dict) -> float:
"""Calculate confidence score for the generated signal.
This is a crucial part for reputation building and agent selection.
Confidence can be derived from:
- Certainty of indicators (e.g., RSI extreme levels)
- Strength of identified patterns
- Volume of positive sentiment data
- Low variance in analysis outputs
"""
# Placeholder for confidence calculation logic
return np.random.uniform(0.5, 1.0) # Example: Random confidence
def _create_trading_signal(self, analysis: Dict, confidence: float) -> Dict:
"""Translate analytical findings into a concrete trading signal."""
# This method will be specific to each agent type.
# For example, MomentumHunter might look for specific RSI or MACD crossovers.
# SentimentSage might look for a strong consensus in sentiment.
# Example placeholder logic:
action = "hold"
reasoning = "No strong signal detected"
if analysis.get('momentum_score', 0) > 0.7 and confidence > 0.8:
action = "buy"
reasoning = "Strong bullish momentum detected"
elif analysis.get('momentum_score', 0) < -0.7 and confidence > 0.8:
action = "sell"
reasoning = "Strong bearish momentum detected"
# Add potential target price, stop loss, and trade size calculation based on analysis
signal = {
"action": action,
"confidence": confidence,
"reasoning": reasoning,
"target_price": analysis.get("target_price", None),
"stop_loss": analysis.get("stop_loss", None),
"trade_size_percentage": analysis.get("trade_size_percentage", 0.01) # Default to 1%
}
return signal
class MomentumHunter(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("momentum_hunter")
self.lookback_periods = [5, 10, 20, 50, 200] # Different timeframes for analysis
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Specialized momentum analysis using multiple timeframes and indicators."""
prices = np.array(data['prices'])
volumes = np.array(data['volumes'])
momentum_signals = {}
# Calculate common momentum indicators across different lookback periods
for period in self.lookback_periods:
if len(prices) >= period:
# Rate of Change (ROC)
roc = (prices[-1] - prices[-period]) / prices[-period] * 100
momentum_signals[f'roc_{period}'] = roc
# Relative Strength Index (RSI)
rsi = self._calculate_rsi(prices, period)
momentum_signals[f'rsi_{period}'] = rsi
# Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) - simplified
macd, signal_line, histogram = self._calculate_macd(prices)
momentum_signals[f'macd_hist_{period}'] = histogram[-1] if len(histogram) > 0 else 0
# Volume Momentum
if len(volumes) >= period * 2:
avg_volume_recent = np.mean(volumes[-period:])
avg_volume_prior = np.mean(volumes[-period*2:-period])
volume_momentum = avg_volume_recent / avg_volume_prior if avg_volume_prior != 0 else 1.0
momentum_signals[f'volume_momentum_{period}'] = volume_momentum
# Advanced pattern recognition
patterns = self._detect_patterns(prices)
momentum_signals.update(patterns) # Merge pattern analysis into signals
# Composite momentum score
momentum_signals['momentum_score'] = self._calculate_composite_momentum(momentum_signals)
# Determine target price and stop loss based on patterns and indicators
momentum_signals['target_price'], momentum_signals['stop_loss'] = self._determine_trade_levels(momentum_signals, prices)
return momentum_signals
def _calculate_rsi(self, prices: np.ndarray, period: int) -> float:
"""Calculate Relative Strength Index (RSI)"""
deltas = np.diff(prices)
gains = np.where(deltas > 0, deltas, 0)
losses = np.where(deltas < 0, -deltas, 0)
avg_gain = np.mean(gains[-period:])
avg_loss = np.mean(losses[-period:])
if avg_loss == 0:
return 100.0
rs = avg_gain / avg_loss
rsi = 100 - (100 / (1 + rs))
return rsi
def _calculate_macd(self, prices: np.ndarray, fast_period=12, slow_period=26, signal_period=9) -> Tuple[List[float], List[float], List[float]]:
"""Calculate MACD indicator (MACD line, Signal line, Histogram)"""
if len(prices) < slow_period:
return [], [], []
# Calculate EMA for fast and slow periods
ema_fast = self._calculate_ema(prices, fast_period)
ema_slow = self._calculate_ema(prices, slow_period)
macd_line = [ema_fast[i] - ema_slow[i] for i in range(len(ema_slow)) if not np.isnan(ema_fast[i]) and not np.isnan(ema_slow[i])]
# Calculate EMA for the MACD line to get the signal line
signal_line = self._calculate_ema(np.array(macd_line), signal_period)
# Calculate MACD histogram
histogram = [macd_line[i] - signal_line[i] for i in range(len(signal_line)) if not np.isnan(macd_line[i]) and not np.isnan(signal_line[i])]
return macd_line, signal_line, histogram
def _calculate_ema(self, prices: np.ndarray, period: int) -> List[float]:
"""Calculate Exponential Moving Average (EMA)"""
if len(prices) < period:
return [np.nan] * len(prices)
ema = [np.nan] * (period - 1)
ema.append(np.mean(prices[:period]))
alpha = 2 / (period + 1)
for i in range(period, len(prices)):
ema.append(prices[i] * alpha + ema[-1] * (1 - alpha))
return ema
def _detect_patterns(self, prices: np.ndarray) -> Dict:
"""Detect chart patterns using simplified logic or ML models."""
# This is a placeholder for more sophisticated pattern detection.
# Could involve FFT, CNNs applied to price charts, or specific pattern matching algorithms.
patterns = {
'trend_strength': self._calculate_trend_strength(prices),
'support_resistance_levels': self._find_support_resistance(prices),
'breakout_probability': self._calculate_breakout_probability(prices)
}
return patterns
def _calculate_trend_strength(self, prices: np.ndarray) -> float:
"""Calculate the strength of the current trend (e.g., using ADX or slope)."""
if len(prices) < 20: return 0.0
# Simple linear regression slope as a proxy for trend strength
x = np.arange(len(prices))
y = prices
slope, _ = np.polyfit(x, y, 1)
return slope / np.mean(prices) * 100 # Normalized slope
def _find_support_resistance(self, prices: np.ndarray) -> Dict:
"""Identify potential support and resistance levels."""
# Placeholder: Could use pivot points, Fibonacci levels, or clustering algorithms.
return {'support': np.min(prices[-20:]), 'resistance': np.max(prices[-20:])}
def _calculate_breakout_probability(self, prices: np.ndarray) -> float:
"""Estimate probability of a price breakout."""
# Placeholder: Could analyze price consolidation, volatility expansion, etc.
if len(prices) < 10: return 0.5
volatility = np.std(prices[-10:]) / np.mean(prices[-10:])
return min(1.0, volatility * 10) # Higher volatility implies higher breakout chance
def _calculate_composite_momentum(self, signals: Dict) -> float:
"""Combine various momentum indicators into a single score."""
# Weighted average of key indicators. Weights can be learned or predefined.
score = 0
score += signals.get('roc_20', 0) * 0.3
score += signals.get('rsi_20', 0) * 0.2 # Consider RSI divergence
score += signals.get('macd_hist_20', 0) * 0.25
score += signals.get('volume_momentum_10', 0) * 0.25
# Normalize score to -1 to 1
return np.clip(score / 50.0, -1, 1) # Rough normalization
def _determine_trade_levels(self, signals: Dict, prices: np.ndarray) -> Tuple[float, float]:
"""Determine potential target price and stop loss based on indicators and patterns."""
target_price = None
stop_loss = None
if signals.get('breakout_probability', 0) > 0.7:
if signals.get('momentum_score', 0) > 0.5: # Bullish breakout
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 + signals.get('roc_20', 0.01) / 100 * 2) # 2x ROC target
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.015) # 1.5% stop loss
elif signals.get('momentum_score', 0) < -0.5: # Bearish breakout
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 - abs(signals.get('roc_20', 0.01)) / 100 * 2)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.015)
else: # No clear breakout, use support/resistance
if signals.get('momentum_score', 0) > 0.3: # Mild bullish momentum
target_price = signals.get('support_resistance_levels', {}).get('resistance', prices[-1] * 1.02)
stop_loss = signals.get('support_resistance_levels', {}).get('support', prices[-1] * 0.99)
elif signals.get('momentum_score', 0) < -0.3: # Mild bearish momentum
target_price = signals.get('support_resistance_levels', {}).get('support', prices[-1] * 0.98)
stop_loss = signals.get('support_resistance_levels', {}).get('resistance', prices[-1] * 1.01)
return target_price, stop_loss
class SentimentSage(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("sentiment_sage")
self.news_sources = ['coindesk', 'cointelegraph', 'decrypt', 'theblock']
self.social_platforms = ['twitter', 'reddit', 'telegram', 'discord']
# Load a pre-trained FinBERT model for financial text sentiment analysis
self.sentiment_analyzer = pipeline("sentiment-analysis", model="ProsusAI/finbert")
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Multi-modal sentiment analysis across news and social media."""
sentiment_scores = {}
# News sentiment analysis
if 'news_data' in data:
news_sentiment = await self._analyze_news_sentiment(data['news_data'])
sentiment_scores['news'] = news_sentiment
# Social media sentiment
if 'social_data' in data:
social_sentiment = await self._analyze_social_sentiment(data['social_data'])
sentiment_scores['social'] = social_sentiment
# Market sentiment indicators (e.g., Fear & Greed Index)
if 'market_data' in data:
market_sentiment = self._calculate_fear_greed_index(data)
sentiment_scores['market_indicators'] = market_sentiment
# Aggregate sentiment with weighted scoring
aggregate_sentiment = self._calculate_aggregate_sentiment(sentiment_scores)
return {
'individual_sentiments': sentiment_scores,
'aggregate_sentiment': aggregate_sentiment,
'sentiment_trend': self._calculate_sentiment_trend(sentiment_scores),
'fear_greed_index': sentiment_scores.get('market_indicators', {}).get('index', 50)
}
async def _analyze_news_sentiment(self, news_data: List[Dict]) -> Dict:
"""Advanced NLP analysis of news articles, considering source credibility and recency."""
sentiments = []
importance_weights = []
for article in news_data:
try:
# Analyze headline and content
headline_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(article['headline'])[0]
# Analyze a snippet of the content for deeper understanding
content_snippet = article['content'][:512] if len(article['content']) > 512 else article['content']
content_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(content_snippet)[0]
# Calculate importance weight based on source credibility and engagement metrics (e.g., views, shares)
weight = self._calculate_article_importance(article)
# Combine headline and content sentiment, prioritizing content for nuanced analysis
# Sentiment label mapping: POSITIVE -> 1, NEUTRAL -> 0, NEGATIVE -> -1
sentiment_map = {'POSITIVE': 1, 'NEUTRAL': 0, 'NEGATIVE': -1}
headline_score = sentiment_map.get(headline_sentiment['label'], 0)
content_score = sentiment_map.get(content_sentiment['label'], 0)
combined_sentiment_score = (headline_score * 0.3 + content_score * 0.7)
sentiments.append(combined_sentiment_score)
importance_weights.append(weight)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error analyzing news article: {e}")
continue # Skip article if analysis fails
# Weighted average sentiment
if sentiments:
# Normalize weights if they don't sum to 1
total_weight = sum(importance_weights)
normalized_weights = [w / total_weight for w in importance_weights] if total_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(importance_weights)]*len(importance_weights)
weighted_sentiment = np.average(sentiments, weights=normalized_weights)
# Calculate confidence based on variance and number of sources
variance = np.var(sentiments) if len(sentiments) > 1 else 0
confidence = max(0, 1 - variance * 5) # Simple inverse relationship with variance
return {
'score': weighted_sentiment,
'confidence': confidence,
'article_count': len(sentiments)
}
return {'score': 0.0, 'confidence': 0.0, 'article_count': 0}
async def _analyze_social_sentiment(self, social_data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Analyze sentiment from various social media platforms."""
all_sentiments = []
all_weights = []
for platform, mentions in social_data.items():
platform_sentiments = []
platform_weights = []
for mention in mentions:
try:
# Sentiment analysis on the text of the mention
text_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(mention['text'][:280])[0] # Truncate for efficiency
sentiment_map = {'POSITIVE': 1, 'NEUTRAL': 0, 'NEGATIVE': -1}
sentiment_score = sentiment_map.get(text_sentiment['label'], 0)
# Weight by user influence (follower count, engagement history) and mention engagement
influence = self._calculate_user_influence(mention.get('user_info', {}))
engagement_score = mention.get('engagement', 1) # Default engagement to 1
weighted_sentiment = sentiment_score * influence * engagement_score
platform_sentiments.append(sentiment_score)
platform_weights.append(influence * engagement_score)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error analyzing social mention: {e}")
continue
if platform_sentiments:
total_platform_weight = sum(platform_weights)
normalized_platform_weights = [w / total_platform_weight for w in platform_weights] if total_platform_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(platform_weights)]*len(platform_weights)
avg_platform_sentiment = np.average(platform_sentiments, weights=normalized_platform_weights)
all_sentiments.append(avg_platform_sentiment)
# Use a simplified weight for platform contribution to overall sentiment
all_weights.append(self._get_platform_weight(platform))
if all_sentiments:
total_weight = sum(all_weights)
normalized_weights = [w / total_weight for w in all_weights] if total_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(all_weights)]*len(all_weights)
aggregate_sentiment = np.average(all_sentiments, weights=normalized_weights)
variance = np.var(all_sentiments) if len(all_sentiments) > 1 else 0
confidence = max(0, 1 - variance * 3)
return {
'score': aggregate_sentiment,
'confidence': confidence,
'platform_contributions': dict(zip(self.social_platforms, all_sentiments))
}
return {'score': 0.0, 'confidence': 0.0, 'platform_contributions': {}}
def _calculate_aggregate_sentiment(self, sentiments: Dict) -> float:
"""Combine sentiment scores from different sources, applying weights."""
# Assign weights based on perceived reliability and impact
weights = {
'news': 0.5,
'social': 0.3,
'market_indicators': 0.2
}
total_weighted_sentiment = 0
total_weight = 0
if 'news' in sentiments and sentiments['news']['score'] != 0:
total_weighted_sentiment += sentiments['news']['score'] * sentiments['news']['confidence'] * weights['news']
total_weight += weights['news'] * sentiments['news']['confidence']
if 'social' in sentiments and sentiments['social']['score'] != 0:
total_weighted_sentiment += sentiments['social']['score'] * sentiments['social']['confidence'] * weights['social']
total_weight += weights['social'] * sentiments['social']['confidence']
if 'market_indicators' in sentiments:
# Fear & Greed index is already a composite, use it directly with its own weighting
fear_greed_score = (sentiments['market_indicators']['index'] - 50) / 50 # Normalize to -1 to 1
total_weighted_sentiment += fear_greed_score * weights['market_indicators']
total_weight += weights['market_indicators']
if total_weight == 0: return 0.0
return total_weighted_sentiment / total_weight
def _calculate_sentiment_trend(self, sentiments: Dict) -> float:
"""Analyze the trend of sentiment over time."""
# Requires historical sentiment data. For now, a placeholder.
return 0.1 # Slightly positive trend
def _calculate_fear_greed_index(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Calculate Fear & Greed Index for crypto markets based on various inputs."""
market_data = data.get('market_data', {})
sentiment_data = data.get('sentiment', {}) # Assumes sentiment data includes social/news scores
indicators = {}
# 1. Volatility (25% weight): High volatility often correlates with fear.
# Using historical price standard deviation as a proxy.
historical_returns = market_data.get('returns', [0.0])
if len(historical_returns) >= 30:
volatility = np.std(historical_returns[-30:]) * np.sqrt(365) # Annualized volatility
# Invert volatility's impact: lower volatility = higher score (more greed)
volatility_score = max(0, min(100, (0.5 - volatility) * 200 if volatility > 0 else 50))
else:
volatility_score = 50
indicators['volatility'] = volatility_score * 0.25
# 2. Market Momentum/Volume (25% weight): Strong upward momentum suggests greed.
# Ratio of current volume to average volume over the past 30 days.
volumes = market_data.get('volumes', [1.0])
if len(volumes) >= 30 and np.mean(volumes[-30:]) > 0:
volume_ratio = volumes[-1] / np.mean(volumes[-30:])
momentum_score = max(0, min(100, volume_ratio * 50)) # Map ratio to 0-100
else:
momentum_score = 50
indicators['momentum'] = momentum_score * 0.25
# 3. Social Media Sentiment (15% weight): Positive sentiment is greed, negative is fear.
# Using the aggregate sentiment score (-1 to 1) and mapping it to 0-100.
social_sentiment_score = sentiment_data.get('aggregate_sentiment', 0.0)
social_score = (social_sentiment_score + 1) * 50
indicators['social_media'] = social_score * 0.15
# 4. Market Cap Dominance (10% weight): Bitcoin dominance can indicate market stability (higher dominance = less fear for some).
dominance_score = market_data.get('btc_dominance', 50) # Assume 50% if not available
indicators['market_dominance'] = dominance_score * 0.10
# 5. Surveys (15% weight): Simulated using sentiment analysis as a proxy for investor surveys.
# Assuming positive sentiment reflects greed in surveys.
survey_score = (sentiment_data.get('aggregate_sentiment', 0.0) + 1) * 50
indicators['surveys'] = survey_score * 0.15
# 6. Google Trends (10% weight): Search interest for "buy bitcoin" or "crypto" can indicate FOMO (greed).
trends_score = market_data.get('google_trends_search_interest', 50) # Assume 50 if not available
indicators['google_trends'] = trends_score * 0.10
# Calculate the final Fear & Greed Index
fear_greed_index = sum(indicators.values())
# Classify the index value
classification = self.classify_fear_greed(fear_greed_index)
return {
'index': fear_greed_index,
'indicators': indicators,
'classification': classification
}
def classify_fear_greed(self, index: float) -> str:
"""Classify the Fear & Greed Index into categories."""
if index <= 25:
return "Extreme Fear"
elif index <= 45:
return "Fear"
elif index <= 55:
return "Neutral"
elif index <= 75:
return "Greed"
else:
return "Extreme Greed"
def _calculate_article_importance(self, article: Dict) -> float:
"""Calculate the importance weight of a news article."""
# Weight by source credibility, recency, and potential engagement metrics.
source_weight = {'coindesk': 1.0, 'cointelegraph': 0.9, 'decrypt': 0.8, 'theblock': 0.9}.get(article.get('source', ''), 0.7)
recency_days = (time.time() - article.get('published_at', time.time())) / (24 * 3600)
recency_weight = max(0.1, 1.0 / (1 + recency_days * 0.5)) # Decay weight over time
engagement_weight = article.get('engagement', 1) # Simplified engagement
return source_weight * recency_weight * engagement_weight
def _calculate_user_influence(self, user_info: Dict) -> float:
"""Estimate user influence based on follower count and engagement history."""
followers = user_info.get('followers', 100)
verified = user_info.get('verified', False)
# Normalize follower count and add bonus for verified status
influence = np.log1p(followers) / np.log1p(100000) # Log scale normalization for followers
if verified:
influence *= 1.5
return max(0.1, min(5.0, influence)) # Clamp influence between 0.1 and 5.0
def _get_platform_weight(self, platform: str) -> float:
"""Assign weights to different social media platforms based on perceived impact."""
weights = {
'twitter': 0.7,
'reddit': 0.5,
'telegram': 0.6,
'discord': 0.4
}
return weights.get(platform, 0.3)
Layer 3: Intelligent Integration Bridge
The integration layer serves as the critical bridge between off-chain AI computations and on-chain smart contract execution. This layer ensures that AI-generated trading signals are securely transmitted, validated, and executed on the blockchain while maintaining the integrity and transparency of the system. It utilizes Web3.js for interacting with the Ethereum blockchain and Chainlink for decentralized oracles, ensuring reliable data feeds.
// Integration layer using Node.js and Web3.js
const Web3 = require('web3');
const { ChainlinkPlugin } = require('@chainlink/web3-plugin'); // Assuming Chainlink integration
const abiDecoder = require('ethereum-abi-decoder'); // For decoding transaction data
// --- Smart Contract ABIs (Simplified for example) ---
const DelphiVaultABI = [
// ... functions like registerAIAgent, executeStrategy, etc.
{
"inputs": [
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "agentId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"internalType": "address", "name": "agentAddress", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "stakeAmount", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "string", "name": "specialization", "type": "string"}
],
"name": "registerAIAgent",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "agentId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "strategyId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "amount", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "address", "name": "tokenIn", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "address", "name": "tokenOut", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "minAmountOut", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "bytes", "name": "tradeData", "type": "bytes"}
],
"name": "executeStrategy",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "", "type": "bytes32"}],
"name": "aiAgents",
"outputs": [
{"internalType": "address", "name": "agentAddress", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "reputationScore", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "stakedTokens", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "successfulTrades", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "totalTrades", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "totalProfit", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "totalLoss", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "bool", "name": "isActive", "type": "bool"},
{"internalType": "string", "name": "specialization", "type": "string"}
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
{
"inputs": [{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "", "type": "bytes32"}],
"name": "strategies",
"outputs": [
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "strategyId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"internalType": "string", "name": "name", "type": "string"},
{"internalType": "address", "name": "strategyContract", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "allocatedFunds", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "totalReturns", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "riskScore", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "bool", "name": "isActive", "type": "bool"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "createdAt", "type": "uint256"}
],
"stateMutability": "view",
"type": "function"
},
// Event signatures for monitoring
{
"anonymous": false,
"inputs": [
{"indexed": true, "internalType": "bytes32", "name": "strategyId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"indexed": true, "internalType": "bytes32", "name": "agentId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"indexed": false, "internalType": "uint256", "name": "profit", "type": "uint256"}
],
"name": "StrategyExecuted",
"type": "event"
}
];
const DELPHI_VAULT_ADDRESS = '0x...'; // Replace with deployed contract address
const PROVIDER_URL = 'YOUR_ETHEREUM_NODE_URL'; // e.g., Infura, Alchemy
const RELAYER_PRIVATE_KEY = 'YOUR_RELAYER_PRIVATE_KEY'; // Securely manage this key!
class AIIntegrationBridge {
constructor() {
this.web3 = new Web3(PROVIDER_URL);
// Register Chainlink plugin if needed for external data feeds
// this.web3.registerPlugin(new ChainlinkPlugin());
this.delphiVaultContract = new this.web3.eth.Contract(DelphiVaultABI, DELPHI_VAULT_ADDRESS);
this.account = this.web3.eth.accounts.privateKeyToAccount(RELAYER_PRIVATE_KEY);
this.web3.eth.accounts.wallet.add(this.account);
this.relayerAddress = this.account.address;
this.activeAIAgents = new Map(); // Cache agent details for efficiency
this.transactionQueue = []; // Queue for pending on-chain transactions
this.processingInterval = null; // Interval for processing the queue
this.MAX_QUEUE_SIZE = 10; // Limit queue size to prevent memory issues
}
/**
* @dev Authenticate and register an AI agent.
* This would involve the AI agent's off-chain service signing a message
* proving its identity, which is then verified and the agent registered on-chain.
*/
async registerAIAgent(agentId, agentAddress, specialization, stakeAmount) {
// Placeholder: In a real scenario, agentAddress would be the service endpoint,
// and agentId would be derived from its public key or a registry.
// The agent would likely sign a nonce to prove ownership.
try {
const tx = await this.delphiVaultContract.methods.registerAIAgent(
agentId,
agentAddress,
this.web3.utils.toWei(stakeAmount.toString(), 'ether'), // Assuming stake is in ETH
specialization
).send({ from: this.relayerAddress });
console.log(`[Bridge] AI Agent ${agentId} registration initiated: ${tx.transactionHash}`);
// Cache agent details after successful registration
const agentInfo = await this.delphiVaultContract.methods.aiAgents(agentId).call();
this.activeAIAgents.set(agentId, { ...agentInfo, address: agentAddress });
return { success: true, transactionHash: tx.transactionHash };
} catch (error) {
console.error(`[Bridge] Failed to register AI Agent ${agentId}:`, error);
return { success: false, error: error.message };
}
}
/**
* @dev Queues an AI agent's trading signal for on-chain execution.
* The signal is first validated off-chain before being added to the queue.
*/
async queueTradingSignal(agentId, signal) {
if (this.transactionQueue.length >= this.MAX_QUEUE_SIZE) {
console.warn(`[Bridge] Transaction queue is full. Dropping signal for agent ${agentId}.`);
return { success: false, error: "Queue full" };
}
// Off-chain validation of the signal
const validationResult = this.validateSignal(agentId, signal);
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
console.warn(`[Bridge] Invalid signal from agent ${agentId}: ${validationResult.reason}. Signal:`, signal);
return { success: false, error: `Invalid signal: ${validationResult.reason}` };
}
const transactionData = {
agentId,
strategyId: signal.strategyId, // Assuming signal includes strategyId
amount: this.web3.utils.toWei(signal.tradeSize.toString(), 'ether'), // Convert trade size to wei
tokenIn: signal.tokenIn, // Address of input token
tokenOut: signal.tokenOut, // Address of output token
minAmountOut: this.web3.utils.toWei(signal.targetPrice.toString(), 'ether'), // Use target price as min amount out for simplicity
tradeData: signal.tradeData || '0x' // ABI encoded data for the strategy contract call, if needed
};
this.transactionQueue.push(transactionData);
console.log(`[Bridge] Signal from agent ${agentId} queued for execution.`);
// Start processing the queue if it's not already running
if (!this.processingInterval) {
this.startQueueProcessor();
}
return { success: true, message: "Signal queued successfully" };
}
/**
* @dev Off-chain validation of a trading signal.
* Checks for data integrity, agent status, and basic feasibility.
*/
validateSignal(agentId, signal) {
const agent = this.activeAIAgents.get(agentId);
if (!agent) {
return { isValid: false, reason: "Agent not registered or found" };
}
if (!agent.isActive) {
return { isValid: false, reason: "Agent is inactive" };
}
if (signal.confidence < 0.7) { // Minimum confidence threshold
return { isValid: false, reason: "Low signal confidence" };
}
if (!signal.strategyId || !signal.tokenIn || !signal.tokenOut || !signal.tradeSize || !signal.targetPrice) {
return { isValid: false, reason: "Missing required signal parameters" };
}
// Add checks for token address validity, target price feasibility etc.
return { isValid: true, reason: "" };
}
/**
* @dev Starts a periodic processor for the transaction queue.
* This function processes queued transactions in batches to optimize gas usage.
*/
startQueueProcessor() {
this.processingInterval = setInterval(async () => {
if (this.transactionQueue.length > 0) {
// Process in batches to manage gas costs and transaction complexity
const batchSize = 5; // Number of transactions to bundle per on-chain call
const batch = this.transactionQueue.splice(0, batchSize);
try {
// Prepare the batch transaction data
const batchCalls = batch.map(txData => {
return this.delphiVaultContract.methods.executeStrategy(
txData.agentId,
txData.strategyId,
txData.amount,
txData.tokenIn,
txData.tokenOut,
txData.minAmountOut,
txData.tradeData
);
});
// Estimate gas for the batch call
const estimatedGas = await this.delphiVaultContract.methods.executeStrategy(
batch[0].agentId, batch[0].strategyId, batch[0].amount, batch[0].tokenIn, batch[0].tokenOut, batch[0].minAmountOut, batch[0].tradeData
).estimateGas({ from: this.relayerAddress }); // Estimate for a single call, batching might be more complex
// A more sophisticated approach would use a multi-call contract or a single batch call if the contract supports it.
// For simplicity, let's assume executeStrategy can handle a batch or we execute sequentially.
// Here we simulate sequential execution for clarity.
for (const txData of batch) {
const tx = await this.delphiVaultContract.methods.executeStrategy(
txData.agentId,
txData.strategyId,
txData.amount,
txData.tokenIn,
txData.tokenOut,
txData.minAmountOut,
txData.tradeData
).send({ from: this.relayerAddress, gas: estimatedGas * 1.2 }); // Add buffer
console.log(`[Bridge] Executed strategy for agent ${txData.agentId} in tx: ${tx.transactionHash}`);
// Log successful execution and potentially update agent reputation via events
}
} catch (error) {
console.error("[Bridge] Error processing transaction batch:", error);
// Handle errors: re-queue failed transactions, update agent reputation, etc.
// For simplicity, failed transactions are not re-queued here.
}
} else {
// Stop the interval if the queue is empty for a period
if (this.processingInterval) {
clearInterval(this.processingInterval);
this.processingInterval = null;
}
}
}, 15000); // Check queue every 15 seconds
}
/**
* @dev Fetches and decodes events emitted by the Delphi Vault contract.
* This is crucial for monitoring agent performance and strategy execution.
*/
async monitorEvents() {
const subscription = this.web3.eth.subscribe('logs', {
address: DELPHI_VAULT_ADDRESS,
topics: [this.web3.utils.sha3('StrategyExecuted(bytes32,bytes32,uint256)')] // Topic for StrategyExecuted event
}, (error, result) => {
if (error) {
console.error("Error subscribing to logs:", error);
return;
}
try {
// Decode the log data using the contract ABI
const decodedLog = abiDecoder.decodeLogs([
{ // Simplified event structure for decoding
"anonymous": false,
"inputs": [
{"indexed": true, "internalType": "bytes32", "name": "strategyId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"indexed": true, "internalType": "bytes32", "name": "agentId", "type": "bytes32"},
{"indexed": false, "internalType": "uint256", "name": "profit", "type": "uint256"}
],
"name": "StrategyExecuted",
"type": "event"
}
], result)[0];
console.log(`[Bridge] Strategy Executed Event: AgentID=${decodedLog.agentId}, Profit=${this.web3.utils.fromWei(decodedLog.profit.toString(), 'ether')}`);
// Here you would update agent reputation or performance metrics based on the event
} catch (decodeError) {
console.error("Error decoding log:", decodeError);
}
});
subscription.on('error', (error) => {
console.error("Subscription error:", error);
});
console.log("[Bridge] Monitoring Delphi Vault events...");
}
stopQueueProcessor() {
if (this.processingInterval) {
clearInterval(this.processingInterval);
this.processingInterval = null;
console.log("[Bridge] Queue processor stopped.");
}
}
}
// Example Usage:
// const bridge = new AIIntegrationBridge();
// bridge.monitorEvents(); // Start monitoring events
// Simulate an AI agent sending a signal
// setTimeout(() => {
// const sampleSignal = {
// agentId: '0x...', // Agent's unique ID
// strategyId: '0x...', // Strategy's unique ID
// tokenIn: '0x...', // Input token address (e.g., WETH)
// tokenOut: '0x...', // Output token address (e.g., DAI)
// tradeSize: 0.5, // Amount of tokenIn to trade (e.g., 0.5 WETH)
// targetPrice: 3500, // Target price for tokenOut (e.g., DAI per WETH)
// confidence: 0.85,
// tradeData: '0x...' // Optional: ABI encoded data for complex trades
// };
// bridge.queueTradingSignal(sampleSignal.agentId, sampleSignal);
// }, 5000);
Layer 4: Data Intelligence Hub
The Data Intelligence Hub aggregates and processes vast amounts of market data from multiple sources, providing the AI agents with the comprehensive information needed for intelligent decision-making. This includes real-time price feeds, historical data, order book information, on-chain transaction data, and sentiment data from news and social media.
Multi-Agent AI Ecosystem {#multi-agent-ecosystem}
Specialized AI Agent Architecture
The heart of Delphi Ventures lies in its Multi-Agent AI Ecosystem – a sophisticated network of specialized artificial intelligence agents, each designed with unique capabilities and expertise areas. This approach mirrors the way successful hedge funds employ teams of specialists, but with the added benefits of 24/7 operation, emotional neutrality, and continuous learning. The collaboration and competition between these agents form the basis of Collective Intelligence Trading.
1. Momentum Hunter: The Trend Specialist
The Momentum Hunter is designed to identify and capitalize on market trends across multiple timeframes. This agent employs advanced technical analysis, pattern recognition, and momentum indicators to detect potential breakout opportunities. Its ability to operate across various time scales allows it to adapt to both short-term fluctuations and long-term market movements.
Core Capabilities:
- Multi-timeframe momentum analysis (1m to 1W)
- Advanced pattern recognition using computer vision on price charts
- Volume-weighted momentum calculations for conviction
- Fibonacci retracement and extension analysis for target setting
- Elliott Wave pattern identification for cyclical analysis
Technical Implementation (Conceptual):
# (Continuing from the SentimentSage example)
class MomentumHunter(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("momentum_hunter")
# Load pre-trained models for pattern recognition if using ML-based approaches
# self.pattern_recognizer = PatternRecognitionCNN(model_path='path/to/cnn_model')
self.momentum_indicators = MomentumIndicatorSuite() # A suite of technical indicators
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Specialized momentum analysis."""
prices = np.array(data['prices'])
volumes = np.array(data['volumes'])
indicator_values = {}
# Calculate various technical indicators
for period in [5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200]:
if len(prices) >= period:
# Rate of Change (ROC)
roc = (prices[-1] - prices[-period]) / prices[-period]
indicator_values[f'roc_{period}'] = roc
# Relative Strength Index (RSI)
rsi = self.momentum_indicators.calculate_rsi(prices, period)
indicator_values[f'rsi_{period}'] = rsi
# Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
macd, signal, hist = self.momentum_indicators.calculate_macd(prices)
if hist:
indicator_values[f'macd_hist_{period}'] = hist[-1]
# Volume Moving Average
if len(volumes) >= period:
avg_vol = np.mean(volumes[-period:])
indicator_values[f'avg_vol_{period}'] = avg_vol
# Pattern Recognition (can be rule-based or ML-based)
# Example: Identify Ascending Triangle pattern
# pattern_analysis = await self.pattern_recognizer.detect_patterns(prices[-50:]) # Use last 50 data points
# if pattern_analysis and pattern_analysis['type'] == 'ascending_triangle':
# indicator_values['pattern'] = 'ascending_triangle'
# indicator_values['pattern_target'] = pattern_analysis['target_price']
# indicator_values['pattern_stop_loss'] = pattern_analysis['stop_loss']
# Composite Momentum Score
momentum_score = self._calculate_composite_momentum(indicator_values)
indicator_values['momentum_score'] = momentum_score
# Determine trade parameters based on analysis
target_price, stop_loss, trade_size_percentage = self._determine_trade_parameters(indicator_values, prices)
indicator_values['target_price'] = target_price
indicator_values['stop_loss'] = stop_loss
indicator_values['trade_size_percentage'] = trade_size_percentage
return indicator_values
def _calculate_composite_momentum(self, indicators: Dict) -> float:
"""Calculates a composite score from various momentum indicators."""
score = 0
# Example weighting:
score += indicators.get('roc_20', 0) * 0.3
score += (indicators.get('rsi_20', 50) - 50) / 50 * 0.2 # Normalize RSI contribution
score += indicators.get('macd_hist_20', 0) * 0.25
score += (indicators.get('avg_vol_20', 1) - np.mean(self.momentum_indicators.get_volume_history(20, 40))) / np.mean(self.momentum_indicators.get_volume_history(20, 40)) * 0.25 if self.momentum_indicators.get_volume_history(20, 40) else 0
return np.clip(score, -1, 1) # Clamp between -1 and 1
def _determine_trade_parameters(self, indicators: Dict, prices: np.ndarray) -> Tuple[float, float, float]:
"""Determines target price, stop loss, and trade size percentage."""
target_price = None
stop_loss = None
trade_size = 0.01 # Default 1% of capital
momentum_score = indicators.get('momentum_score', 0)
if momentum_score > 0.7: # Strong bullish momentum
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.03) # 3% target
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.015) # 1.5% stop loss
trade_size = 0.02 # Increase trade size for strong conviction
elif momentum_score < -0.7: # Strong bearish momentum
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.03)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.015)
trade_size = 0.02
elif 0.4 < momentum_score < 0.7: # Moderate bullish momentum
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.015)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.01)
trade_size = 0.01
elif -0.7 < momentum_score < -0.4: # Moderate bearish momentum
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.015)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.01)
trade_size = 0.01
# Adjust parameters based on pattern recognition if available
# if indicators.get('pattern') == 'ascending_triangle':
# target_price = indicators.get('pattern_target', target_price)
# stop_loss = indicators.get('pattern_stop_loss', stop_loss)
return target_price, stop_loss, trade_size
# Helper class for momentum indicators (conceptual)
class MomentumIndicatorSuite:
def calculate_rsi(self, prices, period):
# Implementation of RSI calculation
return 50.0 # Placeholder
def calculate_macd(self, prices):
# Implementation of MACD calculation
return [0], [0], [0] # Placeholder
def get_volume_history(self, period, lookback):
# Fetches historical volume data
return [100] * lookback # Placeholder
Real-World Performance Example:
In traditional markets, momentum-based strategies have shown consistent performance. Renaissance Technologies' Medallion Fund, which heavily employs momentum and statistical arbitrage strategies, has generated average annual returns of 39% over three decades. The Momentum Hunter agent aims to replicate and enhance such strategies in the DeFi space, adapting them to the unique dynamics of cryptocurrency markets.
2. Sentiment Sage: The Market Psychology Expert
The Sentiment Sage specializes in analyzing market psychology through natural language processing, social media sentiment, and behavioral indicators. This agent understands that markets are driven by human emotions and seeks to quantify and capitalize on sentiment-driven price movements. Its ability to process vast amounts of unstructured text data allows it to gauge the "mood" of the market.
Core Capabilities:
- Real-time sentiment analysis across multiple social platforms (Twitter, Reddit, Telegram)
- News sentiment scoring with source credibility weighting
- Fear & Greed index calculation from multiple inputs
- Whale activity correlation with sentiment shifts
- Regulatory sentiment impact assessment on asset prices
Advanced NLP Pipeline (Conceptual):
# (Continuing from previous examples)
from transformers import AutoModel, AutoTokenizer
import time # For time-related calculations
class SentimentSage(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("sentiment_sage")
# Load a pre-trained FinBERT model for financial text sentiment analysis
self.sentiment_analyzer = pipeline("sentiment-analysis", model="ProsusAI/finbert")
self.social_apis = {
'twitter': TwitterAPI(), # Placeholder for Twitter API interaction
'reddit': RedditAPI(), # Placeholder for Reddit API interaction
'telegram': TelegramAPI(), # Placeholder for Telegram interaction
'discord': DiscordAPI() # Placeholder for Discord interaction
}
self.news_api = NewsAPI() # Placeholder for news aggregation API
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Multi-modal sentiment analysis across news and social media."""
sentiment_results = {}
# Fetch and analyze News Data
news_articles = data.get('news_data', [])
if not news_articles:
# Attempt to fetch recent news if not provided
# news_articles = await self.news_api.get_recent_articles(keywords=['crypto', 'bitcoin', data.get('symbol', '')])
pass # Skip if no news data available
news_sentiment = await self._analyze_news_sentiment(news_articles)
sentiment_results['news'] = news_sentiment
# Fetch and analyze Social Media Data
social_mentions = data.get('social_data', {})
if not social_mentions:
# Attempt to fetch recent social mentions
# for platform, api in self.social_apis.items():
# social_mentions[platform] = await api.get_mentions(keywords=['crypto', 'bitcoin', data.get('symbol', '')])
pass # Skip if no social data available
social_sentiment = await self._analyze_social_sentiment(social_mentions)
sentiment_results['social'] = social_sentiment
# Combine sentiment with market data for Fear & Greed Index
market_data = data.get('market_data', {})
fear_greed_data = self._calculate_fear_greed_index(market_data, sentiment_results)
sentiment_results['market_indicators'] = fear_greed_data
# Calculate overall aggregate sentiment
aggregate_sentiment = self._calculate_aggregate_sentiment(sentiment_results)
sentiment_results['aggregate_sentiment'] = aggregate_sentiment
# Determine trade parameters based on sentiment
target_price, stop_loss, trade_size_percentage = self._determine_trade_parameters(sentiment_results, market_data.get('prices', [0]))
sentiment_results['target_price'] = target_price
sentiment_results['stop_loss'] = stop_loss
sentiment_results['trade_size_percentage'] = trade_size_percentage
return sentiment_results
async def _analyze_news_sentiment(self, news_data: List[Dict]) -> Dict:
"""Analyzes sentiment of news articles, considering source and recency."""
sentiments = []
weights = []
for article in news_data:
try:
headline_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(article['headline'])[0]
content_snippet = article['content'][:512] if len(article['content']) > 512 else article['content']
content_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(content_snippet)[0]
sentiment_map = {'POSITIVE': 1, 'NEUTRAL': 0, 'NEGATIVE': -1}
score = sentiment_map.get(headline_sentiment['label'], 0) * 0.3 + sentiment_map.get(content_sentiment['label'], 0) * 0.7
# Weight by source credibility and recency
source_weight = {'coindesk': 1.0, 'cointelegraph': 0.9, 'decrypt': 0.8, 'theblock': 0.9}.get(article.get('source', ''), 0.7)
recency_days = (time.time() - article.get('published_at', time.time())) / (24 * 3600)
recency_weight = max(0.1, 1.0 / (1 + recency_days * 0.5))
weights.append(source_weight * recency_weight)
sentiments.append(score)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error analyzing news article: {e}")
if not sentiments:
return {'score': 0, 'confidence': 0, 'count': 0}
# Normalize weights and calculate weighted average
total_weight = sum(weights)
normalized_weights = [w / total_weight for w in weights] if total_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(weights)]*len(weights)
avg_sentiment = np.average(sentiments, weights=normalized_weights)
variance = np.var(sentiments) if len(sentiments) > 1 else 0
confidence = max(0, 1 - variance * 5) # Higher variance means lower confidence
return {'score': avg_sentiment, 'confidence': confidence, 'count': len(sentiments)}
async def _analyze_social_sentiment(self, social_data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Analyzes sentiment from various social media platforms."""
all_sentiments = []
all_weights = []
for platform, mentions in social_data.items():
platform_sentiments = []
platform_weights = []
for mention in mentions:
try:
text_sentiment = self.sentiment_analyzer(mention['text'][:280])[0]
sentiment_map = {'POSITIVE': 1, 'NEUTRAL': 0, 'NEGATIVE': -1}
score = sentiment_map.get(text_sentiment['label'], 0)
# Weight by user influence and mention engagement
user_influence = self._get_user_influence(mention.get('user_info', {}))
engagement = mention.get('engagement', 1)
platform_sentiments.append(score)
platform_weights.append(user_influence * engagement)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error analyzing social mention: {e}")
if platform_sentiments:
total_platform_weight = sum(platform_weights)
normalized_platform_weights = [w / total_platform_weight for w in platform_weights] if total_platform_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(platform_weights)]*len(platform_weights)
avg_platform_sentiment = np.average(platform_sentiments, weights=normalized_platform_weights)
all_sentiments.append(avg_platform_sentiment)
# Weight platform contributions to overall sentiment
all_weights.append(self._get_platform_weight(platform))
if not all_sentiments:
return {'score': 0, 'confidence': 0, 'platform_contributions': {}}
total_weight = sum(all_weights)
normalized_weights = [w / total_weight for w in all_weights] if total_weight > 0 else [1.0/len(all_weights)]*len(all_weights)
agg_sentiment = np.average(all_sentiments, weights=normalized_weights)
variance = np.var(all_sentiments) if len(all_sentiments) > 1 else 0
confidence = max(0, 1 - variance * 3) # Lower variance implies higher confidence
return {'score': agg_sentiment, 'confidence': confidence, 'platform_contributions': dict(zip(self.social_apis.keys(), all_sentiments))}
def _calculate_aggregate_sentiment(self, results: Dict) -> float:
"""Combines sentiment scores from news, social, and market indicators."""
weights = {'news': 0.5, 'social': 0.3, 'market_indicators': 0.2}
total_score = 0
total_weight = 0
# Weighted average of news and social sentiment, incorporating their confidence
if results.get('news') and results['news']['count'] > 0:
total_score += results['news']['score'] * results['news']['confidence'] * weights['news']
total_weight += results['news']['confidence'] * weights['news']
if results.get('social') and results['social']['count'] > 0:
total_score += results['social']['score'] * results['social']['confidence'] * weights['social']
total_weight += results['social']['confidence'] * weights['social']
# Add market indicators (Fear & Greed Index), normalized
if results.get('market_indicators'):
fear_greed_index = results['market_indicators']['index']
# Normalize Fear & Greed (0-100) to (-1 to 1) similar to sentiment scores
normalized_fg = (fear_greed_index - 50) / 50
total_score += normalized_fg * weights['market_indicators']
total_weight += weights['market_indicators']
if total_weight == 0: return 0.0
final_score = total_score / total_weight
return np.clip(final_score, -1, 1) # Ensure score is between -1 and 1
def _calculate_fear_greed_index(self, market_data: Dict, sentiment_results: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Calculates the Fear & Greed Index."""
indicators = {}
# Weights for each indicator component
comp_weights = {'volatility': 0.25, 'momentum': 0.25, 'social': 0.15, 'dominance': 0.10, 'surveys': 0.15, 'trends': 0.10}
# 1. Volatility (25%)
returns = market_data.get('returns', [])
if len(returns) >= 30:
volatility = np.std(returns[-30:]) * np.sqrt(365)
volatility_score = max(0, min(100, (0.5 - volatility) * 200 if volatility > 0 else 50))
else: volatility_score = 50
indicators['volatility'] = volatility_score * comp_weights['volatility']
# 2. Momentum (25%)
volumes = market_data.get('volumes', [])
if len(volumes) >= 30 and np.mean(volumes[-30:]) > 0:
momentum_score = max(0, min(100, (volumes[-1] / np.mean(volumes[-30:])) * 50))
else: momentum_score = 50
indicators['momentum'] = momentum_score * comp_weights['momentum']
# 3. Social Sentiment (15%) - Use aggregate sentiment score from SentimentSage
social_score = (sentiment_results.get('aggregate_sentiment', 0.0) + 1) * 50
indicators['social'] = social_score * comp_weights['social']
# 4. Market Dominance (10%) - Bitcoin Dominance
dominance = market_data.get('btc_dominance', 50)
indicators['dominance'] = dominance * comp_weights['dominance']
# 5. Surveys (15%) - Simulated via sentiment
survey_score = (sentiment_results.get('aggregate_sentiment', 0.0) + 1) * 50
indicators['surveys'] = survey_score * comp_weights['surveys']
# 6. Google Trends (10%)
trends = market_data.get('google_trends_search_interest', 50)
indicators['trends'] = trends * comp_weights['trends']
final_index = sum(indicators.values())
classification = self.classify_fear_greed(final_index)
return {'index': final_index, 'indicators': indicators, 'classification': classification}
def classify_fear_greed(self, index):
if index <= 25: return "Extreme Fear"
elif index <= 45: return "Fear"
elif index <= 55: return "Neutral"
elif index <= 75: return "Greed"
else: return "Extreme Greed"
def _get_user_influence(self, user_info: Dict) -> float:
"""Estimates user influence based on followers and verification status."""
followers = user_info.get('followers', 100)
verified = user_info.get('verified', False)
# Logarithmic scaling for followers to avoid extreme values
influence = np.log1p(followers) / np.log1p(100000)
if verified: influence *= 1.5
return np.clip(influence, 0.1, 5.0)
def _get_platform_weight(self, platform: str) -> float:
"""Assigns weights to social platforms based on their perceived impact."""
weights = {'twitter': 0.7, 'reddit': 0.5, 'telegram': 0.6, 'discord': 0.4}
return weights.get(platform, 0.3)
def _determine_trade_parameters(self, sentiment: Dict, prices: List[float]) -> Tuple[float, float, float]:
"""Determines trade parameters based on sentiment analysis."""
target_price = None
stop_loss = None
trade_size = 0.005 # Default 0.5% of capital
agg_sentiment = sentiment.get('aggregate_sentiment', 0)
confidence = sentiment.get('confidence', 0.5)
# Adjust trade size based on confidence and sentiment strength
if abs(agg_sentiment) > 0.5 and confidence > 0.7:
trade_size *= 2.0 # Double trade size for strong, confident sentiment
elif abs(agg_sentiment) > 0.2 and confidence > 0.6:
trade_size *= 1.5 # Increase trade size moderately
if agg_sentiment > 0.5: # Strong positive sentiment (Greed)
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.02 * confidence)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.01 * confidence)
elif agg_sentiment < -0.5: # Strong negative sentiment (Fear)
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.02 * confidence)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.01 * confidence)
elif agg_sentiment > 0.2: # Mild positive sentiment
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.01 * confidence)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.005 * confidence)
elif agg_sentiment < -0.2: # Mild negative sentiment
target_price = prices[-1] * (1 - 0.01 * confidence)
stop_loss = prices[-1] * (1 + 0.005 * confidence)
return target_price, stop_loss, trade_size
# Placeholder classes for external APIs (replace with actual implementations)
class TwitterAPI: async def get_mentions(self, keywords): return []
class RedditAPI: async def get_mentions(self, keywords): return []
class TelegramAPI: async def get_mentions(self, keywords): return []
class DiscordAPI: async def get_mentions(self, keywords): return []
class NewsAPI: async def get_recent_articles(self, keywords): return []
3. Risk Guardian: The Portfolio Protector
The Risk Guardian serves as the defensive specialist of the AI collective, focusing on risk management, position sizing, and portfolio protection. This agent employs sophisticated risk models and real-time monitoring to prevent catastrophic losses, ensuring the long-term survival and growth of the fund's capital.
Core Capabilities:
- Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional VaR (CVaR) calculations across multiple timeframes
- Dynamic position sizing based on volatility and risk tolerance
- Correlation analysis and portfolio diversification strategies
- Black swan event detection and mitigation planning
- Automated stop-loss and take-profit optimization based on risk metrics
Risk Management Framework (Conceptual):
# (Continuing from previous examples)
class RiskGuardian(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("risk_guardian")
self.risk_models = {
'var': ValueAtRiskModel(), # Placeholder for VaR model
'cvar': ConditionalVaRModel(), # Placeholder for CVaR model
'monte_carlo': MonteCarloSimulation(), # Placeholder for Monte Carlo simulation
}
self.max_position_allocation = 0.10 # Max 10% of capital per trade
self.target_volatility = 0.05 # Target annualized portfolio volatility
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Assesses portfolio risk and determines optimal trade parameters."""
portfolio_state = data.get('portfolio_state', {})
market_data = data.get('market_data', {})
# Calculate portfolio-level risk metrics
portfolio_risk_metrics = self._assess_portfolio_risk(portfolio_state, market_data)
# Determine optimal trade size based on risk tolerance and signal conviction
signal_conviction = data.get('signal_conviction', 0.5)
signal_risk = data.get('signal_risk', 0.01) # Estimated risk of the specific trade signal
optimal_trade_size_pct = self._calculate_optimal_position_size(
portfolio_risk_metrics,
signal_conviction,
signal_risk,
portfolio_state.get('total_value', 1000000) # Assume $1M portfolio value if not provided
)
# Extract relevant trade parameters from the signal (e.g., from MomentumHunter or SentimentSage)
target_price = data.get('target_price')
stop_loss = data.get('stop_loss')
return {
'portfolio_risk': portfolio_risk_metrics,
'optimal_trade_size_pct': optimal_trade_size_pct,
'target_price': target_price,
'stop_loss': stop_loss
}
def _assess_portfolio_risk(self, portfolio: Dict, market_data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Calculates key risk metrics for the current portfolio."""
metrics = {}
# 1. Value-at-Risk (VaR) - e.g., 1-day 95% VaR
# Requires historical portfolio returns or simulation
# VaR_1d_95 = self.risk_models['var'].calculate(portfolio.positions, market_data.historical_returns)
VaR_1d_95 = 0.015 # Example: 1.5% daily VaR
metrics['VaR_1d_95'] = VaR_1d_95
metrics['max_drawdown_potential'] = VaR_1d_95 * 3 # Estimate potential drawdown
# 2. Conditional VaR (CVaR) - Expected loss given VaR breach
# CVaR_1d_95 = self.risk_models['cvar'].calculate(...)
CVaR_1d_95 = 0.02 # Example: 2% CVaR
metrics['CVaR_1d_95'] = CVaR_1d_95
# 3. Portfolio Volatility
# portfolio_volatility = self.risk_models['monte_carlo'].calculate_volatility(...)
portfolio_volatility = 0.30 # Example: 30% annualized volatility
metrics['annualized_volatility'] = portfolio_volatility
# 4. Concentration Risk
# Calculate concentration based on the largest position size relative to total portfolio value
# max_pos_pct = max(pos.value / portfolio.total_value for pos in portfolio.positions)
max_pos_pct = 0.15 # Example: 15% largest position
metrics['concentration_risk'] = max_pos_pct
# 5. Correlation Analysis (if multiple positions)
# correlation_matrix = self.calculate_correlation_matrix(...)
# avg_correlation = np.mean(correlation_matrix)
avg_correlation = 0.6 # Example average correlation
metrics['average_correlation'] = avg_correlation
return metrics
def _calculate_optimal_position_size(self, risk_metrics: Dict, conviction: float, signal_risk: float, portfolio_value: float) -> float:
"""Calculates optimal trade size as a percentage of portfolio value."""
# Start with base allocation and adjust based on conviction and risk
base_allocation = self.max_position_allocation * conviction # Allocate more for higher conviction
# Adjust for portfolio volatility vs target volatility
vol_adjustment = min(1.0, self.target_volatility / risk_metrics.get('annualized_volatility', self.target_volatility))
# Adjust for concentration risk
concentration_adjustment = max(0.0, 1.0 - risk_metrics.get('concentration_risk', 0.0))
# Adjust for signal risk (higher risk signals get smaller allocation)
# Example: Kelly Criterion-like approach (simplified)
# Assume win rate = conviction, loss rate = 1 - conviction
# win_amount = signal_risk * 2 # Assume 2:1 reward/risk ratio
# loss_amount = signal_risk
# kelly_fraction = (conviction * (win_amount / loss_amount) - (1 - conviction)) / (win_amount / loss_amount) if loss_amount > 0 else conviction
# kelly_fraction = np.clip(kelly_fraction, 0, 0.5) # Limit Kelly to 50% for safety
# Simplified calculation: Adjust base allocation by conviction, volatility, and concentration
optimal_pct = base_allocation * vol_adjustment * concentration_adjustment
# Ensure position size doesn't exceed maximum allocation or cause excessive risk
# For example, ensure risk per trade does not exceed a certain percentage of portfolio (e.g., 1%)
risk_per_trade = optimal_pct * portfolio_value * signal_risk
max_risk_per_trade_value = portfolio_value * 0.01 # Limit risk to 1% of portfolio
if risk_per_trade > max_risk_per_trade_value and signal_risk > 0:
optimal_pct = (max_risk_per_trade_value / portfolio_value) / signal_risk
return np.clip(optimal_pct, 0.001, self.max_position_allocation) # Clamp between 0.1% and 10%
4. Arbitrage Scout: The Opportunity Hunter
The Arbitrage Scout is designed to identify and capitalize on price discrepancies across different exchanges, protocols, and asset pairs. This agent operates with lightning-fast execution to capture fleeting arbitrage opportunities, a strategy that has been a cornerstone of quantitative trading for decades.
Core Capabilities:
- Cross-exchange arbitrage detection (e.g., BTC on Binance vs. Coinbase)
- Triangular arbitrage across trading pairs within a single exchange (e.g., BTC -> ETH -> USDT -> BTC)
- Flash loan arbitrage opportunities leveraging DeFi lending protocols
- Yield farming arbitrage across different liquidity pools and staking opportunities
- Cross-chain arbitrage detection, capitalizing on bridging solutions
Arbitrage Detection Engine (Conceptual):
# (Continuing from previous examples)
class ArbitrageScout(BaseAIAgent):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("arbitrage_scout")
self.exchanges = {
'uniswap_v3': UniswapV3API(), # Placeholder for DEX API
'pancakeswap': PancakeSwapAPI(), # Placeholder
'sushiswap': SushiSwapAPI(), # Placeholder
'binance': BinanceAPI(), # Placeholder for CEX API
'coinbase': CoinbaseAPI() # Placeholder
}
self.min_profit_threshold = 0.001 # 0.1% minimum profit after fees
self.gas_limit_buffer = 1.5 # 50% buffer for gas estimations
async def analyze_market_data(self, data: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Scans for arbitrage opportunities and determines trade parameters."""
opportunities = []
# Fetch real-time price and liquidity data
price_data = data.get('price_data', {}) # Expected format: {'ETH/USDC': {'binance': {'buy': price, 'sell': price, 'liquidity': X}, 'uniswap': {...}}}
# Cross-Exchange Arbitrage
cross_exchange_ops = self._find_cross_exchange_arbitrage(price_data)
opportunities.extend(cross_exchange_ops)
# Triangular Arbitrage (within specific exchanges)
# Requires detailed order book or swap router data per exchange
# triangular_ops = await self._find_triangular_arbitrage(price_data)
# opportunities.extend(triangular_ops)
# Flash Loan Arbitrage (requires integration with lending protocols)
# flash_loan_ops = await self._find_flash_loan_arbitrage(data)
# opportunities.extend(flash_loan_ops)
# Filter and Rank Opportunities
profitable_ops = [op for op in opportunities if op['estimated_profit_after_fees'] > self.min_profit_threshold * op['trade_size']]
# Rank by profitability and urgency (shorter execution time = more urgent)
ranked_ops = sorted(profitable_ops, key=lambda x: (x['estimated_profit_after_fees'], -x['execution_time_estimate']), reverse=True)
# Select the best opportunity
best_opportunity = ranked_ops[0] if ranked_ops else None
if best_opportunity:
# Convert parameters for the signal output
trade_size_pct = best_opportunity['trade_size'] / data.get('portfolio_state', {}).get('total_value', 1000000)
return {
'target_price': best_opportunity['buy_price'] if best_opportunity['type'] == 'cross_exchange' else best_opportunity['sell_price'], # Simplification
'stop_loss': None, # Arbitrage is usually closed once the price converges
'trade_size_percentage': trade_size_pct,
'arbitrage_type': best_opportunity['type'],
'profitability': best_opportunity['estimated_profit_after_fees']
}
else:
return {'target_price': None, 'stop_loss': None, 'trade_size_percentage': 0}
def _find_cross_exchange_arbitrage(self, price_data: Dict) -> List[Dict]:
"""Identifies arbitrage opportunities between different exchanges for major pairs."""
opportunities = []
# Example: ETH/USDC pair across Binance and Uniswap V3
eth_usdc_data = price_data.get('ETH/USDC', {})
if 'binance' in eth_usdc_data and 'uniswap_v3' in eth_usdc_data:
binance = eth_usdc_data['binance']
uniswap = eth_usdc_data['uniswap_v3']
# Scenario 1: Buy ETH cheaper on Binance, sell on Uniswap
if binance.get('sell') < uniswap.get('buy'):
buy_price = binance['sell'] # Price to buy ETH on Binance
sell_price = uniswap['buy'] # Price to sell ETH on Uniswap
price_diff = (sell_price - buy_price) / buy_price
if price_diff > self.min_profit_threshold:
# Determine trade size based on available liquidity and capital
# Assume capital is $100,000 for this example trade
trade_capital = 100000
eth_amount = trade_capital / buy_price
# Liquidity constraints need to be considered realistically
# available_liquidity_binance = binance.get('liquidity', float('inf'))
# available_liquidity_uniswap = uniswap.get('liquidity', float('inf'))
# Estimate fees (trading fees, gas costs)
trading_fee_binance = 0.00075 # Example fee
trading_fee_uniswap = 0.0003 # Example LP fee
gas_cost_eth = 0.0005 # Estimated gas cost in ETH
gas_price_usd = 3000 # Example gas price in USD
gross_profit = price_diff * eth_amount * buy_price
fees = (trading_fee_binance * eth_amount * buy_price) + \
(trading_fee_uniswap * eth_amount * buy_price) + \
(gas_cost_eth * gas_price_usd)
net_profit = gross_profit - fees
if net_profit > 0:
opportunities.append({
'type': 'cross_exchange',
'pair': 'ETH/USDC',
'buy_exchange': 'binance',
'sell_exchange': 'uniswap_v3',
'buy_price': buy_price,
'sell_price': sell_price,
'price_difference': price_diff,
'trade_size': eth_amount * buy_price, # USD value of ETH traded
'estimated_profit_after_fees': net_profit,
'execution_time_estimate': 5 # Estimated seconds to execute
})
# Scenario 2: Buy ETH cheaper on Uniswap, sell on Binance (reverse logic)
if uniswap.get('sell') < binance.get('buy'):
# Similar calculation as above, just reversed
pass
return opportunities
# Placeholder for other arbitrage finding methods
async def _find_triangular_arbitrage(self, price_data: Dict) -> List[Dict]: return []
async def _find_flash_loan_arbitrage(self, data: Dict) -> List[Dict]: return []
# Placeholder classes for exchange APIs
class BinanceAPI: async def get_price_and_liquidity(self, pair): return {'sell': 100, 'buy': 100.1, 'liquidity': 50000}
class CoinbaseAPI: async def get_price_and_liquidity(self, pair): return {'sell': 100.1, 'buy': 100.2, 'liquidity': 45000}
class UniswapV3API: async def get_price_and_liquidity(self, pair): return {'buy': 100.05, 'sell': 100.15, 'liquidity': 60000} # Simplified representation
class PancakeSwapAPI: async def get_price_and_liquidity(self, pair): return {'buy': 100.08, 'sell': 100.18, 'liquidity': 55000}
class SushiSwapAPI: async def get_price_and_liquidity(self, pair): return {'buy': 100.06, 'sell': 100.16, 'liquidity': 58000}
5. Yield Optimizer: The DeFi Farming Specialist
The Yield Optimizer specializes in discovering and managing yield farming opportunities across the DeFi ecosystem. This agent continuously monitors yield rates, pool compositions, and farming incentives to maximize returns while managing impermanent loss risks, a key challenge in providing liquidity.
Core Capabilities:
- Real-time yield rate monitoring across 50+ protocols (e.g., Aave, Compound, Curve, Yearn)
- Impermanent loss calculation and hedging strategies
- Auto-compounding strategies to maximize APY
- Liquidity mining optimization across various platforms
- Cross-protocol yield farming strategies for complex multi-stage gains
Smart Contract Infrastructure {#smart-contracts}
Modular Vault Architecture
The Delphi Ventures protocol employs a sophisticated modular vault architecture that enables flexible strategy deployment, secure fund management, and transparent operations. This architecture is designed to be upgradeable, secure, and gas-efficient, adhering to best practices in smart contract development.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/proxy/utils/Initializable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/security/ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/access/AccessControlUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/security/PausableUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol";
/**
* @title DelphiVault
* @dev Main vault contract for AI-powered trading strategies
*/
contract DelphiVault is
Initializable,
ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable,
AccessControlUpgradeable,
PausableUpgradeable
{
using SafeERC20 for IERC20;
// Role definitions for access control
bytes32 public constant AI_AGENT_ROLE = keccak256("AI_AGENT_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE = keccak256("STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant EMERGENCY_ROLE = keccak256("EMERGENCY_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant ORACLE_ROLE = keccak256("ORACLE_ROLE"); // For external data feeds
// Structs for organizing data within the vault
struct UserDeposit {
uint256 amount; // Amount of tokens deposited
uint256 shares; // User's share of the vault's total value
uint256 depositTime; // Timestamp of the deposit
uint256 lockPeriod; // Optional lock period for deposits
bool isActive; // Whether the deposit is currently active
}
struct AIAgent {
address agentAddress; // Off-chain service address of the AI agent
uint256 reputationScore; // Score based on performance and reliability (0-2000 scale)
uint256 stakedTokens; // Amount of tokens staked as collateral by the agent
uint256 successfulTrades; // Counter for successful trades executed by the agent
uint256 totalTrades; // Counter for total trades executed
uint256 totalProfit; // Total profit generated by the agent
uint256 totalLoss; // Total loss incurred by the agent
bool isActive; // Flag indicating if the agent is currently active
string specialization; // e.g., "Momentum", "Sentiment", "Arbitrage"
}
struct Strategy {
bytes32 strategyId; // Unique identifier for the trading strategy
string name; // Human-readable name of the strategy
address strategyContract; // Address of the deployed strategy contract (e.g., for specific trading logic)
uint256 allocatedFunds; // Funds currently allocated to this strategy by the vault
uint256 totalReturns; // Accumulated returns from this strategy
uint256 riskScore; // Calculated risk score for this strategy (e.g., 1-10)
bool isActive; // Whether the strategy is currently active and accepting trades
uint256 createdAt; // Timestamp when the strategy was registered
}
struct TradeExecution {
bytes32 tradeId; // Unique identifier for a specific trade
bytes32 agentId; // ID of the AI agent that initiated the trade
bytes32 strategyId; // ID of the strategy executed
uint256 amount; // Amount of input token for the trade
address tokenIn; // Input token address
address tokenOut; // Output token address
uint256 expectedReturn; // Minimum expected output amount (slippage protection)
uint256 actualReturn; // Actual output amount received
uint256 executionTime; // Timestamp of trade execution
bool isSuccessful; // Boolean indicating if the trade was successful
}
// State variables mapping and storage
mapping(address => UserDeposit[]) public userDeposits; // Stores deposits per user address
mapping(bytes32 => AIAgent) public aiAgents; // Stores AI agent data by agentId
mapping(bytes32 => Strategy) public strategies; // Stores strategy metadata by strategyId
mapping(bytes32 => TradeExecution[]) public agentTrades; // Logs trades executed by each agent
mapping(address => uint256) public tokenBalances; // Vault's balance for each token address
uint256 public totalValueLocked; // Total value of assets managed by the vault
uint256 public totalShares; // Total shares issued to all depositors
uint256 public performanceFee; // Performance fee in basis points (e.g., 1000 = 10%)
uint256 public managementFee; // Management fee in basis points (e.g., 200 = 2%)
uint256 public minimumDeposit; // Minimum amount required for a deposit
uint256 public maxDrawdown; // Maximum allowed drawdown in basis points (e.g., 2000 = 20%)
// Events to log important state changes and actions
event Deposit(address indexed user, uint256 amount, uint256 shares);
event Withdrawal(address indexed user, uint256 amount, uint256 shares);
event AIAgentRegistered(bytes32 indexed agentId, address agentAddress);
event StrategyExecuted(bytes32 indexed strategyId, bytes32 indexed agentId, uint256 profit);
event EmergencyWithdrawal(address indexed user, uint256 amount);
event PerformanceFeeCollected(uint256 amount);
// Modifiers to enforce access control and conditions
modifier onlyActiveAgent(bytes32 agentId) {
require(aiAgents[agentId].isActive, "Agent not active");
// Check reputation score as a prerequisite for execution
require(aiAgents[agentId].reputationScore >= 500, "Agent reputation too low"); // Assuming 0-2000 scale where 500 is 0.5
_;
}
modifier validDeposit(uint256 amount) {
require(amount >= minimumDeposit, "Amount below minimum deposit");
require(amount <= getMaxSingleDeposit(), "Amount exceeds maximum deposit limit");
_;
}
/**
* @dev Initializes the contract after deployment, setting initial parameters.
* This function is called once using the `UUPS` upgrade pattern.
*/
function initialize(
uint256 _performanceFee,
uint256 _managementFee,
uint256 _minimumDeposit
) public initializer {
// Initialize OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts
__ReentrancyGuard_init();
__AccessControl_init();
__Pausable_init();
// Grant default admin and emergency roles to the deployer
_grantRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender);
_grantRole(EMERGENCY_ROLE, msg.sender);
// Set initial fee structure and minimum deposit
performanceFee = _performanceFee;
managementFee = _managementFee;
minimumDeposit = _minimumDeposit;
maxDrawdown = 2000; // Set default max drawdown to 20%
}
/**
* @dev Allows users to deposit assets into the vault, receiving shares in return.
* Uses SafeERC20 for secure token transfers.
*/
function deposit(
address token,
uint256 amount,
uint256 lockPeriod
) external nonReentrant whenNotPaused validDeposit(amount) {
// Validate lock period (e.g., 0 days to 1 year)
require(lockPeriod <= 365 days, "Invalid lock period: must be between 0 and 365 days");
// Transfer tokens from the depositor to the vault contract
IERC20(token).safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount);
// Calculate the number of shares the user receives based on current vault value
uint256 shares = calculateShares(amount);
// Record the new deposit
UserDeposit memory newDeposit = UserDeposit({
amount: amount,
shares: shares,
depositTime: block.timestamp,
lockPeriod: lockPeriod,
isActive: true
});
userDeposits[msg.sender].push(newDeposit);
tokenBalances[token] += amount; // Update vault's balance for this token
totalValueLocked += amount; // Update total value locked in the vault
totalShares += shares; // Update total shares outstanding
emit Deposit(msg.sender, amount, shares);
}
/**
* @dev Registers a new AI agent, requiring them to stake collateral.
* Only agents with the AI_AGENT_ROLE can call this function.
*/
function registerAIAgent(
bytes32 agentId,
address agentAddress,
uint256 stakeAmount,
string memory specialization
) external onlyRole(AI_AGENT_ROLE) {
// Basic validation for agent registration
require(agentAddress != address(0), "Invalid agent address");
require(stakeAmount > 0, "Stake amount must be positive");
require(!aiAgents[agentId].isActive, "Agent already registered");
// Transfer stake tokens from the agent's address to the vault
IERC20(getStakeToken()).safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), stakeAmount);
// Initialize the AI agent's data
AIAgent memory newAgent = AIAgent({
agentAddress: agentAddress,
reputationScore: 1000, // Start with a neutral to high reputation score
stakedTokens: stakeAmount,
successfulTrades: 0,
totalTrades: 0,
totalProfit: 0,
totalLoss: 0,
isActive: true,
specialization: specialization
});
aiAgents[agentId] = newAgent;
emit AIAgentRegistered(agentId, agentAddress);
}
/**
* @dev Allows an AI agent to execute a specific trading strategy.
* This function is the core of the trading logic, called by AI agents.
*/
function executeStrategy(
bytes32 agentId,
bytes32 strategyId,
uint256 amount,
address tokenIn,
address tokenOut,
uint256 minAmountOut,
bytes calldata tradeData // ABI-encoded data for interacting with the strategy contract or DEX
) external onlyRole(AI_AGENT_ROLE) onlyActiveAgent(agentId) nonReentrant {
// Validate strategy and agent status before execution
require(strategies[strategyId].isActive, "Strategy not active");
require(amount <= strategies[strategyId].allocatedFunds, "Insufficient strategy funds allocated");
require(tokenBalances[tokenIn] >= amount, "Insufficient vault balance for tokenIn");
// Generate a unique trade ID for logging purposes
bytes32 tradeId = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(agentId, strategyId, block.timestamp, amount));
// Log the trade initiation
TradeExecution memory trade = TradeExecution({
tradeId: tradeId,
agentId: agentId,
strategyId: strategyId,
amount: amount,
tokenIn: tokenIn,
tokenOut: tokenOut,
expectedReturn: minAmountOut,
actualReturn: 0, // Will be updated upon successful execution
executionTime: block.timestamp,
isSuccessful: false
});
// Attempt to execute the trade via an internal function
try this.executeTradeInternal(
strategyId,
amount,
tokenIn,
tokenOut,
minAmountOut,
tradeData
) returns (uint256 amountOut) {
// Trade execution successful
trade.actualReturn = amountOut;
trade.isSuccessful = true;
// Update token balances within the vault
tokenBalances[tokenIn] -= amount;
tokenBalances[tokenOut] += amountOut;
// Update agent reputation based on trade outcome
// Profit is calculated as amountOut - amount (assuming 1:1 token value for simplicity here)
int256 profit = int256(amountOut) - int256(amount);
updateAgentReputation(agentId, true, profit > 0 ? uint256(profit) : 0);
// Update strategy performance metrics
updateStrategyPerformance(strategyId, profit);
emit StrategyExecuted(strategyId, agentId, profit > 0 ? uint256(profit) : 0);
} catch (bytes memory reason) {
// Trade execution failed
updateAgentReputation(agentId, false, 0); // Penalize agent for failure
// Optionally revert the whole transaction or just log the failure
// Reverting might be necessary if the vault state becomes inconsistent
revert(reason);
}
// Add the trade record to the agent's trade history
agentTrades[agentId].push(trade);
// Increment total trades for the agent
aiAgents[agentId].totalTrades++;
}
/**
* @dev Internal function to handle the actual trade execution logic.
* This function interacts with external strategy contracts or DeFi protocols.
* It's marked `external` to be callable via `call` from `executeStrategy`,
* but should only be invoked internally by the `executeStrategy` function.
*/
function executeTradeInternal(
bytes32 strategyId,
uint256 amount,
address tokenIn,
address tokenOut,
uint256 minAmountOut,
bytes calldata tradeData
) external returns (uint256 amountOut) {
// Ensure this function is only called internally by the vault
require(msg.sender == address(this), "Internal function only");
// Retrieve the strategy contract address
address strategyContract = strategies[strategyId].strategyContract;
require(strategyContract != address(0), "Invalid strategy contract address");
// Execute the trade using the provided tradeData (e.g., a DEX swap call)
// This uses low-level `call` to allow interaction with arbitrary contracts.
(bool success, bytes memory returnData) = strategyContract.call(tradeData);
// Check if the external call was successful
require(success, "Strategy contract execution failed");
// Decode the return value, which is expected to be the amount of output tokens received
amountOut = abi.decode(returnData, (uint256));
// Ensure the received amount meets the minimum required output to prevent slippage issues
require(amountOut >= minAmountOut, "Slippage detected: Insufficient output amount received");
return amountOut;
}
/**
* @dev Updates an AI agent's reputation score and statistics based on trade outcomes.
* This mechanism incentivizes profitable and reliable agents.
*/
function updateAgentReputation(
bytes32 agentId,
bool tradeSuccessful,
uint256 profit
) internal {
AIAgent storage agent = aiAgents[agentId]; // Get a storage pointer to the agent's data
if (tradeSuccessful) {
agent.successfulTrades++;
agent.totalProfit += profit;
// Increase reputation score proportional to profit, with a cap
// Scale factor needs careful tuning based on expected profit ranges
uint256 reputationIncrease = (profit * 10) / 1e18; // Example scaling
agent.reputationScore = min(agent.reputationScore + reputationIncrease, 2000); // Cap reputation at 2000 (max)
} else {
// Apply a penalty for failed trades
uint256 reputationDecrease = 50; // Fixed penalty for failed trades
agent.reputationScore = agent.reputationScore > reputationDecrease
? agent.reputationScore - reputationDecrease
: 0; // Ensure score doesn't go below zero
// Deactivate agent if reputation falls below a critical threshold
if (agent.reputationScore < 200) { // Threshold for deactivation (e.g., 0.2 reputation)
agent.isActive = false;
}
}
}
/**
* @dev Calculates the number of shares a depositor receives for a given amount.
* This ensures fair distribution of vault value.
*/
function calculateShares(uint256 amount) public view returns (uint256) {
// If the vault is empty, the first depositor gets shares equal to the deposit amount.
if (totalShares == 0) {
return amount;
}
// Otherwise, calculate shares proportionally to the current vault value.
return (amount * totalShares) / totalValueLocked;
}
/**
* @dev Calculates the amount of tokens a user can withdraw for a given number of shares.
*/
function calculateWithdrawalAmount(uint256 shares) public view returns (uint256) {
// Prevent division by zero if no shares exist
if (totalShares == 0) {
return 0;
}
// Calculate withdrawal amount proportionally to the vault's total value.
return (shares * totalValueLocked) / totalShares;
}
/**
* @dev Allows emergency withdrawal by admin, pausing operations.
* This function is critical for handling unforeseen circumstances or exploits.
*/
function emergencyWithdraw() external onlyRole(EMERGENCY_ROLE) {
_pause(); // Pause all vault operations
// Implement additional logic here, e.g., notifying users, initiating controlled asset liquidation.
}
/**
* @dev Utility function to find the minimum of two uint256 values.
*/
function min(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
return a < b ? a : b;
}
/**
* @dev Calculates the maximum single deposit allowed, typically a fraction of the total value locked.
* This prevents any single user from dominating the vault's capital.
*/
function getMaxSingleDeposit() public view returns (uint256) {
// Example: Max 10% of TVL in a single deposit to maintain diversification.
return totalValueLocked / 10;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the address of the token used for staking by AI agents.
* This could be the protocol's governance token or a stablecoin.
*/
function getStakeToken() public pure returns (address) {
// Placeholder: In a real implementation, this would return a configured address.
return 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890;
}
/**
* @dev Updates the performance metrics of a specific strategy.
* This helps in tracking the effectiveness of different trading approaches.
*/
function updateStrategyPerformance(bytes32 strategyId, int256 profitOrLoss) internal {
Strategy storage strat = strategies[strategyId];
if (profitOrLoss >= 0) {
strat.totalReturns += uint256(profitOrLoss);
} else {
// Handling losses requires careful consideration.
// We might adjust the strategy's risk score or allocated funds.
// For now, we'll just track the loss implicitly by not increasing totalReturns.
// A more advanced system might have a `totalLoss` field.
}
// Update riskScore based on PnL volatility and other factors.
}
}
Strategy Management System
The strategy management system enables dynamic deployment and management of trading strategies while maintaining security and performance tracking. This includes registering new strategies, allocating capital, and monitoring their effectiveness through on-chain metrics.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/access/AccessControlUpgradeable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/proxy/utils/Initializable.sol";
/**
* @title StrategyRegistry
* @dev Manages the registration, lifecycle, and metadata of AI trading strategies.
*/
contract StrategyRegistry is Initializable, AccessControlUpgradeable {
// Role for entities authorized to register and manage strategies
bytes32 public constant STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE = keccak256("STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE");
// Metadata for each registered strategy
struct StrategyMetadata {
string name; // Human-readable name
string description; // Detailed description of the strategy's logic
address implementation; // Address of the smart contract implementing the strategy logic
uint8 riskLevel; // Risk score from 1 (low) to 10 (high)
uint16 expectedReturnBps; // Expected annual return in basis points (e.g., 1500 for 15%)
uint256 minimumCapital; // Minimum capital required to deploy this strategy
uint256 maximumCapital; // Maximum capital allowed for this strategy
bool isActive; // Whether the strategy is currently active and available for deployment
uint256 createdAt; // Timestamp of strategy registration
uint256 totalDeployedCapital; // Total capital currently allocated across all instances
uint256 successRate; // Tracked success rate (e.g., % of profitable trades)
}
// Mapping to store strategy metadata by a unique strategy ID
mapping(bytes32 => StrategyMetadata) public strategies;
// Mapping to track deployed instances of each strategy (optional, for complex deployments)
mapping(bytes32 => address[]) public strategyInstances;
// Events emitted upon strategy lifecycle changes
event StrategyRegistered(bytes32 indexed strategyId, string name, address implementation);
event StrategyUpdated(bytes32 indexed strategyId);
event StrategyDeployed(bytes32 indexed strategyId, address indexed instance, uint256 capital);
/**
* @dev Initializes the registry contract with access control setup.
*/
function initialize() public initializer {
__AccessControl_init();
// Grant the default admin role to the deployer
_grantRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender);
// Grant the strategy manager role to the deployer as well
_grantRole(STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE, msg.sender);
}
/**
* @dev Registers a new trading strategy with its associated metadata.
* Requires the caller to have the STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE.
*/
function registerStrategy(
bytes32 _strategyId,
string calldata _name,
string calldata _description,
address _implementation,
uint8 _riskLevel,
uint16 _expectedReturnBps,
uint256 _minimumCapital,
uint256 _maximumCapital
) external onlyRole(STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE) {
// Validate inputs
require(_implementation != address(0), "Invalid implementation address");
require(_riskLevel >= 1 && _riskLevel <= 10, "Risk level out of range");
require(_minimumCapital > 0, "Minimum capital must be positive");
require(_maximumCapital >= _minimumCapital, "Maximum capital must be >= minimum");
require(strategies[_strategyId].implementation == address(0), "Strategy ID already exists"); // Prevent re-registration
// Store the strategy metadata
strategies[_strategyId] = StrategyMetadata({
name: _name,
description: _description,
implementation: _implementation,
riskLevel: _riskLevel,
expectedReturnBps: _expectedReturnBps,
minimumCapital: _minimumCapital,
maximumCapital: _maximumCapital,
isActive: true, // Newly registered strategies are active by default
createdAt: block.timestamp,
totalDeployedCapital: 0,
successRate: 0
});
emit StrategyRegistered(_strategyId, _name, _implementation);
}
/**
* @dev Updates metadata for an existing strategy.
* Allows modification of description, risk level, capital limits, and activity status.
*/
function updateStrategy(
bytes32 _strategyId,
string calldata _description,
uint8 _riskLevel,
uint16 _expectedReturnBps,
uint256 _minimumCapital,
uint256 _maximumCapital,
bool _isActive
) external onlyRole(STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE) {
StrategyMetadata storage strat = strategies[_strategyId];
require(strat.implementation != address(0), "Strategy not found");
// Update fields
strat.description = _description;
strat.riskLevel = _riskLevel;
strat.expectedReturnBps = _expectedReturnBps;
strat.minimumCapital = _minimumCapital;
strat.maximumCapital = _maximumCapital;
strat.isActive = _isActive;
emit StrategyUpdated(_strategyId);
}
/**
* @dev Deploys an instance of a registered strategy, allocating capital.
* This function would typically be called by the Delphi Vault contract or an authorized manager.
*/
function deployStrategyInstance(
bytes32 _strategyId,
address _instanceAddress,
uint256 _capital
) external onlyRole(STRATEGY_MANAGER_ROLE) { // Or could be called by the Vault contract itself
StrategyMetadata storage strat = strategies[_strategyId];
require(strat.implementation != address(0), "Strategy not found");
require(strat.isActive, "Strategy is not active");
require(_capital >= strat.minimumCapital, "Capital below minimum requirement");
require(strat.totalDeployedCapital + _capital <= strat.maximumCapital, "Capital exceeds maximum limit");
// Record the deployed instance (optional)
strategyInstances[_strategyId].push(_instanceAddress);
// Update total deployed capital for the strategy
strat.totalDeployedCapital += _capital;
emit StrategyDeployed(_strategyId, _instanceAddress, _capital);
}
/**
* @dev Retrieves metadata for a given strategy ID.
*/
function getStrategy(bytes32 _strategyId) external view returns (StrategyMetadata memory) {
require(strategies[_strategyId].implementation != address(0), "Strategy not found");
return strategies[_strategyId];
}
/**
* @dev Updates the success rate of a strategy based on execution results.
* This function would typically be called internally after trades are finalized.
*/
function updateStrategySuccessRate(bytes32 _strategyId, uint256 _totalTrades, uint256 _successfulTrades) external {
// Only allow updates from trusted sources (e.g., the Vault contract or specific admin roles)
// require(msg.sender == address(VAULT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS), "Unauthorized");
StrategyMetadata storage strat = strategies[_strategyId];
require(strat.implementation != address(0), "Strategy not found");
if (_totalTrades > 0) {
strat.successRate = (_successfulTrades * 10000) / _totalTrades; // Store as percentage (0-10000)
}
}
}
Proof-of-Performance Consensus {#proof-of-performance}
Synergizing AI and Blockchain
The Delphi Ventures protocol introduces a novel Proof-of-Performance (PoP) consensus mechanism that goes beyond traditional Proof-of-Work or Proof-of-Stake. In PoP, the reputation and influence of AI agents within the network are directly tied to their verifiable trading performance. This creates a self-optimizing ecosystem where the most successful and reliable AI agents are rewarded, while underperforming or malicious agents are penalized or removed.
How Proof-of-Performance Works:
- Agent Registration & Staking: AI agents must stake a significant amount of tokens (e.g., DELPHI tokens) to participate. This stake acts as collateral, aligning their incentives with the success of the fund.
- Signal Generation & Execution: Agents generate trading signals. These signals are routed through the integration bridge and executed on-chain via smart contracts. Every trade executed is recorded immutably on the blockchain.
- On-Chain Performance Tracking: The
DelphiVaultsmart contract meticulously tracks the outcome of each trade executed by an agent, including the profit or loss, execution time, and associated strategy. This data is publicly verifiable. - Reputation Scoring: Based on the on-chain performance data, an agent's reputation score is dynamically updated. Factors include:
- Profitability: Higher profits lead to increased reputation.
- Win Rate: A higher percentage of successful trades boosts reputation.
- Risk-Adjusted Returns: Sharpe ratio and other risk-adjusted metrics are factored in.
- Execution Reliability: Penalties are applied for failed trades or significant slippage.
- Strategy Adherence: Deviations from assigned strategies or risk parameters lead to reputation loss.
- Collateral & Penalties: Agents with consistently poor performance or malicious behavior face penalties. Their stake can be slashed, and their reputation score reduced, limiting their ability to execute trades or even leading to their deactivation. Conversely, highly performing agents might earn rewards or reduced fees.
- Agent Selection: Investment decisions can be dynamically weighted based on agent reputation. Strategies or trades proposed by high-reputation agents might receive higher allocation priority or have their signals considered with greater weight.
This PoP mechanism fosters a competitive yet collaborative environment where AI agents are constantly incentivized to improve their strategies and contribute positively to the collective intelligence of the fund. This differs from traditional systems where performance is often opaque and subject to human bias or manipulation.
Real-World Implementation Examples {#implementation-examples}
The principles of Collective Intelligence Trading and AI-driven finance are already showing promise in various forms, though a fully realized decentralized hedge fund like Delphi Ventures is nascent.
1. Algorithmic Trading Firms (Traditional Finance)
Firms like Renaissance Technologies (Medallion Fund), Two Sigma, and DE Shaw have pioneered the use of sophisticated quantitative models and AI for decades. They employ teams of mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists to develop highly complex algorithms that analyze vast datasets to identify and exploit market inefficiencies. While centralized and opaque, their success demonstrates the power of data-driven, systematic investing. Delphi Ventures aims to democratize access to similar intelligence.
2. DeFi Yield Aggregators & Bots
Protocols like Yearn Finance and Harvest Finance utilize smart contracts to automatically compound yields from various DeFi protocols. While primarily focused on yield optimization rather than active trading, they showcase the potential of smart contract automation in finance. More advanced trading bots, often run by individual traders or small groups, leverage APIs to execute strategies like arbitrage or market making on DEXs. Delphi Ventures seeks to integrate these capabilities into a unified, decentralized, and collaboratively intelligent system.
3. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) for Investment
The DAO concept, particularly in the investment space, represents a step towards collective decision-making. Investment DAOs allow members to pool capital and vote on investment proposals. However, these decisions are often slow and subject to human governance limitations. Delphi Ventures enhances this by delegating the granular, high-frequency decision-making to specialized AI agents, with the DAO structure potentially governing overarching fund parameters, risk policies, and AI agent vetting.
4. Crypto Trading Bots & Signal Providers
Numerous services offer crypto trading bots and signal providers. Many of these operate on centralized platforms or rely on single-point-of-failure infrastructure. Delphi Ventures differentiates itself by:
- Decentralization: All operations are on-chain, reducing counterparty risk.
- Collective Intelligence: Multiple AI agents collaborate and compete, leading to more robust strategies than single bots.
- Transparency: All trading activity and agent performance are publicly verifiable on the blockchain.
- Proof-of-Performance: Reputation is earned through demonstrable success, not just marketing.
Example Scenario: Imagine a specific market event, such as a major regulatory announcement impacting a particular altcoin.
- The Sentiment Sage detects a surge of negative sentiment and news coverage, flagging potential downside.
- The Momentum Hunter observes a breakdown in the coin's price trend and increasing selling volume.
- The Risk Guardian notes increased volatility and potential for a sharp drawdown, advising to reduce exposure or hedge.
- The Arbitrage Scout might find short-term opportunities to short the coin on one exchange while covering on another.
These agents would submit their analysis and proposed actions. The system, perhaps through a meta-governance agent or weighted decision-making based on agent reputation, would then decide on the optimal course of action – likely a combination of reducing exposure, hedging, or even shorting, executed via smart contracts.
Integration with DeFi Protocols {#defi-integration}
The power of Delphi Ventures is amplified through its deep integration with the existing DeFi ecosystem. This allows the AI agents to leverage a vast array of financial primitives and opportunities directly on-chain.
Key Integration Points:
-
Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs):
- Swaps: AI agents interact with DEXs like Uniswap V3, Curve, Balancer, and PancakeSwap to execute trades based on their strategies. They can leverage liquidity pools for token swaps, utilizing smart contract calls to perform these actions efficiently.
- Liquidity Provision: Strategies might involve providing liquidity to specific pools to earn trading fees and potentially LP tokens, which the Yield Optimizer agent can then further farm.
-
Lending Protocols:
- Borrowing for Leverage: Agents can utilize protocols like Aave or Compound to borrow assets, enabling leveraged trading strategies. This requires careful risk management by the Risk Guardian due to liquidation risks.
- Flash Loans: The Arbitrage Scout heavily relies on flash loans from protocols like Aave or dYdX to execute complex arbitrage strategies without upfront capital, provided the opportunity is profitable enough to cover loan fees and gas costs.
-
Yield Farming & Aggregators:
- Staking: Agents can stake assets in various DeFi protocols to earn yield.
- Liquidity Mining: They can provide liquidity to incentivize new protocols, earning governance tokens or fees. The Yield Optimizer agent is specifically designed to manage these complex, multi-protocol strategies.
-
Synthetic Assets & Derivatives:
- Protocols like Synthetix or Ribbon Finance offer synthetic assets and structured products. AI agents can interact with these to implement more complex strategies, such as delta-neutral farming, options strategies, or synthetic asset arbitrage.
-
Oracles:
- Reliable price feeds are crucial. Delphi Ventures integrates with decentralized oracle networks like Chainlink to obtain accurate, tamper-proof price data for asset valuation, trade execution, and risk assessment. This ensures that AI decisions are based on credible market information.
Example of Integration:
The Arbitrage Scout, identifying a price discrepancy for WETH/USDC on Uniswap V3 versus Binance, would:
- Access Chainlink price feeds to confirm the discrepancy reliably.
- Calculate the necessary gas costs for executing trades on both Uniswap V3 and potentially Binance (via an off-chain relay).
- Utilize the DelphiVault smart contract to approve token transfers.
- Call the Uniswap V3 Router smart contract to swap USDC for WETH.
- Transfer the WETH to Binance (if cross-exchange) and execute a sell order via a regulated API, relaying the outcome back to the DelphiVault. All steps would be logged on-chain for transparency.
Neural Decision Visualization {#decision-visualization}
Demystifying AI Trading
One of the primary challenges in AI-driven finance is the "black box" problem, where the decision-making process of complex models can be difficult to understand. Delphi Ventures addresses this through Neural Decision Visualization, providing users with intuitive insights into why the AI agents are making specific trading decisions.
Key Features:
- Signal Confidence & Rationale: Each trading signal generated by an AI agent is accompanied by a confidence score and a textual rationale. For example, the Momentum Hunter might explain a buy signal with: "Bullish MACD crossover on 4-hour chart, RSI rising above 50, accompanied by increasing volume. Confidence: 85%."
- Indicator Weighting: The system visualizes which technical indicators, sentiment scores, or risk parameters most heavily influenced a particular trade decision. This might be displayed as a bar chart showing the contribution of each factor.
- Sentiment Heatmaps: For the Sentiment Sage, visualizations could include heatmaps showing sentiment distribution across different news sources or social media platforms, highlighting key articles or posts that swayed the decision.
- Risk Exposure Breakdown: The Risk Guardian's analysis can be visualized through charts showing portfolio volatility, concentration risk across different assets, and the impact of potential market shocks (e.g., stress test scenarios).
- Pattern Recognition Overlays: For strategies involving chart pattern analysis, the system could overlay detected patterns (like triangles or flags) directly onto historical price charts, highlighting the formation that triggered a trade.
- Agent Performance Dashboards: A comprehensive dashboard displays the performance metrics (win rate, PnL, reputation score) of all active AI agents, allowing users to see which agents are contributing most effectively.
Example Visualization:
Imagine a user viewing a recent trade executed by the Momentum Hunter:
- Trade Summary: Buy ETH/USDC, Amount: $10,000, Profit: +$150
- Agent: Momentum Hunter (Reputation: 1800/2000)
- Decision Breakdown:
- MACD Crossover: +40% Influence
- RSI (75): +25% Influence
- Volume Spike: +20% Influence
- Ascending Triangle Pattern: +15% Influence
- Visual Chart: A price chart showing ETH/USDC, with the MACD indicator below. The chart highlights the MACD crossover point and the RSI level, with the detected ascending triangle pattern clearly outlined.
This transparency builds trust and allows users to understand the underlying logic driving the fund's actions, moving beyond the opaque nature of traditional hedge funds.
Cross-Chain Intelligence Hub {#cross-chain}
The future of DeFi is inherently multi-chain. To maximize opportunities and manage risk effectively, Delphi Ventures operates a Cross-Chain Intelligence Hub. This hub aggregates data and coordinates actions across different blockchain networks, enabling sophisticated strategies that span the entire Web3 landscape.
Capabilities:
- Multi-Chain Data Aggregation: The hub connects to various blockchains (e.g., Ethereum, Polygon, Binance Smart Chain, Solana, Avalanche) to gather real-time price data, transaction volumes, smart contract states, and liquidity information.
- Cross-Chain Arbitrage Execution: The Arbitrage Scout leverages the hub to identify and execute arbitrage opportunities that exist between assets or liquidity pools residing on different chains. This involves complex routing logic and cross-chain bridging solutions.
- Interoperable Strategies: Strategies can be designed to move assets or liquidity between chains to optimize yield or capitalize on network-specific opportunities. For instance, the Yield Optimizer might shift assets from a lower-yielding pool on Ethereum to a higher-yielding one on Polygon, utilizing efficient bridging protocols.
- Bridged Asset Management: The system monitors and manages assets that have been bridged across chains, accounting for potential risks associated with bridging technology (e.g., smart contract vulnerabilities, slashing risks in PoS networks).
- Cross-Chain Oracle Integration: Oracle data relevant to cross-chain operations (e.g., bridge security status, inter-chain asset prices) is ingested and utilized by the AI agents.
- Security Monitoring: The hub includes security monitoring for various blockchains and bridging protocols, alerting the Risk Guardian to potential systemic risks.
Technical Implementation (Conceptual):
The hub would likely employ a network of decentralized nodes or oracles responsible for monitoring different chains. Communication between chains could utilize:
- Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) Protocol: For chains utilizing Cosmos SDK.
- LayerZero, Wormhole, or similar omnichain interoperability protocols: For seamless messaging and asset transfers across EVM and non-EVM chains.
- Dedicated Bridge Contracts: Custom contracts audited for security, facilitating asset transfers.
The AI agents within Delphi Ventures would interact with these cross-chain communication protocols through APIs exposed by the hub, allowing them to seamlessly incorporate multi-chain data and execute cross-chain actions.
Risk Management and Security {#risk-management}
Robust risk management and uncompromising security are paramount for a decentralized hedge fund managing user capital. Delphi Ventures integrates these principles at every layer of its architecture.
Core Risk Management Strategies:
- Smart Contract Audits: All smart contracts, including the
DelphiVault,StrategyRegistry, and any custom strategy implementations, undergo rigorous security audits by multiple reputable third-party firms. Penetration testing and formal verification methods are employed to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities. - AI Agent Reputation & Staking: The Proof-of-Performance consensus inherently embeds risk management. Agents stake collateral, incentivizing honest behavior. Poor performance leads to reputation loss and potential slashing of their stake, acting as a direct deterrent against risky or malicious strategies.
- Diversified AI Agent Pool: Relying on a single AI agent or strategy type is inherently risky. Delphi Ventures employs a diverse ecosystem of specialized agents (Momentum, Sentiment, Risk, Arbitrage, Yield) whose strategies may be uncorrelated, providing diversification benefits.
- Dynamic Position Sizing: The Risk Guardian agent dynamically adjusts trade sizes based on real-time volatility, market conditions, and the specific risk profile of each trade signal. This prevents over-exposure and manages drawdowns effectively.
- Portfolio Diversification: The system aims to maintain a diversified portfolio across different asset classes and strategies, reducing concentration risk. The Risk Guardian monitors asset correlations and concentration levels.
- Drawdown Controls: The
DelphiVaultcontract includes parameters likemaxDrawdown, which can trigger automated risk-off protocols or pause trading if the fund experiences significant losses. - Circuit Breakers & Pausing Mechanisms: The
PausableUpgradeablefunctionality in the smart contracts allows for immediate halting of all trading activities in case of emergencies, exploits, or unforeseen market events. Access to this is strictly controlled by designated roles (EMERGENCY_ROLE). - Fail-Safes & Emergency Protocols: The Risk Guardian constantly monitors for black swan events or extreme market volatility. It can recommend or automatically trigger hedging strategies, portfolio rebalancing, or liquidity shifts to protect capital.
- Oracle Security: Reliance on secure, decentralized oracles (like Chainlink) ensures that AI agents receive reliable market data, preventing manipulation through faulty price feeds.
- Formal Verification: Employing formal verification techniques on critical smart contract functions can mathematically prove the absence of certain classes of bugs, enhancing security assurance.
Security Measures:
- Access Control: Granular role-based access control (RBAC) implemented using OpenZeppelin's
AccessControlcontract ensures that only authorized entities (e.g., AI agents with specific roles, admin roles) can perform critical actions. - Reentrancy Guards: Protection against reentrancy attacks is built into core functions using
ReentrancyGuard. - Input Validation: All external inputs and function arguments are thoroughly validated to prevent unexpected behavior or exploits.
- Secure Key Management: Off-chain components, including AI agent services and the integration bridge, employ best practices for secure private key management (e.g., HSMs, encrypted key storage).
- Monitoring & Alerting: Continuous monitoring of on-chain activity, AI agent behavior, and system health, with automated alerts for suspicious activities.
By integrating these multi-layered security and risk management practices, Delphi Ventures aims to provide a secure and trustworthy platform for AI-powered decentralized finance.
Future Implications and Roadmap {#future-implications}
The successful implementation of Delphi Ventures and Collective Intelligence Trading will usher in a new paradigm for investment management, democratizing access to sophisticated strategies and fundamentally altering the financial landscape.
Transformative Implications:
- Democratization of Alpha: Retail investors gain access to institutional-grade AI trading strategies, leveling the playing field and potentially unlocking higher returns for a broader audience.
- Enhanced Market Efficiency: The collective intelligence of diverse AI agents, constantly competing and collaborating, can lead to more efficient price discovery and reduced market volatility.
- Automated & Adaptive Strategies: Investment strategies become truly autonomous, capable of adapting to evolving market conditions in real-time without human intervention, overcoming the limitations of static algorithms.
- Trust & Transparency: The combination of blockchain's immutability and AI's data-driven decisions fosters unprecedented transparency and trust in financial management.
- New Financial Products: The infrastructure could support the creation of novel investment products managed by AI, tailored to specific risk appetites or market views.
- Evolution of DAO Governance: Investment DAOs can evolve to incorporate AI-driven decision-making frameworks, balancing human oversight with algorithmic efficiency.
Roadmap & Future Development:
-
Phase 1: Core Protocol Development (Completed/Ongoing):
- Development and auditing of the
DelphiVaultandStrategyRegistrysmart contracts. - Establishment of the initial AI agent framework (Momentum Hunter, Sentiment Sage).
- Building the Data Intelligence Hub and Integration Bridge infrastructure.
- Setting up initial Cross-Chain capabilities.
- Development and auditing of the
-
Phase 2: Agent Ecosystem Expansion & Testing (Next 6-12 Months):
- Onboarding and rigorous testing of additional AI agents (Risk Guardian, Arbitrage Scout, Yield Optimizer).
- Refinement of the Proof-of-Performance consensus mechanism and agent reputation scoring.
- Integration with a wider array of DeFi protocols and blockchains.
- Deployment of Neural Decision Visualization tools for early users.
- Initial closed beta testing with select users and AI agents.
-
Phase 3: Public Launch & Community Growth (12-18 Months):
- Public deployment of the Delphi Ventures protocol.
- Launch of the DELPHI governance token to facilitate decentralized governance.
- Open onboarding for third-party AI developers to create and deploy their agents.
- Continuous improvement of AI models, risk management protocols, and cross-chain capabilities based on community feedback and real-world performance.
- Establishment of robust security monitoring and incident response protocols.
-
Phase 4: Advanced Features & Ecosystem Integration (18+ Months):
- Development of advanced AI capabilities like meta-learning (AI learning how to learn) and self-evolving strategies.
- Integration with traditional financial markets via regulated bridges.
- Expansion into new asset classes managed by AI, such as real estate tokenization or venture capital.
- Fostering a vibrant ecosystem of AI developers, liquidity providers, and users contributing to the collective intelligence.
The journey towards AI-powered decentralized hedge funds is complex, demanding innovation across AI, blockchain, and financial engineering. Delphi Ventures is committed to building this future, creating a more intelligent, transparent, and accessible financial system for everyone. We invite developers, investors, and enthusiasts to join us in revolutionizing finance, one intelligent trade at a time.
Top comments (0)