Interviewer: “How are you going to handle cross-browser compatibility in this project?”
This is one of those classic interview questions where most developers tend to give fairly predictable answers.
Most answers sound like this:
“I’ll test the application across different browsers.”
“I’ll add vendor prefixes where necessary.”
“I’ll use a reset stylesheet like Normalize.css to make sure things look the same everywhere.”
“If issues come up, I’ll debug them browser by browser.”
These are valid points, but they lean heavily on manual effort and can sometimes sound too generic.
My answer, given that Tailwind CSS is required for the project:
Dev: Since we’re using Tailwind CSS, cross-browser compatibility is largely taken care of by the framework itself. Here’s why:
Preflight (Tailwind’s reset layer):
Tailwind includes Preflight, a modified version of Normalize.css. This strips away inconsistent browser defaults for typography, buttons, forms, and layout elements. As a result, the baseline styling is predictable across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Autoprefixer (via PostCSS):
Tailwind automatically runs your styles through Autoprefixer. That means utilities like flex, grid, backdrop-filter, line-clamp, or even modern pseudo-classes like focus-visible are compiled with the correct vendor prefixes. No manual intervention required.
Standards-First Utilities:
Tailwind is built around modern CSS specifications (Flexbox, Grid, Transforms, Filters, etc.). Instead of patching browser-specific quirks, I work directly with utilities that are already standardized across major browsers. This minimizes compatibility headaches.
Future-Friendly:
Because Tailwind tracks CSS spec evolution and browser adoption, the utilities are continuously updated. As browsers evolve, Tailwind evolves — which means long-term cross-browser support is baked into the ecosystem.
Verification Step (Best Practice):
Even though Tailwind handles most of the heavy lifting, I’d still run tests on BrowserStack or real devices to catch edge cases. But the difference is that I’m not starting from scratch — I’m building on top of a framework that already prioritizes compatibility.
Why this answer stands out in an interview
Instead of saying “I’ll test and fix issues as they come”, I tie my solution directly to the tooling required in the project (Tailwind CSS). This shows I understand how Tailwind doesn’t just speed up styling, but also solves deeper engineering challenges like cross-browser compatibility out of the box.
In other words, I’m not just giving a generic answer — I’m giving a framework-aware answer.
Top comments (0)