DEV Community

BeyondIT
BeyondIT

Posted on

I Watched a Developer Get a $104K Bill for a Static Site (Here's What I Learned)

Last month, while scrolling Reddit at 2 AM (debugging my own deploy issues, naturally), I came across a post that made me close my laptop and just... sit there.

A developer deployed a simple Next.js static site to Netlify on Friday evening. By Monday morning: $104,500.69 bill.

Actually, let me rephrase that—it wasn't Monday morning. The bill arrived 72 hours after the bot attack started. No warnings. No kill switch. No spending cap.

The developer's total annual revenue? $3,400.

This single weekend bill exceeded that by 3,000%.

Read the full guide: 5 Cloud Disasters That Cost Real Money – And How to Stop Bleeding

The Part Nobody Talks About

Here's what keeps me up at night: This wasn't an amateur mistake. The developer knew what they were doing. They deployed correctly. Followed best practices. Did everything the documentation recommended.

And still got bankrupted by a DDoS attack they never saw coming.

The same week, I read about an AWS Lambda recursion bug that cost another startup $75,000 in 48 hours. S3 logs triggered the Lambda. Lambda created more logs. Exponential loop. By the time the engineer woke up Saturday morning, the bill was already at $37K.

I mean, think about that. You go to sleep with a working app and wake up to financial ruin.

The Two Fixes That Would've Prevented $179K in Losses

After analyzing these incidents (and I spent way too many late nights on this, coffee getting cold on my desk), I found two configurations that would've stopped both disasters:

Fix #1: Lambda Concurrency Limits (5 Minutes to Implement)

# Set hard limit on Lambda concurrency
aws lambda put-function-concurrency \
  --function-name your-function \
  --reserved-concurrent-executions 10 \
  --region us-east-1

# Verify it worked
aws lambda get-function-concurrency \
  --function-name your-function \
  --region us-east-1
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

That's it. Even if recursion happens, can't exceed 10 instances. Bill caps at ~$2/day instead of $75K.

Why AWS doesn't set this by default? Because unlimited concurrency sounds better in marketing materials than "we'll automatically protect your wallet."

Fix #2: Cloudflare + VPS Architecture ($5/month, Unlimited Protection)

Here's the cost breakdown that nobody shows you:

Traffic Scenario Netlify Cost Cloudflare + VPS You Save
Normal (10GB/mo) $0 $5 -$5
Viral (500GB/mo) $220 $5 $215
DDoS (190TB) $104,500 $5 $103,995

VPS physically can't serve more traffic than its capacity. Server maxes out → slows down → bill stays $5. It's impossible to get a surprise bill.

(Sure, your site might be slow during an attack, but you know what's slower? Explaining a six-figure bill to your investors. That's a rhetorical question—I'll leave it hanging there...)

What I'm Not Showing You Here

This post covers 2 of the 15 disasters I documented. The other 13 are... honestly worse:

  • Disaster #3: How Google's "helpful default" deleted a $125B pension fund—both primary AND backup regions
  • Disaster #4: The single Rust .unwrap() that crashed global internet for 6 hours
  • Disaster #5: Kubernetes StatefulSet docs that guarantee 50 minutes of database downtime
  • Disasters #6-15: Azure, GCP, and multi-cloud failures with complete prevention architectures

I also documented the exact code implementations—not just the concepts. The Lambda recursion detection wrapper that survived production for 18 months. The Nginx config that blocked 99.7% of bot traffic. The emergency kill switch that stopped a runaway bill in 60 seconds.

The Complete Prevention Guide (Where the Real Fixes Live)

Look, I could paste all 15 disasters and their fixes here, but Dev.to would hate me for the scroll length, and honestly, you'd probably just skim it anyway.

Instead, I've written the full architectural breakdown with all 15 disasters, complete code samples, and cost comparisons across AWS/Azure/GCP on my blog:

Read the full guide: 5 Cloud Disasters That Cost Real Money – And How to Stop Bleeding

The complete guide includes:

  • Emergency kill switch scripts (test them BEFORE you need them—like, right now)
  • Multi-cloud backup architecture that saved the companies who survived Google's deletion
  • Circuit breaker patterns for production configs (because Rust memory safety doesn't prevent logic panics)
  • S3 Object Lock for immutable backups (testing restores at 3 AM isn't fun, but it's better than discovering your backups are corrupt during an actual disaster)
  • Complete serverless.yml configs with built-in concurrency limits and event filters
  • Cloudflare Worker DDoS protection with rate limiting and bot detection
  • The 13 other disasters I haven't mentioned yet (spoiler: some are worse than $104K)

Everything's production-tested. I've been running variations of these architectures for the last two years across multiple client projects—which is like saying I've made enough mistakes to know what actually breaks in production.

Your Assignment (Seriously, Do This Before Monday)

Run this command right now:

aws lambda list-functions \
  --query 'Functions[?ReservedConcurrentExecutions==`null`].FunctionName'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If you see function names in the output, they have unlimited concurrency. Which means you're one S3 misconfiguration away from a $75K weekend.

The production-grade implementation with recursion detection, rollback logic, and monitoring is in the full article. The basic version takes 5 minutes. The enterprise version with all the safety checks takes maybe 30 minutes.

Both are infinitely better than unlimited.

When These Fixes Don't Apply (Actually, Let Me Be Honest)

Don't use Lambda concurrency limits if you're running high-frequency trading systems where throttling = lost revenue. In that case, set the limit to 100× your normal peak and add billing alerts at $500.

Don't use Cloudflare + VPS if you need <50ms global latency everywhere. Vercel Edge legitimately wins that race. Just... add Cloudflare in front and set bandwidth alerts before you deploy.

Discussion Question

What's the highest unexpected cloud bill you've ever received?

Mine was $847 for a forgotten NAT Gateway running for 3 months. I felt sick for a week. But after researching these disasters, I realized I got lucky—the difference between $847 and $104,500 was pure chance, not skill.

Drop your horror stories in the comments. Sometimes knowing we're not alone in this mess actually helps. And maybe someone reading this will learn from our collective expensive mistakes before they become their own expensive mistakes.


Coming Next Week: "The $125B Delete: Why Your Backups Are Probably Broken"

(Spoiler: If you've never tested a restore, you don't have backups—you have wishful thinking and a false sense of security.)

Follow me for weekly cloud cost survival tactics that actually work for bootstrapped developers and small teams. The kind of stuff we should've learned before production, but instead learned at 3 AM during an outage.


Found this useful? The full 15-disaster breakdown is live on Beyond IT: beyondit.blog/blogs/5-cloud-disasters-that-cost-real-money-and-how-to-stop-bleeding

Top comments (0)