The LLM landscape in late 2025 is a dynamic ecosystem, far removed from the nascent days of early generative AI. We're seeing a relentless push towards greater autonomy, deeper contextual understanding, and increasingly sophisticated multimodal capabilities. As developers, we're no longer just chaining API calls; we're architecting intricate systems that leverage advanced tool use, manage gargantuan context windows, and orchestrate complex agentic workflows. Having just put the latest iterations of OpenAI's GPT-series and Anthropic's Claude through their paces, let me walk you through the practicalities, the new primitives, and the lingering rough edges.
The Evolving Landscape of Context Management: Beyond Simple Tokens
The ability for an LLM to maintain coherent, relevant context across extended interactions has been a perennial challenge. In late 2025, both OpenAI and Anthropic have made significant strides, moving beyond merely increasing token limits to implementing more intelligent context management strategies.
For OpenAI, the shift from the original Assistants API to the newer Responses API (released March 11, 2025) marks a strategic move towards a more robust agent platform. While the Assistants API v1 was deprecated in late 2024 and v2 is currently supported, the Responses API is the future, designed from the ground up to handle conversation history and context more efficiently. It promises to abstract away much of the manual state management developers previously had to implement. Under the hood, this often involves techniques like sliding window attention, where the model focuses on a recent segment of the conversation while intelligently summarizing or discarding less relevant older information. This is crucial because, despite massive increases, context windows are not infinite, and quadratic computational costs still apply to traditional attention mechanisms. Models like GPT-4.1, which excels at coding tasks, demonstrate improved context retention over long codebases.
Anthropic's Claude, particularly the Opus series, has consistently pushed the boundaries of raw context window size. The Claude Opus 4.1, released in August 2025, boasts a 200,000-token context window, making it adept at digesting entire books or extensive codebases. Furthermore, the public beta of Claude Sonnet 4 now supports a staggering one-million-token context, enabling unprecedented analytical depth for large-scale document analysis or multi-hour refactoring sessions. This is a game-changer for tasks requiring deep comprehension across vast amounts of unstructured data. To further assist developers, Anthropic's SDK includes a compaction_control helper. This feature automatically manages token-intensive conversations by summarizing and clearing context when predefined thresholds are reached, eliminating the need for custom compaction logic.
Here's exactly how to leverage Claude's compaction_control in Python, a practical tool for managing token costs in long-running dialogues:
import anthropic
import os
# Ensure your ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is set as an environment variable
# os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"] = "YOUR_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
# Configure compaction_control
# This will summarize the conversation history when it exceeds 5000 tokens,
# using Claude Sonnet 4.5 (or another suitable summarization model)
# and a custom prompt for summarization.
compaction_settings = {
"token_threshold": 5000,
"summarization_model": "claude-sonnet-4.5-20251130", #
"summarization_prompt": "Summarize the preceding conversation for Claude, focusing on key facts and the user's ultimate goal to help it continue accurately."
}
def chat_with_claude_with_compaction(user_message: str, history: list):
# Append the new user message to the history
history.append({"role": "user", "content": user_message})
try:
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4.1-20250805", #
max_tokens=1024,
messages=history,
compaction_control=compaction_settings #
)
assistant_response = response.content[0].text
history.append({"role": "assistant", "content": assistant_response})
return assistant_response
except Exception as e:
print(f"An error occurred: {e}")
return "Sorry, I encountered an error."
# Example usage
conversation_history = []
print("User: Hello, I need help planning a complex project.")
response = chat_with_claude_with_compaction("Hello, I need help planning a complex project. It involves multiple stakeholders and strict deadlines.", conversation_history)
print(f"Claude: {response}")
print("\nUser: The project scope has expanded significantly. We now need to integrate three new modules.")
response = chat_with_claude_with_compaction("The project scope has expanded significantly. We now need to integrate three new modules. How does this impact our timeline?", conversation_history)
print(f"Claude: {response}")
While impressive, it's important to note that even with massive context windows, effectively prompting for optimal retrieval and synthesis within that window remains a skill. Developers still need to employ careful prompt engineering to guide the model's attention, especially in scenarios where "needle in a haystack" retrieval is critical.
Precision Tool Use and Function Calling: Orchestrating Complex Workflows
The ability for LLMs to interact with external systems – databases, APIs, code interpreters – has transformed them into powerful agents. Both OpenAI and Anthropic have refined their tool-use capabilities, moving towards more autonomous and efficient orchestration.
Anthropic's recent enhancements to its Claude Developer Platform, introduced in November 2025, are particularly noteworthy for their focus on agentic efficiency. They introduced three key features:
Advanced Agentic Features
- Programmatic Tool Calling: Claude can now generate and execute code that invokes multiple tools directly within a managed execution environment. This dramatically reduces latency and token consumption by eliminating round-trips through the model for each tool call and subsequent result processing.
- Tool Search Tool: This addresses the challenge of managing vast numbers of tools. Instead of loading all tool definitions upfront, Claude can dynamically discover and load only the tools it needs via a new search capability.
- Tool Use Examples: Developers can now add concrete usage patterns directly into tool definitions. These examples, formatted exactly as real LLM output, improve Claude's tool use performance by demonstrating when and how to use a tool.
OpenAI's approach, particularly with the new Responses API, also emphasizes robust tool integration. While the Assistants API v2 already provided improved function calling and access to OpenAI-hosted tools like Code Interpreter and File Search, the Responses API is designed to integrate these even more seamlessly. It continues to allow developers to define custom tools using JSON schemas, which the model can then call.
Let’s look at a conceptual Python example demonstrating Claude’s programmatic tool calling, showcasing how it can orchestrate multiple operations through a single code block:
import anthropic
import json
import os
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
def get_user_profile(user_id: str):
if user_id == "user123":
return {"id": "user123", "name": "Alice Smith", "email": "alice@example.com", "plan": "premium"}
return {"error": "User not found"}
def update_user_subscription(user_id: str, new_plan: str):
if user_id == "user123":
return {"status": "success", "user_id": user_id, "old_plan": "premium", "new_plan": new_plan}
return {"error": "User not found"}
tools = [
{
"name": "get_user_profile",
"description": "Retrieves the profile information for a given user ID.",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"user_id": {"type": "string", "description": "The ID of the user."}
},
"required": ["user_id"]
}
},
{
"name": "update_user_subscription",
"description": "Updates the subscription plan for a user.",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"user_id": {"type": "string", "description": "The ID of the user."},
"new_plan": {"type": "string", "description": "The new subscription plan."}
},
"required": ["user_id", "new_plan"]
}
}
]
def chat_with_claude_tools(user_message: str, history: list):
history.append({"role": "user", "content": user_message})
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4.1-20250805",
max_tokens=2048,
messages=history,
tools=tools
)
# Logic to handle tool_code or tool_use stop reasons would follow here
return response.content[0].text
This programmatic approach signifies a move towards more robust, less error-prone agentic behavior, where the LLM's reasoning is expressed in code rather than just natural language prompts for tool invocation.
Multimodality Matures: From Pixels to Practicality
Multimodal capabilities, once a futuristic vision, are now a sturdy component of leading LLMs. In 2025, we're seeing these capabilities move beyond impressive demos to practical, API-driven applications.
OpenAI's GPT-4o ("Omni"), released in May 2024, was a landmark in unifying text, audio, and image modalities into a single neural network. While GPT-4o's API access is scheduled to be terminated in February 2026, making way for the more powerful GPT-5.1 series and specialized models like o3 and o4-mini (released April 2025), the underlying multimodal architecture persists and improves. These models can accept image inputs and respond with text and images. The "multi-modal chain of thought" approach means they can reason about problems across different modalities before formulating a solution.
Anthropic's Claude also offers vision capabilities, allowing for image analysis and understanding, particularly with the Opus and Sonnet models. This is particularly useful for tasks like document analysis, diagram interpretation, or visual content moderation.
import openai
import base64
import requests
import os
def encode_image(image_path):
with open(image_path, "rb") as image_file:
return base64.b64encode(image_file.read()).decode("utf-8")
def analyze_image_with_openai_multimodal(image_path: str, prompt: str):
base64_image = encode_image(image_path)
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ.get('OPENAI_API_KEY')}"
}
payload = {
"model": "gpt-5.1-latest-20251115",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": prompt},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": f"data:image/jpeg;base64,{base64_image}"}}
]
}
],
"max_tokens": 500
}
response = requests.post("https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions", headers=headers, json=payload)
return response.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
While impressive, multimodal models still present challenges. Fine-grained object recognition or complex spatial reasoning can be less robust than dedicated computer vision models. Moreover, the interpretation of ambiguous visual cues or highly domain-specific imagery can still lead to "hallucinations."
The Rise of Agentic Architectures: Beyond Single-Turn Interactions
The shift from simple prompt-response cycles to complex, autonomous agentic workflows is a defining trend of late 2025. Developers are now building multi-step systems where LLMs act as intelligent orchestrators, reasoning over tasks, selecting tools, executing actions, and refining their approach based on feedback. While frameworks like AI Agents 2025: Why AutoGPT and CrewAI Still Struggle with Autonomy highlight the current limitations of self-directed systems, the new native platforms from OpenAI and Anthropic aim to bridge that gap.
OpenAI's new Agents platform, built upon the Responses API, is at the forefront of this movement. It introduces concepts like persistent threads for conversational memory and access to OpenAI-hosted tools such as Web Search, File Search, and Computer Use. The Agents SDK with Tracing provides crucial observability into these complex workflows, allowing developers to debug and understand the agent's decision-making process.
Anthropic is also heavily invested in agentic capabilities, particularly for enterprise use cases. Their Claude Code and Claude Artifacts are specialized agents, with Claude Code being specifically designed for programming assistance, now bundled into Team and Enterprise subscriptions. The introduction of a Compliance API allows IT and security leaders to programmatically access usage and content metrics, crucial for governing AI-assisted coding across large teams.
Beyond direct API offerings, a robust ecosystem of agentic AI frameworks has matured significantly. LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen (Microsoft), Phidata, LlamaIndex, and LangGraph (part of LangChain) are widely adopted. These frameworks provide the architectural scaffolding for building sophisticated agents, abstracting away much of the complexity of state management and tool orchestration.
Sources
🛠️ Related Tools
Explore these DataFormatHub tools related to this topic:
- JSON Formatter - Format and beautify JSON for API responses
- Base64 Encoder - Encode data for API payloads
📚 You Might Also Like
- AI Agents 2025: Why AutoGPT and CrewAI Still Struggle with Autonomy
- Neon Postgres 2025: Why the New Serverless Features Change Everything
- Pandas vs Polars: Why the 2025 Evolution Changes Everything
This article was originally published on DataFormatHub, your go-to resource for data format and developer tools insights.
Top comments (0)