AI assistants are increasingly embedded in daily workflows:
coding, writing, reasoning, decision support.
They clearly reduce immediate effort.
But a deeper question remains:
Do they actually reduce cognitive load,
or do they defer it — creating cognitive debt over time?
Recently, Hacker News has seen multiple discussions touching this issue
(e.g. “Your brain on ChatGPT”, governance frameworks, autonomy concerns).
What’s often missing is a non-narrative, formal perspective.
I’ve published a formal, non-adaptive framework on OSF
focused on decision-making, invariants, and cognitive autonomy:
This is not an opinion piece.
Not pro-AI, not anti-AI.
It’s a structural attempt to reason about cognition under assistance.
I’m especially interested in concrete feedback from people who use AI daily:
- Have you noticed changes when the tool is absent?
- Does AI reduce effort sustainably, or postpone it?
- What practices help preserve autonomy?
Curious to hear real observations, not hype.
Top comments (0)