If you’ve been in dev long enough, you’ve probably heard some version of: “Directories are dead for SEO.”
They’re not dead. The bad directory strategy is dead.
Mass-submitting the same listing to 200 random sites is basically the backlink equivalent of eval()—it might “work” in some weird edge case, but it’s risky, messy, and you’ll regret it later.
A better approach is to treat directories like credibility placements:
- They’re a trust layer for humans (your customers)
- They’re a consistency layer for search engines (your business info)
- They’re a discovery layer for niche audiences (especially B2B and services)
This post is a practical, developer-friendly workflow you can run in a weekend, and then maintain in minutes.
And if you want a curated starting point to explore directory options across niches, Directories.Best is built specifically for that.
Why developers should care about directories
Developers often end up owning or influencing “web presence” more than they want to:
- you build a SaaS, now you need distribution
- you freelance, now you need leads
- you run an agency, now you need proof
- you ship something open-source, now you need visibility
Directories can help when they’re relevant and credible—not just because of “SEO,” but because people actually browse them when comparing providers and tools.
Think of directories as the “App Store / Marketplace effect,” but for a niche: people go there with intent, shortlist options, and click out.
What makes a directory worth listing in?
Here’s the filter I use. A directory is usually worth your time if it has at least 2–3 of these:
1) It’s niche or audience-specific
Generic directories are hit-or-miss. Niche directories tend to convert better because visitors already care about the category.
2) It looks maintained
If the homepage looks abandoned, categories are broken, or the last blog post is from 2017—skip it.
3) It has editorial or review friction
A little friction is often good:
- manual review
- category selection
- guidelines
- “no low-effort submissions”
That friction is a signal the directory is trying to protect quality.
4) It provides clean listing pages
You want individual listing URLs that are crawlable, readable, and not hidden behind scripts.
5) It’s not packed with obvious spam
If every listing is keyword-stuffed, has weird anchor text, or looks auto-generated—skip.
The directory workflow (developer edition)
Step 1: Create your “canonical business profile” once
Make a single source of truth you can copy/paste everywhere.
Minimum fields:
- Brand name
- Short description (1–2 lines)
- Long description (150–300 words)
- Primary URL
- Contact email
- Location (even if remote)
- Social links
- Category keywords (5–10)
Pro tip: Put this in a private Git repo or a Notion doc and version it. Consistency matters.
Step 2: Decide which pages you actually want to rank
Don’t link every directory listing to your homepage. Use pages that match intent:
- SaaS → link to a dedicated landing page (with product screenshots + pricing)
- Agency → link to services page, not homepage
- Freelancer → link to portfolio page
- Local business → link to location page
Step 3: Build a directory shortlist (10–30 max)
This is where most people fail: they either do too many or random ones.
Directories.Best is useful here because it’s a hub of directories across categories—so you can start with a curated set and then narrow down based on your niche.
Step 4: Submit in batches, and track everything
Create a simple tracker:
- Directory name
- URL of submission page
- Listing URL (once approved)
- Status: submitted / approved / rejected / needs edits
- Login email used
- Notes: category chosen, description used, etc.
If you don’t track, you’ll forget, duplicate, or lose access.
Step 5: After approval, do 2 quick checks
1) Confirm your listing page has:
- correct title/name
- correct URL
- correct category
- clean description
2) Confirm it’s indexable:
- open the listing page
- check it’s not blocked by obvious
noindex - make sure it’s not behind login
Step 6: Revisit quarterly (15 minutes)
Every 3 months:
- check your top listings still exist
- update descriptions if your product changed
- update phone/email if needed
That’s it.
A tiny checklist for “directory-safe” on-page SEO
This is the stuff that prevents directory listings from becoming a mess later:
✅ Use one consistent brand name
If you’re “Acme Dev Studio” on one directory and “AcmeDevStudio.io” on another, you’re creating ambiguity.
✅ Keep descriptions consistent, not identical
Don’t paste the exact same block everywhere. Write 2–3 variants:
- short (160–250 chars)
- medium (300–600 chars)
- long (150–300 words)
✅ Avoid keyword stuffing
Write like a human. Directory visitors are humans.
✅ Use a proper logo
A surprising number of directories display logos prominently. Provide a clean PNG/SVG and a square variant.
Common directory mistakes (and what to do instead)
Mistake: “Submit everywhere”
Do instead: Submit only where it fits your niche. 20 high-quality listings beat 200 junk listings.
Mistake: “Use the homepage for everything”
Do instead: Link to the most relevant landing page.
Mistake: “Forget logins and approvals”
Do instead: Track submissions like you track deployments.
Mistake: “Treat directories as backlinks”
Do instead: Treat them as distribution + credibility.
Where Directories.Best fits in
Directories.Best isn’t trying to be “another directory with everything.”
It’s a curated hub that helps you explore directory options across niches—so you can evaluate faster, shortlist better, and avoid wasting time on low-quality submissions.
If you’re building a tool, running an agency, or launching a service, it’s a practical starting point for doing directory listings the sane way.
Practical starter pack: what to do this weekend
If you want a clean, low-effort plan:
1) Write your canonical business profile (short + long)
2) Pick 1–2 landing pages to use for listings
3) Build a shortlist of 20 directories from Directories.Best
4) Submit to 5 per day for 4 days
5) Track approvals + listing URLs in a sheet
6) Put a quarterly reminder in your calendar
This is one of those boring marketing chores that quietly pays dividends later.
Top comments (0)