Introduction π
You've probably watched your terminal freeze while grep searches through, say, 10 GB of log files. Using ripgrep, this took about 5 seconds, while classic grep was still processing the first gigabyte. This isn't a coincidence. This is the difference between a tool from the 1970s and a modern tool built for today's needs.
In this article, I'll explore why ripgrep (command: rg) has become the standard for code searching in 2026. You'll see concrete examples, benchmarks, and practical tips for daily work.
π This article is also available in Bulgarian: ΠΠ°ΡΠΎ Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π·Π²Π°ΠΌΠ΅ Ripgrep, Π° Π½Π΅ grep ΠΏΡΠ΅Π· 2026 Π³.
What is Ripgrep? π
Ripgrep is a line-oriented search tool written in Rust. It recursively searches directories for text patterns. By default, it respects .gitignore rules and automatically skips hidden files, binary files, and unnecessary directories.
Key Features:
- Speed: Extremely fast, often 10-20x faster than grep
-
Smart defaults: Respects
.gitignore,.ignore, hidden files - Unicode support: Full UTF-8 support without performance loss
- Cross-platform: Works on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Parallelization: Automatically uses all CPU cores
Why is Ripgrep Faster Than grep? β‘
1. Modern Rust Architecture
Ripgrep uses Rust's regex engine, which combines:
- Finite automata: Efficient regular expression processing
- SIMD instructions: Parallel processing of multiple bytes at once
- Aggressive literal optimizations: Searching for literal strings before regex
2. Automatic Parallelization
Unlike grep, ripgrep uses all available CPU cores by default. When searching through thousands of files, this makes a huge difference.
Benchmark Example (Linux kernel source tree):
ripgrep: ~0.06 seconds
GNU grep: ~0.67 seconds
Difference: 11x slower
3. Intelligent Strategy Selection
Ripgrep automatically chooses the optimal strategy:
- Memory maps for single large files
- Incremental buffering for multiple files
- Automatic binary file detection
4. Optimized Line Counting
Ripgrep counts lines using packed comparisons (16 bytes at a time). This is significantly faster than the naive byte-by-byte approach.
Practical Comparisons: Ripgrep vs grep π
Scenario 1: Searching a Large Codebase
Task: Find all uses of a variable in a React project.
# With grep (slow, noisy)
$ time grep -r "useState" . --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git
real 0m8.342s
# With ripgrep (fast, clean)
$ time rg "useState"
real 0m0.089s
Result: Ripgrep is 93x faster in this real scenario.
Scenario 2: Searching with Line Numbers
# grep
$ time grep -rn "function" .
real 0m9.484s
# ripgrep
$ time rg -n "function"
real 0m1.664s
Result: Ripgrep is 5.7x faster with line numbers enabled.
Scenario 3: Real Monorepo (1.4 GB, 250,000 files)
| Tool | Time | Files Scanned |
|---|---|---|
| grep | 45s | 250,000+ |
| ripgrep | 2.3s | ~15,000 |
Ripgrep automatically skipped node_modules, .git, dist, build, and others.
Smart Defaults π―
Automatic Ignoring
Ripgrep automatically respects:
-
.gitignorefiles -
.ignorefiles -
.rgignorefiles - Hidden directories (starting with
.) - Binary files
Example:
# grep requires long exclude flags
grep -r "error" . \
--exclude-dir=node_modules \
--exclude-dir=.git \
--exclude-dir=dist \
--exclude-dir=build \
--exclude-dir=.venv \
--exclude-dir=__pycache__
# ripgrep does this automatically
rg "error"
Automatic Case-Insensitive Search
If your query is all lowercase, ripgrep becomes case-insensitive:
# Automatically case-insensitive
$ rg "error" # finds Error, ERROR, error
# If it has uppercase, becomes case-sensitive
$ rg "Error" # finds only Error, ERROR
Colored Output by Default
No need to add --color=auto. Ripgrep automatically colors results.
Installing Ripgrep π»
Ubuntu/Debian
# Ubuntu 18.10+
sudo apt update
sudo apt install ripgrep
# For older versions or latest release
RIPGREP_VERSION=$(curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases/latest" | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K[0-9.]+')
wget -qO ripgrep.deb "https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases/latest/download/ripgrep_${RIPGREP_VERSION}-1_amd64.deb"
sudo dpkg -i ripgrep.deb
macOS
# With Homebrew
brew install ripgrep
Windows
# With Chocolatey
choco install ripgrep
# With Scoop
scoop install ripgrep
# With winget
winget install BurntSushi.ripgrep.MSVC
Arch Linux
sudo pacman -S ripgrep
Via Cargo (Rust)
cargo install ripgrep
Verify Installation
rg --version
# ripgrep 15.0.1 (or newer)
Practical Usage Examples π οΈ
1. Basic Search
# Search for "TODO" recursively in current directory
rg "TODO"
# Search for exact word
rg "\bfunction\b"
# Case-sensitive search
rg -s "Error"
2. Search by File Type
# Only Python files
rg "import" -t py
# Only JavaScript/TypeScript
rg "useState" -t js -t ts
# Exclude JavaScript
rg "error" -T js
# See all available types
rg --type-list
3. Show Context
# 2 lines before and after match
rg "error" -C 2
# 3 lines before
rg "error" -B 3
# 3 lines after
rg "error" -A 3
4. Search Specific Files
# Search only in .env files
rg "API_KEY" -g "*.env"
# Search in all config files
rg "database" -g "*config*"
# Exclude test files
rg "function" -g "!*test*"
5. Text Replacement (with other tools)
# Find all matches and replace with sed
rg "oldName" -l | xargs sed -i 's/oldName/newName/g'
# Or with modern ripgrep + sd (string-displacing tool)
rg "oldName" -l | xargs sd "oldName" "newName"
6. Search Compressed Files
# Search in .gz, .xz, .bz2, .lz4 files
rg "error" -z
# or
rg "error" --search-zip
7. Show Only File Names
# Show only files containing pattern
rg "TODO" -l
# Show only files NOT containing pattern
rg "TODO" --files-without-match
8. Match Statistics
# Count matches
rg "error" -c
# Show statistics
rg "error" --stats
Advanced Techniques π
1. Combining with Other Tools
# Ripgrep + fzf for interactive search
rg --line-number --no-heading "." | fzf
# Ripgrep + bat for syntax highlighting
rg "function" -l | xargs bat
# Ripgrep + jq for JSON files
rg "userId" --json | jq '.data.text'
2. Using a Config File
Create ~/.ripgreprc:
# Always show line numbers
--line-number
# Always show hidden files
--hidden
# Ignore specific directories
--glob=!.git/
--glob=!node_modules/
--glob=!dist/
Activate it:
export RIPGREP_CONFIG_PATH="$HOME/.ripgreprc"
3. Regex Patterns
# Email addresses
rg "\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,}\b"
# IP addresses
rg "\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b"
# URLs
rg "https?://[^\s]+"
# Hex colors
rg "#[0-9A-Fa-f]{6}\b"
4. Multiline Search
# Search multi-line patterns
rg -U "function.*\{.*\}" -A 5
# PCRE2 regex for complex patterns
rg -P "(?s)function.*?end"
When to Use grep Instead of Ripgrep? π€
There are situations where grep is the better choice:
1. Maximum Portability
Grep is everywhere. If you're writing scripts for multiple systems, grep is safer.
2. POSIX Compliance
Ripgrep is not POSIX-compliant. If you need POSIX compliance, use grep.
3. Piping from stdin
For streaming data and pipe processing, grep is sometimes more suitable:
# grep is good here
ps aux | grep python
# ripgrep works but isn't optimal
ps aux | rg python
4. Minimal Embedded Systems
On systems without the ability to install additional software, grep is the only option.
5. Specific Legacy Scripts
If you have old scripts that rely on grep's exact behavior, migration might create problems.
Ripgrep in CI/CD and Automation π€
GitHub Actions
name: Code Quality
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
check-todos:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Install ripgrep
run: |
wget https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases/download/14.1.0/ripgrep_14.1.0-1_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i ripgrep_14.1.0-1_amd64.deb
- name: Check for TODOs
run: |
if rg "TODO|FIXME" -t py; then
echo "Found TODOs in code!"
exit 1
fi
Docker
FROM ubuntu:22.04
# Install ripgrep
RUN apt-get update && \
apt-get install -y ripgrep && \
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
# Use in scripts
COPY search.sh /usr/local/bin/
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/search.sh
Pre-commit Hooks
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
# Check for debug statements
if rg "console.log|debugger" -t js -t ts --quiet; then
echo "β Found debug statements in code!"
rg "console.log|debugger" -t js -t ts
exit 1
fi
echo "β
No debug statements found"
Performance: Real Numbers π
Test 1: Monorepo (250,000 files, 1.4 GB)
| Operation | grep | ripgrep | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search "error" | 45.2s | 2.3s | 19.6x |
| Regex search | 67.8s | 3.1s | 21.9x |
| Search with -n | 72.4s | 3.8s | 19.0x |
Test 2: Single Large File (10 GB log)
| Operation | grep | ripgrep | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search "ERROR" | 18.2s | 4.8s | 3.8x |
| Regex pattern | 45.6s | 12.3s | 3.7x |
Test 3: Python Codebase (5,000+ files)
# Search import statements
$ time grep -rn "^import " --include="*.py" .
real 0m3.421s
$ time rg "^import " -t py
real 0m0.156s
Result: 21.9x faster for daily tasks.
Common Mistakes and Solutions ββ
Mistake 1: Ripgrep Doesn't Find Files
Problem: rg "text" shows no results, but you know the text exists.
Solution: Files might be ignored.
# Show all files, including ignored ones
rg "text" -u
# Show even hidden and binary
rg "text" -uuu
# Check which files are ignored
rg --files | wc -l
rg --files -u | wc -l
Mistake 2: Slow Search in Home Directory
Problem: rg "something" in /home or / is very slow.
Solution: Limit the scope.
# Search only in specific directory
rg "something" ~/projects/
# Or add --max-depth
rg "something" --max-depth 3
Mistake 3: Regex Doesn't Work as Expected
Problem: Regex from grep doesn't work in ripgrep.
Solution: Use PCRE2 mode.
# Standard regex (might not work)
rg "(?<=@)\w+"
# With PCRE2 support
rg -P "(?<=@)\w+"
Mistake 4: Can't Search UTF-16 Files
Solution: Ripgrep doesn't support UTF-16. Convert first:
iconv -f UTF-16 -t UTF-8 file.txt | rg "pattern"
Conclusion: Why Ripgrep is the Future π
After thoroughly examining ripgrep, here's why it's the right choice in 2026:
Key Advantages:
β
Speed: 10-20x faster than grep in real scenarios
β
Intelligence: Automatic ignoring of unnecessary files
β
Modernity: Built for today's codebases
β
Safety: Written in Rust, memory-safe
β
Convenience: Better defaults, fewer flags
β
Unicode: Full support without performance penalty
β
Parallelization: Automatically uses all cores
When to Start Using Ripgrep:
- β You work with large codebases
- β You search frequently across multiple files
- β
You use git and have
.gitignore - β You value your time and productivity
- β You work with Unicode text
- β You have a multi-core processor
When to Stick with grep:
- β οΈ You write POSIX-compliant scripts
- β οΈ You work on embedded systems without Rust
- β οΈ You have legacy systems without update capability
- β οΈ You process stdin pipes intensively
Additional Resources π
Official Documentation
Useful Tools
- bat: Syntax highlighting cat (works perfectly with rg)
- fd: Modern find (ripgrep's sibling)
- fzf: Fuzzy finder (combines great with rg)
- sd: Modern sed (for text replacement)
Community
Quick Copy Commands π
# Installation
brew install ripgrep # macOS
sudo apt install ripgrep # Ubuntu/Debian
cargo install ripgrep # Rust
# Basic commands
rg "pattern" # Basic search
rg "pattern" -t py # Python only
rg "pattern" -C 2 # With context
rg "pattern" -l # File names only
rg "pattern" -uuu # Search everywhere
# Advanced
rg "pattern" -g "*.{js,ts}" # Specific extensions
rg "pattern" --stats # Show statistics
rg -P "complex.*regex" # PCRE2 regex
rg "pattern" -z # In compressed files
# Configuration
export RIPGREP_CONFIG_PATH="$HOME/.ripgreprc"
Final Thoughts π
Switching from grep to ripgrep isn't just changing a tool. It's modernizing your workflow. In the world of 2026, where codebases grow exponentially and time is precious, ripgrep is the natural choice.
Start today. Install it. Use it for a week. You won't go back.
Good luck! π
Article is current as of January 2026. Ripgrep continues to be actively developed.
π If you found this article useful, consider supporting my work:
π Your support means a lot!
Top comments (0)