DEV Community

Husnain Tariq
Husnain Tariq

Posted on

Why I Switched to a Feature-Based Folder Structure (And Why You Should Too)

As projects grow, the architecture often becomes the silent bottleneck. Recently, I refactored one of my projects by shifting from a traditional file-type folder structure to a feature-based architecture, and the difference has been significant.

In this post, I’ll walk through why I made the switch, how I structured it, and what benefits I gained. Hopefully, this helps you decide if it’s the right move for your project, too.

🔍 The Problem With File-Type Structures

Most React or frontend projects start with something like:

src/
  components/
  hooks/
  utils/
  pages/
  context/
  styles/
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This works… until it doesn’t.

As your project grows, you start jumping between folders just to work on a single feature. A simple update may require touching multiple directories. Files become harder to discover, boundaries blur, and the structure stops scaling.

It’s not wrong, but it eventually slows development.

🧩 The Move to Feature-Based Architecture

A feature-based structure groups everything related to a specific feature in one place:

src/
  features/
    dashboard/
      components/
      hooks/
      services/
      types.ts
      index.ts
    auth/
      components/
      hooks/
      services/
      store/
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Each feature becomes a self-contained module, owning its UI, state, logic, and tests.

⚡ Key Benefits I Experienced

After restructuring, these improvements were immediately noticeable:

1. Better Scalability

Features can grow independently without affecting others.
Large teams especially benefit from this modularity.

2. Faster Navigation

All files related to a feature live together.
No more hunting across folders.

3. Improved Maintainability

Feature boundaries become clearer, reducing complexity.
It’s easier to remove, rewrite, or migrate a feature.

4. Team-Friendly Structure

Developers can work on different features with less conflict and fewer merge issues.

5. Cleaner Imports & Encapsulation

Feature indices allow export consolidation:


// features/auth/index.ts
export * from "./components";
export * from "./hooks";
export * from "./services";

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This leads to cleaner import paths and a more predictable codebase.

📁 Feature-Based Folder Structure — Visual Diagram

A simple visual representation of how a feature-based architecture looks:

src/
│
├── features/
│   ├── auth/
│   │   ├── components/
│   │   ├── hooks/
│   │   ├── services/
│   │   ├── store/
│   │   ├── types.ts
│   │   └── index.ts
│   │
│   ├── dashboard/
│   │   ├── components/
│   │   ├── hooks/
│   │   ├── services/
│   │   ├── types.ts
│   │   └── index.ts
│   │
│   └── profile/
│       ├── components/
│       ├── hooks/
│       ├── services/
│       ├── store/
│       ├── types.ts
│       └── index.ts
│
├── shared/
│   ├── components/
│   ├── hooks/
│   ├── utils/
│   └── constants/
│
└── app/ (Next.js routing)

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🛠️ When You Should Consider Switching

You’ll benefit from a feature-based architecture if:

  • Your app is growing, and new modules are being added regularly.
  • Features are becoming complex
  • Multiple developers contribute
  • Navigation feels slower than it should
  • Refactors feel risky or messy

If you’re in the early stages or building something small, the switch isn’t mandatory, but planning can save time later.

Top comments (0)