WazirX’s recovery didn’t rely on improvisation or PR spin—it was built through structured legal action. Here’s why that matters for crypto’s future.
For years, crypto operated on the belief that it could build outside the system—beyond borders, beneath regulators, above traditional law. But when things go wrong, reality hits: it’s courts, not code, that decide who gets paid and how platforms come back.
The ongoing WazirX restructuring efforts is one of the clearest examples of how crypto is evolving through legal structures. More than a comeback plan, it’s a courtroom-led blueprint that offers the industry something rare: clarity.
At the center of it all is a Singapore court, a Scheme of Arrangement, and a series of rulings and regulator inputs that show how crypto platforms can recover within the law, not around it.
This isn’t just about WazirX. It’s about how crypto restructures from here on out.
Regulatory Clarity: MAS Defined the Boundaries
During court proceedings, one major question emerged: would a one-time distribution of digital assets violate the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) in Singapore?
Rather than making assumptions, WazirX (via Zettai) engaged directly with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
The result: MAS confirmed that if the distribution was:
Non-commercial,
One-off,
Outside Singapore,
And court-supervised,
…it did not constitute a regulated digital token service under FSMA.
This wasn’t just a regulatory win—it created a clear compliance perimeter for distressed platforms seeking to return value to users lawfully. MAS defined the path.
Jurisdictional Realignment: Zettai Steps Back, Zanmai Steps Up
The Singapore court flagged another concern: can a non-FIU-IND registered entity like Zettai legally serve Indian users?
The answer lay in how responsibilities were divided:
Zettai (Singapore): Managing the one-off crypto distribution, not onboarding Indian users, and is not touching INR.
Zanmai (India): FIU-IND registered, handles all INR and user-facing operations.
The court’s feedback can lead to a formal pivot in the recovery plan:
Zanmai India became the operator for crypto-crypto services and user withdrawals.
Zettai stepped out of the picture entirely.
That realignment brought the scheme into full compliance with both Singaporean and Indian regulatory frameworks.
It wasn’t about optics—it was about making jurisdictional accountability airtight.
Structured Recovery: Using Law Instead of Workarounds
At the heart of WazirX’s plan was a Scheme of Arrangement, a tool well known in traditional finance but rarely used in crypto.
Why it worked:
It allowed a court to approve and oversee the platform’s restructuring.
It established a binding, enforceable framework for user asset distribution.
It offered creditors (users) legal clarity, not just promises.
In crypto, recoveries often look like improvised roadmaps or vague announcements. WazirX’s use of this court-supervised mechanism shows what happens when legal tools replace trial-and-error responses.
The takeaway? We don’t need new laws—just better use of the ones that exist.
Why the Crypto Industry Should Pay Attention
The WazirX recovery shows us what a compliant, cross-jurisdictional crypto comeback can look like:
A structured path through the courts
Regulator sign-off from MAS
FIU-IND oversight in India
Asset control aligned with legal entities
User protections built into the plan
Crypto doesn’t need less regulation. It needs smarter application of existing legal infrastructure.
Legal Infrastructure Is the Real Innovation
What WazirX is building through the Singapore courts isn’t just a recovery plan—it’s a case study in how crypto platforms should pursue legal, regulator-backed restructuring.
With MAS offering clarity, Zanmai India ensuring local compliance, and the High Court keeping a check on every detail, this process is shaping up to be one of the most structured crypto comebacks we’ve seen to date.
The outcome is still pending. But the direction is clear.
This approach—transparent, jurisdictionally sound, and user-protective—could offer the wider industry a roadmap for how to face disruption without abandoning accountability.
In a space known for improvisation, this is structure.
In an industry that’s built on trust, this is how it’s earned back.
Top comments (0)