A recent KubeHA security posture scan surfaced the following runtime and configuration risks:
- Privileged Pods: 7
- Pods running as root: 3
- Secrets exposure: 1
- RBAC misconfigurations: None detected ✅
📌 Why SREs should care
- Privileged pods bypass key kernel isolation boundaries and significantly expand the failure and attack surface
- Containers running as UID 0 remain one of the most common causes of escalation paths in Kubernetes breaches
- Even a single exposed secret can compromise workloads, CI/CD pipelines, or control-plane access
- Clean RBAC indicates strong identity scoping – but needs continuous verification as clusters evolve
⚙️ What KubeHA does differently
KubeHA continuously correlates:
- Security context & pod spec configs
- Runtime behavior and cluster events
- RBAC state, secrets usage, and config drift …to highlight real risk, not just noisy violations.
This enables SRE teams to:
✔ catch risky workloads early
✔ prevent drift from baseline security standards
✔ prioritize fixes based on blast radius and impact
Kubernetes security is not a point-in-time scan.
It’s a continuous reliability problem.
Follow KubeHA (https://linkedin.com/showcase/kubeha-ara/)
Experience KubeHA today: www.KubeHA.com
KubeHA’s introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyzTQPLGaD0
Top comments (3)
At times, Kubernetes Security & Config Drift are fatal.
True, that's why KubeHA does a brilliant job!
Correct!