After completing the Commonwealth Bank Software Engineering Challenge and my AWS Solutions Architect journey, I was hungry for the next one. That's when I discovered Tata's GenAI Powered Data Analytics simulation on Forage.
As a master's-degree hustler who enjoys stacking tough problems, I figured this would sharpen my edge in AI strategy. Spoiler: it was SO much more than that.
"Comfort is the enemy. Keep moving."
Here's my story of how I tackled a real consulting scenario—predicting delinquency risk, designing ethical AI systems, and building an end-to-end GenAI-powered analytics solution.
Want to jump in yourself? Check out the simulation here before reading. SPOILER ALERT ahead!
The Scenario: AI Transformation Consultant
The simulation places you in the role of an AI transformation consultant working with Geldium Finance's collections team. Here's the brief:
Client: Geldium Finance
Problem: High delinquency rates, inefficient collections, no AI strategy
Goal: Design a GenAI-powered analytics solution for predicting delinquency risk and building an ethical, scalable collections strategy
This wasn't just another theoretical exercise. This was about impact.
The Challenge: Three Interconnected Problems
What I loved about this simulation was that it wasn't compartmentalized. Each task built on the previous one, mirroring how real consulting actually works.
Task 1: Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) with GenAI
The first task dropped a real dataset on my desk: customer financial data with delinquency flags. My job? Conduct an EDA using GenAI tools to assess data quality, identify risk indicators, and structure insights for predictive modeling.
Instead of spending hours staring at correlation matrices, I used GenAI as a thinking partner—Claude and ChatGPT helped me structure hypotheses, identify outliers, and surface patterns I might have missed. Pure momentum.
The mindset shift: GenAI isn't about replacing analysis—it's about amplifying insight generation at scale.
Task 2: Designing a Predictive Modeling Framework
With EDA insights in hand, Task 2 asked me to design an initial no-code predictive modeling framework to assess customer delinquency risk.
No-code. That's the kicker. In the traditional ML world, we jump straight to scikit-learn and TensorFlow. But Tata's simulation forced me to think about business feasibility, scalability, and explainability before touching a single line of code.
I proposed a structured framework that leveraged GenAI to:
- Define logic for risk scoring without complex algorithms
- Create transparent, auditable decision pathways
- Generate evaluation criteria that align with business goals
- Design for regulatory compliance from day one
This exercise taught me something crucial: the best models are often the ones non-technical stakeholders actually understand and trust.
Task 3: Architecting an AI-Driven Collections Strategy
The final challenge was the juicy one. Design a comprehensive collections strategy that:
- Leveraged agentic AI (AI agents that can take autonomous actions)
- Incorporated ethical AI principles and fairness considerations
- Met regulatory compliance requirements
- Scaled across thousands of customers
I spent time thinking about:
- How do you design AI automation that reduces bias rather than amplifies it?
- What does a scalable implementation framework actually look like?
- How do you balance aggressive collections efforts with customer empathy?
The answer wasn't a 200-page architecture document. It was a thoughtful, actionable strategy that balanced business needs with ethical responsibilities.
Why This Challenge Hits Different
Unlike cookie-cutter tutorials, this simulation felt alive. Here's why:
1. Real-World Messiness
The data wasn't clean. The requirements weren't perfectly aligned. The business constraints were genuinely contradictory at times. This forced me to make trade-offs and justify decisions—just like in actual work.
2. GenAI Integration (Not AI Replacement)
Rather than asking "how do I build an AI solution?" it asked "how do I use AI tools to solve a business problem?" That's a fundamentally different question, and way more interesting.
3. Ethical Complexity
Collections is a sensitive business. The simulation didn't shy away from fairness, bias, and regulatory concerns. It forced me to think about impact beyond accuracy metrics.
4. Progressive Scaffolding
Each task built naturally on the previous one. By Task 3, I had context and data to make informed architectural decisions. It didn't feel like disconnected modules—it felt like a real consulting engagement.
5. Forage's Presentation
The simulation was polished, professional, and genuinely engaging. The client emails felt real. The scenarios were plausible. This elevated the whole experience from "training exercise" to "legitimate portfolio piece."
What I Built
Here's what I delivered:
| Deliverable | What It Does |
|---|---|
| EDA Summary Report | Data quality assessment, risk indicator identification, structured insights |
| Predictive Modeling Framework | No-code risk scoring logic with transparent decision pathways |
| Collections Strategy | Ethical AI architecture with implementation roadmap and regulatory alignment |
| Streamlit Application | Interactive dashboard for EDA and model planning |
Tech Stack
- Python + Pandas for data wrangling
- Streamlit for the interactive dashboard
- GenAI (Claude/ChatGPT/Grok) as thinking partners throughout
- Markdown for structured documentation
Key Takeaways
This challenge reinforced critical principles I apply to every project:
- Start with the business problem: Every model decision should trace back to impact
- GenAI amplifies, doesn't replace: Use it as a thinking partner, not a crutch
- Explainability > Complexity: The best models are ones stakeholders trust
- Ethics aren't optional: Fairness and compliance must be baked in from day one
- Ship something real: I didn't just write reports—I built a working Streamlit app
Try It Yourself
Again, if you'd like to give this challenge a shot:
👉 Tata GenAI Data Analytics Simulation
Then come back and tell me:
- What surprised you most?
- How did your approach to analysis shift?
- What ethical dilemmas did you wrestle with?
I genuinely want to hear your takes. The beauty of challenges like this is there's no single right answer—just thoughtful problem-solving.
Potential Next Steps
The foundation is solid. Here's where this could go:
| Enhancement | Description |
|---|---|
| Advanced Visualizations | More sophisticated Streamlit dashboards |
| ML Model Implementation | Validate the no-code framework with actual models |
| Ethical AI Documentation | Lessons learned in bias mitigation |
| Prompting Strategies | Deep dive into GenAI techniques that worked |
Final Thoughts
This project stretched me across roles: data analyst, ML strategist, consultant, and engineer. But that's the point—real problems don't come in neat boxes.
I walked away with a working application, solid documentation, and a sharper perspective on how GenAI fits into enterprise analytics. That's the kind of outcome I bring to every engagement.
Go give it a shot. I'll be watching for your takes in the comments. 🚀
Top comments (0)