When I first began learning about digital accessibility, I was working with a small team at a startup where we were juggling deadlines, sprint cycles, and a mountain of user feedback. Our product manager casually dropped a line during a retro: “We should probably start doing accessibility checks, too.”
At the time, none of us really knew what that meant. We'd heard the term WCAG tossed around, we vaguely understood that contrast ratios mattered, and we’d all seen that dreaded screen reader toggle on our browsers, but when it came to actually testing our digital product for accessibility? We were totally in the dark.
That’s when we realized we needed help- and not just from a checklist. We needed a tool that would work with our team, not against it.
Fast forward a few years and countless tools tested, I’ve learned one big truth: not all automated accessibility testing tools are created equal.
So, if you're in a similar spot, trying to figure out how to choose the right tool for your team, this guide is for you.
Why Accessibility Matters More Than Ever
Let’s get one thing clear: accessibility isn’t optional anymore.
According to the CDC, roughly 1 in 4 U.S. adults lives with a disability. That’s a huge portion of your user base. Add to that the rise in lawsuits around non-compliant websites, and the ethical imperative of inclusive design, and it becomes obvious- accessibility is everyone’s responsibility.
Automated tools help teams catch common accessibility errors early and often. But here’s the catch: if the tool doesn’t fit your workflow, you won’t use it. Or worse, you’ll rely on it too much, missing the human side of testing altogether.
So, how do you find the one that supports your team?
Step 1: Understand Your Team’s Maturity Level
Let’s face it- every team is at a different stage in its accessibility journey.
- Are you new to accessibility testing altogether?
You’ll want a tool with simple onboarding, clear documentation, and educational feedback, not just error messages.
- Is your team mid-level, with some accessibility practices in place?
Look for deeper integrations with your tech stack and the ability to customize rules or suppress false positives.
- Are you part of a large enterprise with a mature DevOps system?
You might need API access, CI/CD pipeline compatibility, or cross-team dashboards for audits.
If your tool doesn’t match your team’s pace or maturity, it’ll quickly gather dust, or worse, give you a false sense of compliance.
Step 2: Prioritize the Right Features
Every tool promises to “catch 98% of accessibility issues” or some similar claim. But here’s what you need to look for:
✅ Actionable Feedback
Does the tool explain why something is wrong and how to fix it in plain English? If your developers are constantly Googling what “aria-hidden” means, the tool isn’t helping.
✅ Real-Time Testing
Can it run as you code? Tools that offer browser plugins or integrate with your IDE help catch issues before they make it to staging.
✅ CI/CD Integration
Automation is the name of the game. Your tool should fit into your deployment pipeline so that accessibility is tested just like functionality or performance.
✅ Customization & Flexibility
Can you tailor rulesets for your design system? Can you exclude certain components or ignore known issues?
✅ Collaboration
Does it help devs, designers, and QA all work from the same playbook? Bonus points for tools that allow tagging, commenting, or assigning issues to team members.
Step 3: Evaluate Reporting and Visibility
You’d be surprised how many tools spit out a laundry list of issues… and leave it at that.
Effective automated accessibility testing tools provide clear, visual reports that prioritize by severity and help you track progress over time.
Look for:
- Trend tracking across sprints or releases
- Team-level dashboards
- WCAG level filtering (A, AA, AAA)
- Support for multilingual content (if relevant)
A good report doesn’t just tell you what’s broken. It helps you tell a story to your stakeholders: Here’s what we’re fixing. Here’s why it matters.
Step 4: Consider the Tool’s Long-Term Value
Sometimes, you find a tool that’s easy to set up… but impossible to grow with.
Think long-term:
- Will this tool support mobile app testing if we go there?
- How often is it updated to reflect new WCAG standards?
- Does the company offer support or training for our team?
- What’s their pricing model- by scan, by page, or by usage?
This is where tools like TestEvolve have caught my attention. It’s not just another scanner; it’s a full suite that integrates accessibility testing into your broader QA process. You can run accessibility checks alongside functional testing, and the reports are detailed enough for your devs but readable enough for your designers and PMs.
Plus, TestEvolve allows for visual regression testing and customizable workflows, which means you’re not locked into a rigid setup. That kind of flexibility becomes really important as your team scales or pivots.
Step 5: Don’t Forget the Human Factor
Here’s the truth: Automated accessibility testing tools can only catch about 30–40% of issues, depending on what you’re building.
They’re amazing for flagging:
- Missing alt text
- Improper heading structure
- Color contrast issues
- Non-descriptive link labels
But they can’t judge whether your alt text is meaningful. Or whether your tab order makes sense. Or whether someone using a screen reader can actually complete a task.
That’s where human testing comes in usability testing with assistive tech users, audits by accessibility experts, and regular empathy-building exercises within your team.
So, the tool you choose should be part of a larger strategy, not the whole strategy.
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right automated accessibility testing tool isn’t about finding the “best” one- it’s about finding the right one for your people, your workflow, and your mission.
Start by being honest about where you are. Then pick a tool that meets you there and grows with you.
Whether you’re at a scrappy startup or a well-oiled enterprise team, accessibility doesn’t have to be overwhelming. With the right tools and the right mindset, you’ll not only build more inclusive products, but you’ll also build a stronger, more empathetic culture.
And if you’re exploring your options, give tools like TestEvolve a closer look. Its integrated approach to QA and accessibility makes it a smart choice for teams who want to embed inclusive thinking into their everyday work, not just their compliance checklist.
Because at the end of the day, accessibility isn’t about perfection. It’s about progress. And every click, every line of code, every user test, it all adds up.
Top comments (0)