DEV Community

Cover image for Designing for Scale at the Wrong Cost
ruth mhlanga
ruth mhlanga

Posted on

Designing for Scale at the Wrong Cost

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

Looking back, we realize we were trying to solve the wrong problem. Our focus was on the presentation layer, ensuring the UI was snappy and responsive. While this was crucial for user experience, it masked the real issue: our backend, which relied on a hodgepodge of third-party APIs and homegrown integrations, was struggling to keep up. The more users we added, the more requests flooded in, and our latency shot through the roof.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Our first attempt was to throw more computing power at the problem, scaling up our instance sizes and adding new nodes to the cluster. We figured that with more resources, we could handle the increased load and keep the system responsive. But what we didn't account for was the hidden cost of distributed transactions, the overhead of coordination, and the inevitable cascading failures when components started to fail. Our system was a house of cards, and it wasn't long before it came crashing down.

The Architecture Decision

The turning point came when we realized that our problem wasn't about having more resources, but about how we were using them. We decided to take a step back and rebuild our system from the ground up, this time with a focus on event-driven architecture. By decoupling our components and using message queues to handle communication, we were able to reduce latency and increase throughput. We also took the opportunity to rip out the unnecessary APIs and integrations, replacing them with a simpler, more robust system.

What The Numbers Said After

The results were nothing short of astonishing. Our average latency plummeted from 500ms to under 50ms, and our system was able to handle a 5x increase in requests without breaking a sweat. We were also able to reduce our instance sizes and save on costs, which was a welcome bonus.

What I Would Do Differently

If I'm being honest, there's one thing I would do differently: I would have taken the hint from our latency graph sooner. There's a point of diminishing returns with scaling, and we passed it without even realizing it. Instead of throwing more resources at the problem, I would have focused on optimizing our existing infrastructure and reducing the complexity of our system. It's a lesson we're taking to heart as we continue to grow and scale our event platform.


The fee delta between custodial and non-custodial payment rails at scale is a data story worth reading: https://payhip.com/ref/dev8


Top comments (0)