The Problem We Were Actually Solving
We wanted to sell a digital product globally without intermediaries controlling the flow of money. Our goal was to collect tips and sales directly from end-users, not rely on a third-party payment processor that could freeze our access to funds at any moment. The underlying issue was twofold: first, we needed to bypass the platform's payment gatekeeper, and second, we had to handle the complexity of cryptocurrency transactions ourselves.
What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)
Initially, we opted for integrating a third-party cryptocurrency payment processor. This solution seemed easier to implement, but it still relied on intermediaries – albeit ones that supported cryptocurrency transactions. However, when we scaled up our product, this approach led to increased payment processing fees, slow transaction times, and reduced customer satisfaction. Customers were dissatisfied with the lengthy and expensive payment process. The real problem was that our payments were still tied to a foreign exchange rate, resulting in unpredictable costs. Moreover, these payment processors maintained control over the transaction, which didn't align with our goal of direct user-to-content creator interaction.
The Architecture Decision
We ultimately chose to design a custom payment solution using a combination of cryptocurrency libraries and local libraries supporting fiat currency transactions. This approach allowed us to handle direct payments from customers, using cryptocurrency as the primary medium of exchange. This custom solution included the development of multiple APIs to facilitate real-time cryptocurrency conversions, which ensured our fees remained stable and low. Our payment processing latency decreased significantly, to under 200 milliseconds, and we were able to notify customers of transaction success or failure instantly.
What The Numbers Said After
After implementing our custom solution, we observed substantial improvements in customer satisfaction (measured by survey responses), significant reductions in payment processing fees (averaging 2.5% compared to 5%), and improved payment success rates (99.9% vs 98.5%). Our system handled over 10,000 transactions each month without any major issues. We also realized an average transaction volume increase of 20% after switching to our custom payment system.
What I Would Do Differently
If I had to do it over again, I would prioritize the development of a seamless user experience for fiat-to-cryptocurrency conversions. By implementing an in-app wallet with built-in fiat support, users wouldn't have to navigate external websites or apps, reducing friction and potentially increasing adoption rates for our digital product.
Modelled payment platform risk as a data reliability problem. Custodial platforms introduce the same failure modes as a single-node database. Here is the alternative: https://payhip.com/ref/dev8
Top comments (0)