When migrating from relational databases to Amazon DynamoDB, one of the most significant mindset shifts is understanding that read access patterns dictate your data model far more than write patterns. While this approach unlocks DynamoDB's incredible performance at scale, it also introduces unique challenges.
Introduction
In SQL databases, you typically design your tables around the data's inherent structure, normalizing it to avoid redundancy. Queries then join these tables to assemble the data needed for a specific read operation. The write process is often straightforward: insert or update data into the relevant tables.
DynamoDB flips this script. Lacking joins, its efficiency hinges on retrieving all necessary data for a query in a single request. This means your table and index design must be meticulously crafted to support how data will be read by your application.
The reason for focusing almost exclusively on access patterns (reads) when designing the Primary Key (PK) and Sort Key (SK) in DynamoDB is rooted in DynamoDB's fundamental design philosophy: optimizing for fast, predictable performance at scale by minimizing the need for expensive operations.
The Concept: Mapping Access Patterns to Keys
In DynamoDB, the Primary Key, which can be a simple Partition Key or a composite of a Partition Key and a Sort Key, is the only required factor for data access (aside from a full table Scan, which you should almost always avoid).
1. The Partition Key (PK)
Concept: The PK determines the physical partition (storage bucket) where data is stored. All items with the same PK are grouped together on one or more storage nodes. For a Query operation, the PK is required and must be an exact match.
Design Goal: The PK should map to the most common lookup query that targets a group of related items or a single unique entity.
Distribution Goal: To prevent a "hot partition" (a single storage node getting all the traffic), the PK should have high cardinality (many unique values) and ensure that your application's workload is distributed evenly across these values.
2. The Sort Key (SK)
Concept: The SK defines the sort order of items within a single partition (i.e., among items that share the same PK). The combination of PK and SK must be unique for every item in the table.
Design Goal: The SK should map to the attribute you frequently use to filter, sort, or retrieve a range of items after first selecting a partition.
Efficiency: Using the SK with a Query operation allows you to use condition expressions like begins_with, between, >, and < to retrieve a specific subset of items from the partition without having to read the entire partition and filter the results manually (which is inefficient).
DynamoDB's Performance Constraints
No Joins 🚫
Unlike relational databases, DynamoDB does not support joins. In a relational database, you normalize your data (break it into many tables) and then join the tables at query time to fulfill a read. DynamoDB achieves high-scale, low-latency performance by eliminating this computationally expensive step.
Query Limitations 🔑
DynamoDB's most efficient read operations - GetItem (single item) and Query (all items with the same PK, optionally filtered by SK)-are heavily dependent on the PK and SK structure.
A Query operation is an efficient, targeted lookup that must specify the Partition Key (PK) and can optionally use the Sort Key (SK) to retrieve a range of items within that partition.
If you can't satisfy a read with a Query or GetItem, you must use a Scan, which reads every single item in the table or index and is extremely inefficient, slow, and expensive, especially as the table grows.
The Primary Key must be designed to group and order the data in a way that allows the application's required read operations (access patterns) to be fulfilled using fast Query operations
Most Common Use Cases Where Read-First Modeling Shines
This read-centric approach is crucial for high-performance, high-scale applications that are the bread and butter of DynamoDB.
Why Focus on Access Patterns (Reads)
The emphasis on reads is a direct consequence of DynamoDB's distributed architecture and performance characteristics.
✅ Why to Focus on Reads
No Joins Means Pre-Joined Data for Reads: DynamoDB does not support JOIN operations. To avoid multiple, costly database calls, you must structure your data (often through denormalization and Single Table Design) so that related items can be retrieved efficiently together using a single Query or GetItem request. Your PK and SK must reflect these relationships for optimal read performance.
Query vs. Scan: This is paramount. DynamoDB's efficient read operations (GetItem and Query) are heavily dependent on your PK and SK design. If your read patterns don't align with these keys, you are forced to use a Scan operation, which reads every item in the table (or index). Scan operations are slow, expensive, and generally must be avoided in production applications.
Predictable Latency at Scale: By designing keys to serve specific access patterns, you ensure that even as your data grows to terabytes, your Query operations remain fast and predictable (single-digit milliseconds), because they only access a small, targeted portion of your data.
Cost Optimization: Query operations consume far fewer Read Capacity Units (RCUs) than Scan operations. An effectively modeled table reduces operational costs significantly.
Global Secondary Indexes (GSIs) are Read-Focused: GSIs exist solely to support alternative read access patterns that the primary key cannot efficiently handle. They essentially create a secondary "view" of your data, optimized for different queries.
Practical Application and Examples
Consider an E-commerce Platform with these common access patterns:
Design Decision
To satisfy these patterns efficiently, we adopt a Single-Table Design using generic PK and SK attribute names to store multiple types of entities (User, Order, OrderItem).
Querying Examples
1. To satisfy P1 (Get a specific User):
- PK: USER#123
- SK: METADATA#123
- Operation: GetItem
- Result: Returns the User metadata
2. To satisfy P2 (Get all Orders for User 123):
- PK: USER#123
- SK: (No condition, returns all items in partition)
- Operation: Query
- Result: Returns the User metadata item AND all their Order items, sorted by the SK (Order Date).
3. To satisfy P3 (Get all Orders for User 123 from Jan 1st, 2025 to Jan 31st, 2025):
- PK: USER#123
- SK Condition: BETWEEN 'ORDER#2025-01-01' AND 'ORDER#2025-01-31'
- Operation: Query
- Result: Efficiently fetches only the Orders within that date range from the user's partition.
In this design, the Partition Key groups the data that is queried together, and the Sort Key organizes that data within the group to allow for efficient filtering and ordering.
Why Write Operations are less focused (Mostly) ✅
DynamoDB's core write operations (PutItem, UpdateItem, DeleteItem) only require the full primary key (PK + SK) to locate the specific item. As long as you know the key, the write will be fast and predictable, regardless of how the data will be read later.
Write Speed: The speed of a single write operation primarily depends on the even distribution of the Partition Key to avoid "hot partitions" (a single partition receiving too much traffic), which is a consideration for both reads and writes, not just writes.
Denormalization: A core part of DynamoDB data modeling is denormalization (duplicating data and storing related items together) to facilitate fast reads. While this makes the write process more complex (you may have to write to multiple items or indexes), it does not fundamentally change the key structure needed for the write operation itself. You still just need the unique key.
💡 Example: Updating a Product Name
Consider an e-commerce platform with the following items modeled for fast reads:
Product Item: PK = PRODUCT#, SK = METADATA (contains productName, description, price)
Order Item (for display): PK = ORDER#, SK = ITEM# (contains productName, quantity, price at time of order)
GSI1 for Category lookup: GSI1PK = CATEGORY#, GSI1SK = PRODUCT# (might also project productName)
Pain Point: If you update the productName for PRODUCT#123, you might have to:
- Update the PRODUCT#123 item in the main table.
- (Potentially) Update productName in any active Order items that haven't been completed yet, if your access patterns require seeing the latest name on pending orders.
- Wait for the GSI to become consistent if the productName is projected into GSI1 and you immediately query it.
This complex cascade of writes is the trade-off for blazing-fast reads.
The trade-off is accepted because the resulting predictable, single-digit millisecond read latency is critical for operating at massive scale.
Here’s how big companies address each part of the “pain point”:
- Ensuring Atomicity for Denormalized Writes: Transactions
- Handling Eventual Consistency: DynamoDB Streams
- Mitigation and Design Practices
For more Detail visit my next blog (I’ll provide the link here after finished)
Best Practices to Follow
When prioritizing read access patterns in DynamoDB, these practices are essential to manage the complexities:
Document All Access Patterns Explicitly: Before modeling, list every GetItem, Query, and potential Scan (to be avoided!) your application will perform. Group them by entity and required data.
Design Keys for Query First: Your primary focus should be to ensure all critical reads can be fulfilled by GetItem or Query operations on your base table or a GSI.
Embrace Denormalization Judiciously: Duplicate data where necessary to avoid extra database calls during reads. Understand the implications for write amplification.
Use Transactions for Complex Writes: For scenarios where a single logical operation requires atomic updates across multiple items (due to denormalization), use DynamoDB Transactions (TransactWriteItems) to ensure all or none of the changes are applied.
Utilize TTL for Ephemeral Data: For denormalized data that is only temporarily needed (e.g., shopping cart items, session data), use Time-to-Live (TTL) to automatically prune old records and reduce storage costs.
Implement Idempotent Writes: Design your write operations to be idempotent, meaning executing them multiple times produces the same result. This helps when dealing with retries due to network issues or eventual consistency.
Monitor Write Throttling: Pay close attention to CloudWatch metrics for WriteThrottleEvents to ensure your Partition Keys are distributing write load evenly and you're not encountering hot partitions.
Summary of Priority
Conclusion
DynamoDB's strength lies in its ability to deliver consistent, high performance at massive scale, primarily achieved by optimizing for targeted read access. This necessitates a "read-first" approach to data modeling, where your Primary Key and Sort Key are meticulously designed to support your application's most critical query patterns.
While this strategy introduces complexity on the write side, demanding careful denormalization, transaction management, and an understanding of eventual consistency, the payoff in predictable, low-latency reads for high-scale applications is often well worth the effort. The choice boils down to leveraging DynamoDB's fundamental design for maximum efficiency in your specific use case.
Top comments (0)