In the realm of email marketing and communication, avoiding spam traps is a critical challenge for maintaining sender reputation and ensuring message deliverability. Spam traps are email addresses used by ISPs and anti-spam organizations to catch spammers and unsolicited mailers. Once a sender is flagged, their emails risk being filtered out or blacklisted. Traditional solutions often rely heavily on third-party tools or extensive documentation, which may not be practical for security researchers or developers working with constrained resources.
As a security researcher with expertise in Go, I embarked on designing an approach to identify and mitigate spam traps more effectively. The key was to utilize Go’s concurrency features, self-contained modules, and simple network capabilities without relying on comprehensive external documentation. This minimal-dependency strategy is highly adaptable and scalable.
Understanding the Problem
Spam traps are generally static (freshly created email addresses) or recycled (previously active addresses now identified as traps). They do not engage with mailing lists but are used to monitor sending patterns. To avoid spam traps, senders must verify the validity of email addresses and track interactions.
The goal was to develop a lightweight Go script to validate email addresses and flag potential spam traps, leveraging minimal external dependencies and focusing on direct SMTP checks.
Building an Email Validator in Go
The core idea is to connect directly to the recipient domain’s mail server via SMTP and perform an incremental check for the recipient’s existence without sending an email.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net"
"net/smtp"
"strings"
"sync"
)
// validateEmail checks if an email address exists via SMTP
func validateEmail(email string) bool {
parts := strings.Split(email, "@")
if len(parts) != 2 {
return false
}
domain := parts[1]
// Lookup MX records
mxRecords, err := net.LookupMX(domain)
if err != nil || len(mxRecords) == 0 {
return false
}
// Connect to each mail server
for _, mx := range mxRecords {
server := fmt.Sprintf("%s:25", strings.TrimSuffix(mx.Host, "."))
conn, err := net.Dial("tcp", server)
if err != nil {
continue
}
client, err := smtp.NewClient(conn, mx.Host)
if err != nil {
conn.Close()
continue
}
defer client.Close()
// Identify from address
if err := client.Rcpt(email); err == nil {
return true // Address exists
}
conn.Close()
}
return false
}
func main() {
emails := []string{"test@example.com", "invalid@domain.com"}
var wg sync.WaitGroup
results := make(chan string, len(emails))
for _, email := range emails {
wg.Add(1)
go func(e string) {
defer wg.Done()
if validateEmail(e) {
results <- fmt.Sprintf("%s is valid.", e)
} else {
results <- fmt.Sprintf("%s is invalid or a spam trap.", e)
}
}(email)
}
wg.Wait()
close(results)
for res := range results {
fmt.Println(res)
}
}
This script performs DNS MX record lookups for the recipient’s domain, then attempts an SMTP connection to verify if the email address exists without sending an email. It uses Go’s net and net/smtp packages to keep dependencies minimal and control the validation flow.
Practical Considerations
While this approach is lightweight, it isn't foolproof. Some mail servers implement catch-all responses or prevent SMTP validation to trick spammers, which can lead to false negatives or positives. Additionally, this method might be flagged by some email servers if used excessively.
To enhance reliability, combine SMTP validation with other heuristics such as pattern matching, syntax validation, and interaction history. Incorporating feedback loops and monitoring bounce rates is also essential.
Final Thoughts
Using Go for such security-focused applications offers a compact, performant, and self-sufficient solution to a complex problem like spam trap avoidance. The outlined approach demonstrates how a minimalistic, code-centric strategy can empower developers and security researchers to build effective tools without relying heavily on external documentation or proprietary APIs.
This method can be extended further with concurrency control, logging, and integration into larger integrity systems, aligning with the principles of secure and sustainable email management.
🛠️ QA Tip
To test this safely without using real user data, I use TempoMail USA.
Top comments (0)