Why I Built a Portfolio Without Projects: The Experience-First Approach
After six years in the tech industry, I realized something was fundamentally broken about how we present ourselves as engineers. Every portfolio I saw followed the same tired formula: a grid of projects with screenshots, tech stacks, and GitHub links. But here's the thing, none of these portfolios told me what I actually wanted to know: What was it like to work with this person?
So I threw out the playbook and built something different.
The Problem with Project-Centric Portfolios
Traditional portfolios focus on what you built, but they miss the how and why. They showcase finished products but hide the messy, collaborative reality of software engineering. When I looked at my own work, the most valuable contributions weren't standalone projects but experiences:
- Working with cross-functional teams to reduce manual processing time
- Building EHR integration layers that connected multiple health systems
- Establishing coding standards that improved team velocity
- Designing error handling that made beyond 9-5 debugging bearable
These weren't "projects" in the traditional sense. They were experiences that shaped how I approach engineering challenges.
The Experience-First Portfolio Concept
Instead of showcasing projects, I built my portfolio around expertise pillars that represent different types of engineering experiences. I built an entire site around it.
The home page ditches the typical hero section with a generic tagline. Instead, it opens with eight rotating expertise cards in a horizontal marquee, each one telling a story about a different type of engineering challenge I've tackled. No screenshots, no GitHub links, just the human experience of building systems with teams.
Each card follows the same structure but tells a completely different story:
- Enterprise Architecture & Team Collaboration: "In my current role, I work with cross-functional teams on architectural decisions for internal automation systems, helping reduce manual processing time through collaborative workflow analysis."
- Frontend Systems & User Experience Engineering: "Building clinician-facing dashboards using React and Angular taught me how responsive interfaces can genuinely enhance user engagement across diverse device landscapes."
What makes this work is the specificity. Instead of saying "I built a React app," I explain the context, the collaboration, and the outcome. Each pillar includes proof, impact, tooling, and measurable outcomes.
Why This Approach Works Better
1. It Shows Operational Empathy
Traditional portfolios show polished demos. Experience-focused portfolios show you understand production realities, team dynamics, and business constraints.
2. It Demonstrates Long-Term Thinking
Anyone can build a todo app. Not everyone can maintain a system for six years, see it scale, and learn from architectural decisions over time.
3. It Highlights Collaboration
Software engineering is a team sport. By focusing on experiences, I can showcase how I work with teams rather than just what I built for them.
4. It's More Honest
Let's be real: most "personal projects" in portfolios are contrived examples that don't reflect real engineering challenges. Experiences are authentic.
The Four-Page Architecture That Tells a Complete Story
Here's where it gets interesting. Instead of the usual About/Projects/Contact structure, I designed four interconnected pages that each serve a specific purpose in understanding how I work:
Timeline - The Journey
This isn't your typical career timeline with job titles and dates. It's structured like a story with three distinct "eras," each with animated milestone nodes and detailed context about what I learned during each phase.
The visual design uses a dynamic scroll-animated line that fills as you read, connecting each era to show progression. But the real value is in how each era explains not just what I did, but how it shaped my approach to engineering. The healthcare technology section, for example, doesn't just list technologies but explains how six years at one company taught me lessons about architectural decisions that job hopping never could.
Articles - The Thinking Process
Rather than a blog grid, this page showcases four carefully selected technical articles that demonstrate different aspects of my problem-solving approach. Each article gets a custom abstract icon and a summary that explains the engineering insight, not just the technical topic.
The layout is clean and scannable, with hover states that reveal the cursor indicator (a simple ">" symbol) that appears throughout the site. What's clever here is that the articles aren't just technical tutorials but stories about decision-making, tool selection, and community building.
Mindset - The Philosophy
This is where most portfolios would have an "About" page with personal details. Instead, I created a deep dive into three core engineering principles that guide how I work:
- The "Gold-Plating" Paradox: Knowing when code is "done" is harder than writing it
- Operational Empathy: Design systems for the humans who maintain them
- Long-Term Thinking: Six years at one company taught me what job hopping never could
Each principle gets a full section with examples, context, and practical applications. The layout uses a card-hover system where engagement reveals additional visual cues, making the philosophy feel interactive rather than preachy.
Home - The Integration Point
The home page ties everything together with that expertise marquee, but also includes strategic CTAs that guide visitors to the most relevant next step based on what they're looking for.
The Technical Implementation
I built this using React and TypeScript with a focus on performance and accessibility. The key innovation isn't technical but conceptual: organizing content around expertise areas rather than project categories.
const expertisePillars = [
{
title: "Enterprise Architecture & Team Collaboration",
proof: "In my current role, I work with cross-functional teams...",
impact: "Technical Expertise & Business Impact",
tooling: ["Node.js", "TypeScript", "Cross-functional Work"],
measurableOutcome: "Reduced processing time, supported transaction growth"
},
// ... more pillars
];
The site architecture deliberately avoids:
- Projects Section: Intentionally absent
- Generic Hero Sections: No "I'm a developer who loves to code"
- Technology Lists: Skills are embedded in context, not displayed as badges
- Contact Forms: Direct links to LinkedIn and GitHub where conversations actually happen
The Broader Implications
This isn't just about portfolios. It's about how we think about career development in tech:
Focus on Experiences Over Achievements
Instead of collecting projects, collect experiences. Work on different types of problems, with different types of teams, in different contexts.
Develop Operational Empathy
The best engineers I know don't just write code, they understand the humans who maintain it, the business constraints that shape it, and the long-term implications of architectural decisions.
Embrace Long-Term Thinking
In today's fast-moving tech scene, there's pressure to job-hop for growth. But my six years in healthcare technology taught me lessons that shorter tenures never could. Sometimes staying and seeing the full lifecycle of your decisions is more valuable than chasing the next opportunity.
Building Your Own Experience-First Portfolio
If this resonates with you, here's how to start:
1. Audit Your Real Contributions
Look beyond code you wrote to systems you influenced, teams you helped, and processes you improved.
2. Focus on Context and Impact
For each experience, explain:
- What was the business context?
- Who did you work with?
- What was the outcome?
- What did you learn?
3. Show Your Thinking Process
Include technical writing, decision-making frameworks, or lessons learned. Show how you approach problems, not just solutions.
4. Be Honest About Collaboration
Use "we" more than "I". Show how you work with teams, handle disagreements, and contribute to collective success.
The Future of Technical Portfolios
I believe we're moving toward more authentic ways of showcasing engineering capabilities. The project-centric approach made sense when most developers were building standalone applications. But modern software engineering is collaborative, iterative, and context-dependent.
Experience-first portfolios better reflect this reality.
Try It Yourself
You don't need to rebuild your entire portfolio overnight. Start by rewriting one project description to focus on the experience:
Instead of: "Built a React dashboard with TypeScript and Material-UI"
Try: "Worked with the product team to design a clinician-facing dashboard that improved documentation efficiency by reducing click-through paths and providing contextual information at the point of care"
See the difference? The second version tells me about your collaboration skills, user empathy, and business impact.
Conclusion
After six years in the tech industry, I've learned that the most valuable engineers aren't just great coders, they're great collaborators who understand the human side of technology. An experience-first portfolio is a better way to showcase these skills.
The traditional project portfolio isn't wrong, it's just incomplete. By focusing on experiences, we can show not just what we've built, but how we think, how we collaborate, and how we grow.
And in an industry where soft skills often matter as much as technical skills, that's a much more complete picture of who we are as engineers.
What do you think about the experience-first approach? Have you tried something similar in your own portfolio? I'd love to hear your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.
Connect with me:
Top comments (0)