Why the future of AI isn't about storing more data, but about architecting "lazy" verification and subtraction.
The recent announcement detailing GitHub Copilot’s new agentic memory system is a significant milestone. We are finally moving past the era of "stateless" AI—where every session is Groundhog Day—into an era of persistent, evolving context.
But looking closely at how they built it reveals something much more interesting than just "Copilot remembers my logging conventions."
GitHub’s architectural choices validate a philosophy I’ve been advocating for: to scale agentic systems, we must stop adding management layers and start subtracting complexity.
Here is how their launch intersects with the concepts of "Scale by Subtraction," the "Oversight Loop," and the future of knowledge graphs.
The Triumph of "Scale by Subtraction"
The most critical design decision GitHub made was what they didn't build.
They explicitly rejected building a complex "offline curation service" to manage, deduplicate, and expire old memories. At GitHub’s scale, maintaining a separate "truth database" synchronized with a rapidly changing codebase would be an engineering nightmare.
Instead, they chose subtraction. They removed the dependency on central curation.
Their solution—Just-in-Time (JIT) Verification—is brilliant in its laziness. The system stores a memory with a "citation" (a pointer to specific lines of code). It doesn't worry if that memory goes stale five minutes later. It only checks if the memory is true at the exact moment an agent needs to use it, by "reading" the cited code in real-time.
If the code changed, the memory is dropped. The system is self-healing because it relies on the only source of truth that matters: the current state of the code.
This is a perfect execution of Scale by Subtraction. They subtracted the need for complex state management and pushed the responsibility to the edge—to the agent’s runtime action.
Evolving JIT Verification into an "Oversight Loop"
GitHub’s current JIT verification solves the immediate problem of "stale code citations." It answers the question: "Do these lines of code still exist?"
But as these systems mature, we need to answer a harder question: "Does this memory still mean what we think it means?"
This is where the concept of the Oversight Loop becomes essential. A codebase might change in a way where the citation still technically exists, but the semantic context around it has shifted completely.
The next phase of agentic memory isn’t just verifying syntax; it’s verifying semantics. We need agents equipped with Oversight Loops that can audit their retrieved memories against the broader intent of the system before taking action. JIT verification is the foundation; semantic oversight is the structure we build on top of it.
The Backend Reality: From Flat Lists to Knowledge Graphs
Right now, these memories are relatively flat JSON structures containing facts and citations. This works for individual repositories.
But as we look toward the backend infrastructure powering ecosystems like Microsoft AI, flat memory structures won't scale across domains.
When you have thousands of agents generating millions of memories across security, coding, and infrastructure, a flat list becomes noisy. You need relationships. You need to know that a memory about "Authentication Protocols" in Repo A is functionally related to a memory about "Database Access" in Repo B.
This is why the work we are doing on backend Knowledge Graphs is the necessary substrate for the future of agentic memory. We are building the relational fabric that will allow these flat, JIT-verified memories to connect, providing a truly holistic view of an organization's digital reality.
The End Goal: The "Mute Agent"
Ultimately, why does this matter?
It matters because it facilitates the shift from chatty AI assistants to capable AI personnel.
GitHub’s example of a coding agent automatically updating multiple files to keep an API version synchronized—without needing to be told—is the goal. This is the "Mute Agent": an agent that understands context deeply enough to take correct action silently, rather than constantly asking for clarification.
Memory isn't just a database of past conversations. It is the mechanism that turns context into autonomous action.
Top comments (0)