App launch time is your first impression.
If your app takes more than 2–3 seconds to open, users notice. If it takes 5+, they leave.
We recently faced this exact problem on one of our production iOS apps. Cold launch time was hovering around 4.8–5.2 seconds on mid-range devices. Crash rates were fine. UI was polished. But retention was dropping.
The culprit?
Slow startup performance
After a focused optimization sprint, we reduced launch time by 60% (down to ~2 seconds).
Here’s exactly how we did it — step by step.
Step 1 — Measure Before You Optimize
Never guess. Measure.
We used:
- Xcode Instruments → Time Profiler
- App Launch Metric (Xcode Organizer)
- DYLD_PRINT_STATISTICS
- Custom logging for did Finish Launching
Baseline numbers
Metric Before
Cold launch 5.1s
Warm launch 2.7s
Main thread blocked 3.4s
Insight
Most of the time was spent before first frame render — meaning startup work was blocking the main thread.
Step 2 — Find What Blocks the Main Thread
Problems we discovered:
- Heavy dependency injection at launch
- Database migration during startup
- Synchronous network calls
- Large storyboard initialization
- Too many dynamic frameworks
All happening before the first screen.
Classic mistake.
Optimizations That Gave Us 60% Improvement
Let’s break down what actually worked.
1. Defer Non-Critical Work (Biggest Win)
Previously:
func application(_ application: UIApplication,
didFinishLaunchingWithOptions launchOptions: ...) -> Bool {
setupAnalytics()
migrateDatabase()
preloadImages()
fetchRemoteConfig()
}
Everything blocking startup ❌
After:
DispatchQueue.global(qos: .background).async {
self.setupAnalytics()
self.migrateDatabase()
self.preloadImages()
self.fetchRemoteConfig()
}
Or even better:
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 1)
Result
Saved ~1.8 seconds immediately
2. Lazy Load Dependencies
We were initializing everything at launch:
let networkManager = NetworkManager()
let cacheManager = CacheManager()
let analytics = Analytics()
Instead, switched to:
lazy var networkManager = NetworkManager()
Why?
If the user never hits that feature, we never pay the cost.
Result
Saved ~400ms
3. Reduce Storyboard Complexity
Our initial storyboard had:
- 20+ view controllers
- embedded navigation
- heavy auto-layout
- custom fonts loading
Fix
We:
- Split storyboard
- Used lightweight launch screen
- Moved heavy views to programmatic UI
Result
Saved ~300–500ms
4. Optimize Dynamic Frameworks
Each dynamic framework increases launch time due to:
- dyld linking
- symbol resolution
We had 18 frameworks
Actions
- Merged small frameworks
- Converted some to static libraries
- Removed unused pods
Result
Saved ~700ms
5. Move Database Migration Off Startup
This one hurt.
We were migrating SQLite on every launch.
Fix
- Run only if schema version changed
- Perform after first screen
- Use background queue
Result
Saved ~600ms
6. Image & Asset Optimization
Found:
- Large PNGs
- unnecessary @3x assets
- images preloaded on launch
Fix
- Convert to WebP/HEIF
- Load on demand
- Remove preloading
Result
Saved ~200–300ms
Final Metrics
Metric Before After
Cold launch 5.1s 2.0s
Warm launch 2.7s 1.1s
Main thread blocked 3.4s 0.9s
Total improvement: ~60% faster launch
Key Lessons Learned
If you remember only these, you’ll be fine:
Do
- Defer everything non-critical
- Lazy load dependencies
- Measure with Instruments
- Minimize dynamic frameworks
- Keep launch screen lightweight
Don’t
- Call APIs on startup
- Migrate DB on main thread
- Initialize all services eagerly
- Load heavy storyboards
- Block main thread
Quick Startup Optimization Checklist
Use this in your next project:
- Use lightweight launch screen
- Lazy load services
- Remove unnecessary frameworks
- Defer analytics
- Background DB work
- Avoid heavy DI containers at launch
- Profile with Instruments
Final Thoughts
Launch time directly impacts:
- Retention
- Ratings
- Perceived quality
- Conversions
Users judge your app in seconds — literally.
Treat startup performance as a feature, not a technical afterthought.
By focusing on smart deferring, lazy loading, and removing startup bloat, we achieved a 60% improvement without changing core features.
Top comments (0)