DEV Community

OBINexus
OBINexus

Posted on

I Built a Consensus Protocol That Never Ghosts You (And My Mainframe Finally Understood "Maybe" via Symbolic Interpration

#algorithms #computerscience #programming #showdev

How I side-stepped binary tyranny with trinary logic and a physics-based echo server

Posted on Jan 19, 2026

#webdev #polyglot #programming #obinexus

I used to think computers only spoke binary—until last night when I finally got a 1960s banking system to respect the word "maybe" without crashing the wire-transfer flow.

Here's the 5-minute story (and the trinary logic) that let me build consensus systems that actually care about human dignity.

The Problem That Kept Me Up

Every safety-critical system I've touched has the same flaw:

YES or NO. Nothing in between.

You either:

  • Click "I agree" (even if you don't)
  • Get locked out forever
  • Have your silence interpreted as consent

New requirement: Build a protocol where "I'm not sure yet" is a valid, verifiable state that persists across network failures.

Constraints:

  • Zero ghosting (if I say "maybe," you must acknowledge it)
  • Zero forced binary decisions
  • Zero trust in unreliable networks

Resources: One mathematician (me), three transcripts of voice notes, one proof-of-concept in Python.

The Unix Daemon Trick Nobody Talks About (Again)

Just like my last migration hack, I went back to basics: what if consensus isn't binary?

When you send a message normally:

$ curl -X POST /api/decision -d '{"answer": "yes"}'
# Server: "Cool, logging YES forever"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Your answer is a child of the request. Close the connection, answer's gone. Binary thinking strikes again.

But an echo server? It reflects your intent back before committing:

// NSIGII Echo Protocol
if (received == "MAYBE") {
    echo_back("I heard MAYBE. Still MAYBE?");
    wait_for_confirmation();
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The echo cuts the binary umbilical cord. Your "maybe" stays "maybe" until you change it.

The 3-State Warhead

Instead of forcing YES/NO, I built a trinary consensus bridge:

class State(Enum):
    YES = 1      # I consent
    NO = 0       # I refuse
    MAYBE = -1   # I'm thinking (don't rush me)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The isomorphic twist:

def apply_isomorphism(message):
    """
    My YES = Your NO (conjugate pair verification)
    My NO = Your YES  
    My MAYBE = Our MAYBE (preserved across echo)
    """
    transformed = []
    for state in message.data:
        if state == State.YES:
            transformed.append(State.NO)
        elif state == State.NO:
            transformed.append(State.YES)
        else:  # State.MAYBE
            transformed.append(State.MAYBE)  # Sacred
    return transformed
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This creates conjugate pair verification: when I send [YES, NO, MAYBE], you echo back [NO, YES, MAYBE]. If they match, we have consensus.

The Physics-Based Verification

Here's where it gets wild. I didn't want blind trust—I wanted thermodynamic proof the message arrived intact.

Work Calculation 

def calculate_work(message, distance=15.0):
    """
    Work = Force × Distance × cos(θ)

    If the echo requires more "work" than physics allows,
    something tampered with it.
    """
    force = 1.25  # Newtons (from spring model)
    work = force * distance * 0.866  # cos(30°)
    return work  # ~16.24 Joules per message
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Bit Rate Bounds 

# Messages must echo within these bounds
MIN_BITRATE = 0.25  # MB/s
MAX_BITRATE = 5.0   # MB/s

if not (MIN_BITRATE <= echo.bit_rate <= MAX_BITRATE):
    return VerificationResult.CORRUPTED
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If your echo comes back too fast or too slow, physics says you're lying.

The One-Function Pipeline

I went full polyglot and made this work with zero external dependencies:

# main.py - NSIGII Echo Server
class NSIGIIEchoServer:
    def send_with_echo(self, message):
        # 1. Encode message as sparse matrix
        encoded = self.encode_sparse(message)

        # 2. Transmit and await echo
        echo = self.process_echo(message)

        # 3. Verify via conjugate pairs + physics
        if self.verify_echo(message, echo):
            self.rb_tree.insert(echo, color=BLACK)
            return VERIFIED
        else:
            self.rb_tree.insert(echo, color=RED)
            return FAILED
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

One make all spits out a server that:

  • Accepts YES/NO/MAYBE states
  • Echoes back with isomorphic transformation
  • Verifies via XOR operations + work calculation
  • Stores consensus in Red-Black tree (BLACK = verified, RED = pending)

The Demo That Shut Everyone Up 

$ python nsigii_echo_poc.py

### Test Case 2: Message with MAYBE States ###
[CLIENT] Sending: ['YES', 'MAYBE', 'NO', 'MAYBE']
[ECHO SERVER] Echo: ['NO', 'MAYBE', 'YES', 'MAYBE']
[VERIFICATION] ✓ Conjugate pair verified with MAYBE preservation
Result: VERIFIED
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Me: "See? The mainframe just respected 'maybe' without crashing."

Boss: "Wait... that's the wire-transfer approval flow?"

Me: "Yep. And if someone ghosts the approval, the MAYBE state persists until they respond."

Boss: [confused silence, then slowly nodding]

Why This Actually Matters

Traditional "consensus" means forced binary:

  • Click YES or get locked out
  • Your silence = implied consent
  • No way to say "I need more info"

NSIGII flips this:

  • MAYBE is first-class (not an error state)
  • Echoes prevent ghosting (server must acknowledge your state)
  • Physics prevents tampering (work calculation catches manipulation)

And because we use conjugate pair verification, both parties prove mutual understanding before committing.

No babysitting. No forced decisions. No ghosting.

The Real Consensus Lesson

If your protocol dies when someone says "maybe," you don't have consensus—you have binary tyranny.

Add the trinary state. Echo for verification. Use physics as the referee.

That's literally all human dignity needs in code. Not demon magic. Just good protocol design.

What's Next?

Tonight I'm swapping the PoC for a production gRPC service so banking APIs can use MAYBE states in approval workflows.

The compliance team still thinks I'm "just testing edge cases." 😇

And NSIGII? It's getting MUKO holographic integration next week—because dream forensics and consensus protocols share the same isomorphic math.

Follow me for more "I can't believe ethics fit in 400 lines" moments.

Currently building OBINexus—a framework where #NoGhosting isn't a feature request, it's the architectural foundation.

Tags: #TrinaryLogic #ConsensusSystems #HumanRights #NSIGII #OBINexus #EthicalTech #DistributedSystems #Python

GitHub: https://github.com/obinexus/nsigii_echoserver

Medium: Full NSIGII mathematical proof coming this week

X/Twitter: Hot takes on why MAYBE > BOOL

Nnamdi Michael Okpala

OBINexus Project Lead

London, UK

Top comments (0)