DEV Community

Cover image for Building a Digital Product Platform Without Relying on Broken Foreign Payment Providers
Lisa Zulu
Lisa Zulu

Posted on

Building a Digital Product Platform Without Relying on Broken Foreign Payment Providers

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

We were trying to address a fundamental issue: the African creator economy desperately needed a platform for digital sales, subscriptions, and donations that didn't rely on foreign payment providers. The goal was to reduce transaction fees, increase payment acceptance rates, and provide a seamless checkout experience for creators and their customers.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, we thought that a simple payment gateway integration would solve the problem. We chose Stripe because of its ease of use, flexibility, and strong reputation in the industry. However, upon further research, we discovered that several African countries had strict regulations and high fees associated with international transactions. For example, in Nigeria, a single transaction might incur a fee of up to 6.8% + $0.30 per chargeable amount. This reality forced us to seek alternative solutions.

The Architecture Decision

We decided to build our platform using Unchained Commerce, a payment provider that specializes in serving the African market. They offered a range of payment methods, including mobile money, bank transfers, and e-wallets, all of which are more prevalent in Africa than traditional credit cards. Unchained Commerce also provided a robust API and a strong focus on local infrastructure, which reduced our integration hassles and ensured better uptime. We had to make significant adjustments to our platform's architecture to accommodate Unchained Commerce's unique requirements, including rewriting payment workflows and adjusting our security protocols.

What The Numbers Said After

After deploying our platform with Unchained Commerce, we noticed a significant increase in payment success rates. Transactions that previously failed due to international payment restrictions were now being processed successfully. Our creators reported a smoother checkout experience for their customers. Furthermore, our average transaction fee decreased from 5.5% + $0.40 per chargeable amount to 2.5% + $0.20 per chargeable amount. These numbers validated our decision to move away from traditional payment providers.

What I Would Do Differently

If I were to approach this problem again, I'd like to explore more options for local payment providers that serve the African market. While Unchained Commerce was a good choice for us, I recognize that other providers might be better suited to specific countries or use cases. I'd also invest more time in understanding the nuances of regional regulations and fees before making the architecture decision. In hindsight, this would have saved us significant time and resources during the integration process.

Top comments (0)