DEV Community

Cover image for Most Nutrition APIs Hide 80% of the Data Behind Paywalls. Mine Doesn't.
Raviteja Nekkalapu
Raviteja Nekkalapu

Posted on

Most Nutrition APIs Hide 80% of the Data Behind Paywalls. Mine Doesn't.

Most give you the "big 4" (calories, protein, carbs, fat) and lock everything else. Need Vitamin B12 for your vegan meal planner? That's $50/month. Want iron content for a women's health app? Pay up.

The "Bait and Switch" I Kept Seeing

API Free Tier Nutrients To Get All Nutrients
Nutritionix 5 $449/month
Edamam 8 $79/month
Spoonacular 12 $99/month
CalorieNinjas 7 Claims all, misses 15+
Nutrition Tracker API 30+ Still free

I'm not exaggerating. Go check any of these APIs and look at their free tier response. Count the nutrients. I'll wait.

Why I Made This Decision

When I built the Nutrition Tracker API, I had a choice:

Option A: Follow the industry playbook

  • Give just enough data to be useful
  • Gate micronutrients behind paid tiers
  • Maximize conversion to paid plans

Option B: Give developers what they actually need

  • All 30+ nutrients from USDA
  • Even in free tier (yes, really)
  • Compete on speed and reliability instead

I chose B. Here's why:

1. Micronutrients Matter for Many Apps

Building a:

  • Vegan/vegetarian app? You need B12, iron, zinc
  • Women's health app? Folate, calcium, iron are essential
  • Sports nutrition app? Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, magnesium)
  • Senior care app? Vitamin D, calcium, B vitamins

Hiding these behind paywalls means only well-funded apps get to build complete solutions.

2. The Data Already Exists

The USDA provides this data for FREE. Why should I charge you extra to access it? The value I provide is:

  • Natural language parsing
  • Built on a globally distributed edge network for minimal latency worldwide
  • Clean, validated data
  • Global Redundancy - Your requests are routed to the nearest healthy data center.
  • Actually accurate fat breakdowns (see my previous post)

3. I'd Rather Win on Merit

If my API is genuinely better maintained, faster, and more accurate - that's worth paying for at scale. I don't need to artificially limit the free tier.

What You Actually Get (Free Tier)

POST /v1/calculate/natural
{
  "text": "100g spinach"
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Response includes:

{
  "totalNutrients": {
    "Energy": { "value": 23, "unit": "kcal" },
    "Protein": { "value": 2.86, "unit": "g" },
    "Fat": { "value": 0.39, "unit": "g" },
    "Carbohydrate, by difference": { "value": 3.63, "unit": "g" },
    "Fiber, total dietary": { "value": 2.2, "unit": "g" },
    "Sugars, total": { "value": 0.42, "unit": "g" },
    "Calcium, Ca": { "value": 99, "unit": "mg" },
    "Iron, Fe": { "value": 2.71, "unit": "mg" },
    "Magnesium, Mg": { "value": 79, "unit": "mg" },
    "Phosphorus, P": { "value": 49, "unit": "mg" },
    "Potassium, K": { "value": 558, "unit": "mg" },
    "Sodium, Na": { "value": 79, "unit": "mg" },
    "Zinc, Zn": { "value": 0.53, "unit": "mg" },
    "Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid": { "value": 28.1, "unit": "mg" },
    "Vitamin A, IU": { "value": 9377, "unit": "IU" },
    "Vitamin A, RAE": { "value": 469, "unit": "µg" },
    "Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol)": { "value": 2.03, "unit": "mg" },
    "Vitamin K (phylloquinone)": { "value": 482.9, "unit": "µg" },
    "Thiamin": { "value": 0.078, "unit": "mg" },
    "Riboflavin": { "value": 0.189, "unit": "mg" },
    "Niacin": { "value": 0.724, "unit": "mg" },
    "Vitamin B-6": { "value": 0.195, "unit": "mg" },
    "Folate, total": { "value": 194, "unit": "µg" },
    "Vitamin B-12": { "value": 0, "unit": "µg" },
    "Choline, total": { "value": 19.3, "unit": "mg" },
    "Selenium, Se": { "value": 1, "unit": "µg" },
    "Copper, Cu": { "value": 0.13, "unit": "mg" },
    "Manganese, Mn": { "value": 0.897, "unit": "mg" }
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

30+ nutrients. In the free tier. Every single request.

The Math That Convinced Me

Scenario: You're building a diet app and need full vitamin data.

With other APIs:

  • Free tier: Missing vitamin K, B12, folate, selenium
  • Upgrade to get them: $79/month minimum
  • Your hobby project now costs $948/year
  • Most people give up

With Nutrition Tracker API:

  • Free tier: All 30+ nutrients included
  • Build your MVP at $0
  • Only pay if you scale past free limits
  • More apps get built

I'd rather have 1000 developers building cool things for free than 10 paying $79/month.

Try It Yourself

curl -X POST "https://nutrition-tracker-api.p.rapidapi.com/v1/calculate/natural" \
  -H "X-RapidAPI-Key: YOUR_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"text": "1 banana and 2 tablespoons peanut butter"}'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Count the nutrients in the response. Compare to any competitor.

Should You Pay for the Paid Tier?

Honestly? Here's when it makes sense:

  • Processing 3+ items per request (free = 2 items max)
  • Need priority support
  • Higher rate limits for production

The paid tier isn't about unlocking nutrients. It's about scale and support.


Links:

Building something with complete nutrient data? I'd love to hear about it in the comments.


This is part of a series about building the Nutrition Tracker API. Previously: Why Your Nutrition App's Data Might Be Wrong and Build a Beautiful Meal Tracker

Top comments (0)