At the outset of any new software project, front-end developers face a critical decision: should we construct the user interface from the ground up to achieve maximum control, or should we utilize a pre-built component library to accelerate the development timeline? For a recent project, the path forward was evident. Our team was tasked with delivering a smallscale application under a tight deadline, where the primary objectives were development speed, interface consistency, and a frictionless workflow, rather than a fully customized, bespoke design.
Decisions
This context guided our evaluation of various UI libraries. A key stakeholder was our UX/UI designer, who had several firm requirements. Chief among them was the availability of a comprehensive Figma kit, either official or community-driven. This was a critical prerequisite, as it would establish a single source of truth, bridge the gap between design and engineering, and spare us the significant effort of building a design system from scratch. The ability for the designer to customize components to align with our brand identity was equally important. Moreover, native support for a dark theme and a foundational commitment to accessibility were considered essential features.
From a technical standpoint, my criteria as the front-end developer were just as stringent. The ideal library had to be lightweight to ensure optimal performance, architected to minimize bundle size, and supported by an active and helpful community. Our evaluation process led us to three final contenders: Material UI (MUI), Ant Design, and Mantine.
The Great UI Library Debate
Our analysis commenced with Material UI (MUI). As one of the most established libraries in the ecosystem, its feature-rich nature and our team's prior experience with it were significant advantages. However, a critical issue emerged during our assessment of its Figma integration. The free version of the official MUI Figma kit proved to be highly restrictive, permitting customization for only a limited set of components. This limitation would have compelled our designer to detach instances from the main library to apply custom styles, thereby severing the connection to the design system and reintroducing the very inconsistencies we aimed to eliminate. This effectively nullified the benefit of using a unified system.
Subsequently, we evaluated Ant Design. While it is an undeniably powerful and extensive library, previous experience raised concerns regarding its suitability for our project. The documentation had, at times, proven difficult to navigate due to language barriers, with some sections available only in Chinese. This posed a potential risk to development velocity, especially during troubleshooting. Furthermore, we assessed that its commitment to accessibility, although improving, was not as deeply integrated into its core architecture compared to more contemporary alternatives.
Why Mantine Came Out on Top
Ultimately, we selected Mantine, and its performance throughout the project affirmed it was the correct decision. It not only met our initial requirements but exceeded them in several crucial areas.
1. Seamless Integration Between Design and Development
Mantine's most compelling advantage was its exceptional support for Figma. We discovered a robust and meticulously maintained community Figma kit that precisely mirrored the library's React components. This synergy established a seamless workflow, enabling our designer to construct layouts using variants and properties that directly corresponded to the props used in the codebase. This one-to-one mapping eliminated ambiguity, guaranteed high-fidelity implementation, and resulted in the most efficient design-to-code handoff process I have encountered.
2. Performance First: Lightweight and Optimized
A developer must always remain mindful of the application's final bundle size, and Mantine is architected with performance as a primary concern. While the library is impressively lightweight, its most significant performance feature is its inherent support for tree-shaking. This is a dead-code elimination technique employed by modern JavaScript bundlers, such as Vite or Webpack. The bundler analyzes the import statements throughout the application and excludes any code from the final bundle that has not been explicitly imported. Because Mantine is designed to be tree-shakeable, an import statement like import { Button, Paper } from '@mantine/core' ensures that only the code for the Button and Paper components is included in the production build. All other unused components are effectively pruned, leading to a substantially smaller bundle size and, consequently, a faster application for the end-user.
3. A Truly Modular and Flexible Ecosystem
Unlike monolithic libraries, Mantine is designed as a collection of independent packages. This modular architecture is a key strength, as it allows developers to install only the functionality they require. Our project began with @mantine/core for the fundamental components. As the application's requirements evolved, we selectively integrated additional packages:
@mantine/hooks for a fantastic collection of utility hooks.
@mantine/notifications for a simple and elegant notification system.
@mantine/modals to manage our dialogs and confirmation popups.
@mantine/form for robust and easy-to-use form state management.
This à la carte approach ensures the project is not burdened with the code for unused features, such as a rich text editor or a date picker, thereby maintaining a lean and manageable dependency tree.
4. More Than Just Components: A Powerful Hooks Library
The @mantine/hooks package warrants special mention. It provides a comprehensive suite of well-tested, production-ready hooks that address common challenges in front-end development. Utilities such as useDebouncedValue for optimizing search inputs, useClickOutside for managing the dismissal of overlay elements, and useMediaQuery for implementing responsive logic saved us a considerable amount of development time. This demonstrates that Mantine's value proposition extends beyond mere UI elements to encompass a genuine enhancement of the overall developer experience.
5. Accessibility and Dark Mode as Core Principles
Mantine treats accessibility as a fundamental principle, not a secondary consideration. Its components are engineered to adhere to WAI-ARIA standards, guaranteeing full keyboard navigability and correct interpretation by screen readers. Focus management is handled intelligently out of the box; for example, components like modals and menus correctly trap focus to guide the user. This foundational commitment to accessibility provided a significant advantage in our efforts to build an inclusive application.
Similarly, the implementation of a dark theme was remarkably straightforward. By simply wrapping our application in the MantineProvider, we could toggle the color scheme via a single prop. Every component then automatically adapted to a polished and consistent dark theme, obviating the need for extensive custom CSS.
5. Flexible and Powerful Styling
Mantine achieves an excellent balance in its styling methodology. By default, components utilize CSS Modules, which inherently scope class names to prevent collisions and ensure style encapsulation—a crucial feature for large-scale applications. In addition to this, Mantine offers theme-aware style props (e.g., p, m, bg, c) for rapid, inline modifications that reference the project's central theme. For instance, p="md" will apply the precise padding value designated as md in the theme configuration. This hybrid system provides the best of both worlds: the robustness and maintainability of CSS Modules for foundational styling, combined with the convenience of utility props for layout adjustments and minor stylistic changes. The theming system itself is highly intuitive, simplifying the process of defining global brand colors, typography, and spacing.
7. Rapid Prototyping with Mantine UI
While @mantine/core provides the building blocks, Mantine UI provides the finished structures. This is a collection of over 100 responsive components and page sections—like headers, hero sections, feature grids, and footers—that are ready to be dropped into an application. We used these extensively to quickly build out standard pages, which allowed us to focus our energy on the more unique, data-driven features of our application.
8. A Thriving Ecosystem of Extensions
Beyond the official packages, Mantine's power is amplified by a thriving ecosystem of community-driven extensions. The Mantine Extensions Hub serves as a central showcase for these third-party libraries, which provide specialized functionality that can be seamlessly integrated into any Mantine project. This allows developers to extend the core library's capabilities without having to build complex components from scratch. During our project, we explored several extensions that solved specific needs, including powerful data tables, onboarding tours for user guidance, resizable split panes for complex layouts, and feature-rich scheduling components. This vibrant community and its contributions demonstrate the library's flexibility and underscore its status as a comprehensive and adaptable solution.
Final Thoughts
In the highly competitive landscape of UI libraries, Mantine achieves a remarkable and uncommon balance. It offers the development velocity and convenience expected of a mature component library, but without compromising on performance, flexibility, or the overall developer experience. For our team, it successfully bridged the critical gap between design and engineering, satisfied all our technical prerequisites, and ultimately enabled us to deliver a superior product more efficiently. It has since become our default selection for new React projects, and I recommend it without reservation.
Top comments (0)