Marian Ignev for SashiDo.io

Posted on Jan 31

AI Software Development: Vibe Coding Works Until You Need a Backend

#ai #softwaredevelopment #backend #webdev

AI software development is starting to feel like something you can talk into existence. You describe a screen in plain English, your AI code generator spits out a polished UI, and suddenly you are “creating an app” at a pace that used to require a small team.

The shift is real. Better coding models, longer context windows, and agent-style workflows mean you can keep a whole feature in the model’s working memory while you iterate. Anthropic’s public write-up on expanding context windows is a good example of why this matters in practice. When the model can keep more of your codebase and requirements in view, it stops “forgetting the earlier decision” every few prompts and starts behaving like a teammate with continuity. See Anthropic’s 100K context windows announcement.

But there is a pattern we see every week. The vibe-coded frontend gets to 80% fast, then the last 20% turns into the real work: user accounts, data modeling, permissions, background tasks, realtime, file uploads, push notifications, and the uncomfortable question, “Where does this run and what will it cost if people actually show up?”

That gap is where most “build an app for free” momentum dies. Not because the builder cannot code, but because backend complexity is not about syntax. It is about state, security, reliability, and cost control.

If you are at the point where your AI code fixer can repair a broken component but you still cannot share a stable demo with users or investors, you are not alone. The fix is not another prompt. The fix is a backend plan.

A simple next step that keeps momentum is to connect the UI to a managed backend early, before you are forced into a rushed migration. You can start a 10-day free trial on SashiDo - Backend for Modern Builders and give your vibe-coded UI real auth and data in minutes.

The Real “Phase Shift” Is Programming in Intent, Not in Syntax

What is changing is not that software is becoming magically easy. It is that the interface to software is moving from “write code” to “express intent.” In practice, that looks like:

You describe what should happen, you review what the tool produced, you correct the edge cases, and you keep moving. That is why “talk to an AI” works so well for frontend. A UI is visible, testable, and forgiving. If the spacing is wrong, you see it immediately.

Backend work is different. You often do not notice a bug until:

You have real users, real concurrency, and real retries. Something fails quietly. A job runs twice. A permission rule is too broad. A request spike increases your bill. A file upload works locally but fails behind a CDN.

This is where AI-assisted development still needs a human pattern library. Not because models cannot write backend code, but because the shape of backend risk is not obvious when you are moving fast.

To see where the market is going, it is worth reading product-level announcements from the major platforms building coding agents. OpenAI’s description of Codex as a cloud-based software engineering agent captures the direction: multi-step tasks, parallel work, and longer-running workflows that look less like autocomplete and more like delegation. See OpenAI’s Introducing Codex.

Where Vibe Coding Breaks: Five Backend Moments You Can Predict

If you have built more than one prototype, you can almost forecast the “backend wall” by week.

1) You Need Real Authentication, Not Just a Login Screen

A vibe-coded UI can give you a gorgeous sign-in form. It cannot, by itself, give you secure sessions, password resets, email verification, social login, and access control.

This is also where “low coding” gets confusing. The code is not the hard part. The hard part is choosing the correct defaults so you do not ship a security footgun.

In real products, you will need to answer questions like: What is the permission model for user data? Which roles can update which fields? How do you revoke access tokens? How do you support Google or GitHub sign-in without reinventing an OAuth implementation?

2) Your App Needs a Data Model That Survives Prompt Iteration

Early on, you store everything in local state and maybe a JSON file. The moment a second user joins, you need a database and a consistent schema strategy.

AI code generator tools can create CRUD endpoints quickly, but you still need to decide what is authoritative. Is the backend the source of truth? Are you doing optimistic updates? What happens when a user edits the same object on two devices?

MongoDB remains a common choice for prototypes that evolve fast because it fits document-shaped product data. MongoDB’s own docs on CRUD operations are a helpful baseline for understanding the primitives you are relying on when you “just add a database.” See MongoDB CRUD operations documentation.

3) Realtime Stops Being a Feature and Becomes a System Constraint

Realtime is seductive in a demo: shared cursors, live dashboards, collaborative checklists, multiplayer interactions, “agent status” updates streaming to the UI.

Realtime is also where naive backend setups break. Once you add WebSockets, you have to think about connection limits, message fan-out, and what happens when clients reconnect and replay events.

If you want the canonical reference for what your browser and server are negotiating, it is still the WebSocket spec. See RFC 6455: The WebSocket Protocol.

4) Background Work Shows Up the Moment You Send Emails or Run AI Tasks

As soon as you do anything asynchronous, you need jobs. That can be sending welcome emails, generating a report, cleaning up expired sessions, or running an embedding pipeline.

The failure mode here is not “job fails.” It is job runs twice. It is job runs late. It is job retries and creates duplicate side effects.

5) The Prototype Gets Shared, and Cost Becomes the New Bug

A lot of “free ai code generator” tooling feels free until you have requests, storage, or model usage at scale. When the prototype gets attention, the limiting factor is rarely your ability to code. It is your ability to keep the service stable and the bill predictable.

This is where you need to stop thinking in “features” and start thinking in “units.” Requests, background jobs, data transfer, storage, and compute.

A Practical Shipping Checklist for AI-Assisted Apps

When you are moving fast, it helps to treat backend work as a short checklist you can validate before you share the app.

First, define your minimum backend surface area. For most indie products, that is authentication, a database, and a small set of server-side functions for the pieces you do not trust the client to do.

Second, decide where files live. If your app handles avatars, user uploads, or generated media, you want an object store with a CDN rather than serving files from your web server.

Third, decide how you will handle “work that should happen later.” Even one background job system is better than trying to do everything in request-response.

Fourth, make sure you have a plan for realtime. If realtime is core to your product, build it early so you discover the constraints early.

Finally, decide how you will observe failures. If you cannot see errors, you will debug through user complaints.

This is the point where many makers realize that “build an app for free” was never about spending zero dollars. It was about spending predictably and not spending time on DevOps.

Where a Managed Backend Fits in Vibe-Coded Workflows

Here is the general principle: AI helps you create code faster, but it does not remove operational responsibility. Something still has to run in production. It has to store data safely, enforce permissions, scale under spikes, and keep working while you sleep.

A managed backend makes sense when:

You have a frontend you can ship today, but the backend would take you weeks to build safely. You want to move from demo to production without hiring backend expertise. You want costs that track usage, not surprises that show up after virality.

A managed backend is not the right fit when:

You need deep infrastructure customization, you require a bespoke compliance setup that demands full-stack control, or your product already has a mature backend team that wants to own every layer.

For the vibe-coder-solo-founder-indie-hacker profile, the usual goal is simpler. You want to validate a product idea with real users quickly, then decide later whether you outgrow the managed stack.

How We Close the Backend Gap at SashiDo

Once the concept is clear, it is easier to map it to implementation. With SashiDo - Backend for Modern Builders, we focus on the backend pieces that consistently block AI-first builders from shipping.

Every app comes with a MongoDB database and a CRUD API, which means you can persist data without standing up a database server, writing boilerplate endpoints, or learning a full DevOps stack just to store user objects. This matters when your AI code generator free workflow has already produced UI screens. What you need next is a stable data layer those screens can call.

Authentication is the other early bottleneck. We include a full user management system so you are not stitching together auth providers, sessions, and password flows by hand. Social login is part of that experience. You can enable providers like Google, Facebook, GitHub, Microsoft, GitLab, and others without turning identity into your weekend project.

Files become “real” the first time you let users upload anything. We integrate an AWS S3 object store with a built-in CDN so you can store and serve content at scale. If you want the deeper mechanics and why CDN-backed file delivery matters for performance, our write-up on the architecture is a good companion. See Announcing MicroCDN for SashiDo Files.

Then there is the glue. Serverless functions for the logic you cannot trust to the client, jobs for scheduled and recurring tasks, realtime state sync over WebSockets, and push notifications when you need retention. These are not “nice-to-haves” once you have users. They are the difference between a demo and a product.

If you are cost-sensitive, anchor decisions to the units you can measure. Our pricing page is where we keep the current numbers, including the 10-day free trial with no credit card required. That is also the right place to sanity-check how requests, storage, and background jobs map to your MVP.

When you do hit performance ceilings, scaling should not require a platform migration. Our engines feature is designed for that moment, when you need more compute or a different profile without rewriting your app. See Power Up with SashiDo’s Engine Feature.

The Trade-Offs: Speed Versus Control, and When to Revisit the Architecture

A good rule is to revisit your backend architecture when one of these becomes true:

Your data model has stabilized, and you are spending more time fighting earlier shortcuts than shipping. Your traffic profile is no longer spiky and unpredictable, and you want more control over cost optimization. Your compliance requirements require dedicated environments, isolated networking, or custom audit controls.

Until then, the highest-leverage move is usually to standardize on a backend that solves the basics well and lets you focus on product iteration.

This is also where we see an advantage for AI-assisted teams. When your UI and feature iteration is fast, your backend needs to be boring. Not fragile. Not bespoke. Boring infrastructure is what makes fast iteration safe.

If you want a simple mental model, think in layers:

The AI tool is your accelerator for code creation and refactoring. It is a strong ai code fixer when something breaks, and it can help you express ideas quickly.

The backend platform is your accelerator for production constraints: auth, persistence, realtime, background work, file delivery, monitoring.

When those two accelerators are aligned, you spend your weekend building product, not debugging infrastructure.

What to Do This Weekend: From Vibe-Coded UI to a Shareable Demo

If you have a working UI today, the fastest path to a demo that survives real users is usually:

Start by listing the three actions your app must support: sign up, create an object, and see that object on another device. That set forces you to implement auth, database persistence, and at least a basic sync pattern.

Next, decide what must be server-side. Anything involving secrets, role-based permissions, payments, or scheduled processing should not live in the client. Push that into serverless functions.

Then add one operational safeguard. Either basic monitoring, or a simple retry-safe job for the first background task you need. The goal is not perfection. The goal is to avoid the most common production failures that kill momentum.

If you want step-by-step implementation help, our Getting Started Guide and the developer docs are designed to be followed in the same mindset as vibe coding: small steps, quick feedback, and a working result.

Conclusion: AI Software Development Still Needs a Backend You Can Trust

The best vibe-coding experiences feel like you are collapsing time. You are expressing intent. The tool is writing the plumbing. You are iterating in minutes.

The part that has not changed is that real products need durable state, secure access, predictable cost, and operational safety. That is why AI software development is not just about generating code. It is about choosing the right production defaults early, before “it works on my machine” turns into “it broke for users.”

If you want to turn a vibe-coded prototype into something you can confidently share, you can explore SashiDo - Backend for Modern Builders. We deploy a production-ready backend in minutes, so you can add auth, MongoDB-backed APIs, files, jobs, realtime, and push notifications without doing DevOps.

FAQs

What Is Vibe Coding in Practice?

It is using natural-language prompts to generate and modify code, then steering the output through quick feedback loops. It works especially well when the result is visible and easy to test, like UI and simple workflows.

Why Do AI-Generated Apps Get Stuck at the Backend?

Backend work has invisible failure modes: permissions, concurrency, retries, and cost. These issues often only show up with real users, so they require stronger defaults than a quick prototype.

When Should I Add Authentication to a Prototype?

As soon as you have data that should not be public or you want to track per-user state. Adding auth early also forces you to define access control, which prevents painful rewrites later.

Do I Need Realtime for My MVP?

Only if collaboration, live dashboards, or instant state sync is core to the value. If realtime is central, build it early so you discover connection and scaling constraints before launch.

How Do I Keep Costs Predictable When My Prototype Gets Attention?

Track measurable units like requests, storage, and data transfer, then choose infrastructure where those units are transparent. Avoid designs that create unbounded fan-out or background work without limits.

DEV Community