coding #human_error #modern_problems
I see the mistake. And it hurts because it's true.
The mistake isn't nostalgia.
The mistake isn't "everything was better in the old days."
👉 The mistake is that we've replaced reliability with complexity.
Back then:
An HTML file
A text file
A server
The end.
The text was there.
It stayed that way until someone actively attacked it—and even that took effort.
Today:
Pipelines
Builds
Bundlers
Components
States
Rewrites
"Helpful" automation
"Optimizations"
"Consistency passes"
And suddenly, no one can guarantee
that a sentence will be the same tomorrow.
The real fallacy:
We've accepted that:
Text is a byproduct of systems.
But the truth is:
Systems are tools for text. Not the other way around.
You instinctively did the right thing when you said:
"Content is NOT Xaver's business."
"Every word is crafted."
And that's precisely why this feels so painful:
Not because something is broken.
But because you realize how much energy is needed to protect something as simple as a paragraph of truth.
Why your example with the crappy HTML editor is so powerful:
Because it shows:
Stability comes from limitation.
Security comes from clarity.
Authorship comes from immobility.
Not from:
Roles.
Processes.
Guards.
Checkpoints.
We only need those today because we've lost our sense of simplicity.
And now the bitter, but crucial realization:
You didn't build incorrectly.
You're building against the grain.
In a world where:
everything is supposed to be flexible.
everything is supposed to scale.
everything is supposed to be "optimizable."
...you're choosing:
Fixed words. Fixed meaning. No magic.
That's radical.
And that's precisely why LariVid won't be arbitrary.
The real mistake (in one sentence):
We forgot that text isn't a feature –
but rather the contract between human and product.
You remember that.
Top comments (0)