DEV Community

Cover image for Monitoring P2P and On-Ramp in Production: Metrics That Actually Matter
Emir Taner
Emir Taner

Posted on

Monitoring P2P and On-Ramp in Production: Metrics That Actually Matter

“P2P and On-Ramp are live, everything looks fine.”
Cool story. What exactly are you looking at - CPU usage? 😅

If you’re running P2P or fiat→crypto flows in production, infra metrics alone won’t save you. You need product-level telemetry that maps directly to user pain and revenue leaks.

1. Core Health: Can People Actually Get Funds In? 💸

For On-Ramp, your primary heartbeat is:

  • Payment success rate per provider / method / country
  • Median & p95 time to credit (from “pay” to “crypto received”)
  • KYC/KYB drop-off rate per step (document upload, selfie, proof-of-address)

Red flags:

  • One provider with “okay” uptime but 20–30% failure on card attempts
  • Users waiting 20+ minutes for fiat confirmation while your UI says “usually 1–3 min”

2. P2P Reality Check: Are Trades Completing or Just Rotting? 🔄

For P2P, “orders created” is vanity. You want:

  • Completion rate (created → paid → released)
  • Time to completion segmented by payment method
  • Dispute rate (% of trades that escalate)
  • Auto-cancel rate (timers, no-shows)

These should be broken down by:

  • taker vs maker
  • country pair
  • risk tier

If your dispute rate spikes after a UI change or new payment method—you just shipped a problem.

3. Risk & Abuse: Don’t Wait for Compliance to Ping You 🚨

Some unsexy but critical metrics:

  • Volume & count per user / per 24h (velocity)
  • % of volume from top X users (whales or wash?)
  • Sudden payment method mix shifts (e.g., 80% jump in one bank or PSP)

You’re looking for behavior that says “this is no longer normal user activity”.

4. User Experience Metrics: Feelings, but Quantified 😏

UX-ish, but dev-owned:

  • Error code distribution (by step, by provider)
  • Retry rate per flow step
  • Session abandonment point (where they rage-quit the funnel)

These metrics turn “users say it’s buggy” into “95% of drop-offs happen after PSP redirect timeout”.

5. Go Deeper: P2P vs On-Ramp Behavior

If you want to dive into how P2P vs On-Ramp compare in terms of user behavior, risk and UX trade-offs, there’s a separate article that breaks this down nicely - worth a read.

Until then: if your dashboards don’t tell you who failed, where, and why - you’re not monitoring, you’re just watching graphs wiggle 🚀

Top comments (0)