๐งฉ The Problem: AI Development Is in Chaos
Over the last two years, AI has become the most powerful coding tool ever created.
But it also introduced a new category of problems that traditional architectures were never meant to handle:
- โ Generated code is unstable (drift)
- โ Small changes break unrelated modules
- โ Multi-agent workflows conflict
- โ Regeneration overwrites human logic
This is no longer a tooling issue.
Itโs a systemic architectural problem โ and systemic problems require architectural solutions.
๐ง The Origin: Why We Needed ASA
Across multiple AI-driven projects, the same destructive pattern kept appearing:
- AI could generate code
- ...but couldnโt preserve architecture
- Small spec changes broke unrelated modules
- Agents overwrote each otherโs logic
Eventually it became undeniable:
We cannot build AI-generated software on architectures designed before AI existed.
That realization led to the creation of ASA โ the AI-Sliced Architecture.
๐ What Is ASA?
ASA introduces vertical slices, deterministic scaffolding, and regeneration safety.
It ensures:
- AI cannot break the architecture.
- Developers can iterate safely.
- Only deterministic scaffold regions regenerate.
- Human-written logic stays intact.
ASA transforms AI development from "creative chaos" into deterministic engineering.
๐ ASA Slice Structure (v1.0)
A slice contains everything needed for a single feature: handler, service logic, schemas, repository, contract, spec, and tests.
src/
โโโ domains/
โโโ auth/
โโโ slices/
โโโ login/
โโโ __init__.py
โโโ handler.py # AI-managed entry point
โโโ repository.py # Data layer
โโโ schemas.py # Pydantic models (I/O)
โโโ service.py # Human-written logic (Protected ๐)
โโโ slice.contract.json # Generated from slice spec
โโโ slice.spec.md # Human-written slice definition
โโโ tests/ # Deterministic test scaffold
`
This structure is deterministic, stable, and regeneration-safe.
๐ The โSandwich Patternโ: AI Code Around Human Logic
ASA enforces a strict separation between AI-generated and human-written regions.
Example (service.py):
`python
src/domains/auth/slices/login/service.py
โ THIS FILE IS SAFELISTED.
AI regenerates scaffolding around it, but never touches this logic.
def login_user(ctx: LoginContext):
if not ctx.user_exists:
raise UserNotFound()
return {"token": generate_token(ctx.user)}
`
Your logic is never overwritten, even when you regenerate the slice 50 times.
โก Why Traditional Architectures Struggle in the AI Era
Clean Architecture, DDD, and Hexagonal Architecture were created for a world where:
- Humans wrote 100% of the code
- Refactoring was manual
- Boundaries were conventions
- Regeneration didnโt exist
In modern AI workflows, regeneration happens daily and AI frequently violates invisible boundaries.
ASA doesnโt replace Clean Architecture โ it stabilizes it and makes it safe for AI.
๐ The 3 ASA Gamechangers
01 // Regeneration Without Destruction
Update the spec โ ASA regenerates only deterministic regions.
Your custom logic stays untouched.
02 // The Boundary Guardian
ASA blocks cross-slice imports, domain leaks, and architecture drift.
AI agents can no longer "accidentally" break the system.
03 // Structural Determinism
Same input โ same output.
No hallucinated folders, no random files.
ASA behaves like a compiler, not a creative assistant.
๐งช Try ASA in Practice (8-Minute Demo)
Live demo: vibecodiq.com/demo/
`bash
1. Define a slice
mkdir -p domains/auth/slices/login_demo
2. Generate contract
asa generate-contract auth/login_demo
3. Generate skeleton
asa generate-skeleton auth/login_demo
4. Regenerate safely
asa regenerate-slice auth/login_demo
`
๐ฎ Whatโs Next?
This is Part 1 of the ASA series.
Coming next:
- The Boundary Guardian โ AST-Backed Enforcement
- Zero-Hallucination Scaffolding
- Safe Multi-Agent Workflows
Follow me here or on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/voldan/ to join the discussion.
Top comments (0)