DEV Community

Cover image for 🦀📏 RustSpanLang — The Experimental Borrow-Checker Syntax Playground
Pʀᴀɴᴀᴠ
Pʀᴀɴᴀᴠ

Posted on

🦀📏 RustSpanLang — The Experimental Borrow-Checker Syntax Playground

What is RustSpanLang?

RustSpanLang (unofficial name) refers to an early experimental mini-language and internal parsing mode used during Rust’s development to test macro expansion, span tracking, and borrow-checking rules. It was never intended as a user-facing language, but it behaved like a restricted form of Rust focused almost entirely on analyzing references, ownership semantics, and lifetime propagation.

Instead of full Rust syntax, RustSpanLang operated more like a structural testbed — meant to verify how the compiler treated spans, names, scopes, and regions before the final borrow-checking model evolved into what modern Rust uses today.

To outsiders, it felt like a strange Rust dialect with barely any features — similar to a debugging overlay, grammar harness, and language sandbox all in one.


Specs

Language Type: Compiler-internal syntax mode / experimental dialect

Origin: Early Rust compiler development (pre-1.0 era)

Purpose: Testing borrow-checking, macro spans, and compiler behavior

Typing: Static with strict ownership rules

Execution Model: Compiler feedback and validation, not runtime execution


Example Code (Hello World)

RustSpanLang was not meant for real execution, but conceptually, a minimal example might resemble:

let s = &"Hello Span!";
borrow(s);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

or a more explicit lifetime surface test:

&'a mut x -> &'b y
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

These forms weren't runnable programs — they existed to provoke compiler responses.


How It Works

  • RustSpanLang focused on ownership mechanics, not computation.
  • It validated whether:
    • A reference could outlive its source
    • A mutable borrow overlapped with another borrow
    • A span was preserved across macro expansion
  • Simplified grammar stripped away:
    • Traits
    • Type inference
    • Modules
    • Optimization
    • Most expressions

Effectively, RustSpanLang behaved like a mechanical stress-test for Rust’s core philosophy: safety through strict lifetime control.


Strengths

  • Extremely valuable for designing Rust’s borrow-checker.
  • Helped expose edge cases in macro hygiene and code generation.
  • Provided a controlled environment for testing compiler assumptions.
  • Influenced how the final Rust ownership model was shaped.

Weaknesses

  • Not publicly documented or intended for developers.
  • No runtime, tooling, or real ecosystem.
  • Syntax changed frequently and inconsistently.
  • Exists mostly as historical compiler archaeology.

Where to Run

You cannot run RustSpanLang today in any conventional way. Its remnants live in:

  • Rust compiler source history
  • Early RFC notes and design threads
  • Prototype borrow-checker test harness files
  • Compiler debug modes dealing with spans and hygiene

Some fragments appear in nightly test suites as commented cases.


Should You Learn It?

For normal Rust development: No

For language design historians or compiler enthusiasts: Maybe

For borrow-checker theory deep dive: Potentially useful

For writing actual software: Impossible


Summary

RustSpanLang was an internal experimental language mode used during Rust’s early development as a laboratory for testing spans, macros, and ownership behavior. It never became a user language, but its influence shaped one of Rust’s strongest features: memory safety without garbage collection. Today, it survives only as a fragment of compiler history — a tool that helped turn Rust’s ownership system from theory into reality.

Top comments (0)