DEV Community

Cover image for Intro to Playwright & Cypress: Choosing the Right Tool
WallTech
WallTech

Posted on

Intro to Playwright & Cypress: Choosing the Right Tool

#qa #cypress #playwright #automationtesting

If you’ve been following our QA series, you already know how much power lies in understanding the DOM, locators, and selectors.
Now let’s move from theory to practice - to the frameworks that make all that knowledge come alive: Playwright and Cypress.

Both are modern, fast, and open-source. They share the same goal - making web automation reliable - but they take very different roads to get there.

Playwright: Power and Flexibility

Playwright was designed with scalability in mind.
It’s not just another testing library - it’s a full-blown automation platform that lets you test web, mobile, and API layers under one roof.

Key things to love:

  • Multi-browser and cross-platform support (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
  • Works with multiple languages: TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, C#
  • Excellent integration with CI/CD tools
  • Handles both UI and API testing in the same flow

Of course, the learning curve is a bit steeper, and debugging can feel less visual than in Cypress.
But once set up, Playwright runs fast, stable, and parallelized - perfect for large QA ecosystems.

Playwright Documentation

Cypress: Simplicity and Developer Focus

Cypress takes a more visual, front-end–centric approach.
It’s the favorite tool of many UI-focused teams who want immediate feedback, real-time test reloading, and built-in reporting.

Why teams love it:

  • Visual dashboard with time travel debugging
  • Auto-screenshots and video recording for each run
  • Tight integration with front-end frameworks like React, Vue, Angular

Still, it’s more limited when you go beyond browser testing and no true mobile or multi-language support.

Cypress Documentation

Code in Action

Now, let’s look at how both tools handle the same simple login test.
Even with identical goals, their style and flow tell different stories.

Playwright (TypeScript)

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('Login flow', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('https://example.com/login');
  await page.fill('#username', 'tester');
  await page.fill('#password', '12345');
  await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
  await expect(page).toHaveURL(/dashboard/);
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Cypress (JavaScript)

describe('Login flow', () => {
  it('logs in successfully', () => {
    cy.visit('https://example.com/login');
    cy.get('#username').type('tester');
    cy.get('#password').type('12345');
    cy.get('button[type="submit"]').click();
    cy.url().should('include', 'dashboard');
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Both frameworks give clean, readable syntax - but Playwright feels like a toolkit for scale, while Cypress feels like a playground for experimentation.

Choosing What Fits You

If your product requires broad coverage, API integrations, and multi-environment testing, go for Playwright.
But if your focus is on UI validation, fast feedback, or developer-friendly debugging, Cypress will make your life much easier.

Follow our social media profiles so you don’t miss new updates: LinkedIn | Dev.to | Medium | Walltech

Top comments (0)