PM here, curious how others handle this.
Scenario that happens constantly:
- We document requirements thoroughly
- Engineering builds it
- Three months later, we need to modify something
- Nobody remembers why certain decisions were made
- Engineering has to reverse-engineer the "why" before changing anything
The problem isn't the documentation. We have docs. The problem is the documentation doesn't capture the discussions, debates, and trade-offs that happened during the build.
When I ask "why is it built this way?", the answer is often "let me check Slack" or "I think we discussed this in a meeting but not sure which one."
Is this just an accepted cost of product development? Or is there a process that keeps this context alive?
Not asking about specific tools - more interested in processes, rituals, or habits that work.
Top comments (0)