Do you ever feel like your company’s digital systems are just... broken? ⛓️💥
It’s a common feeling among executives today. On the surface, the dashboards look fine. The presentations are shiny. But underneath, there’s a sense of chaos. Every time you try to launch a new feature or integrate a new AI tool, something else snaps. You’re spending more time fixing old problems than building new solutions.
If you’re feeling clueless or frustrated by your digital roadmap, I want to offer a comparison that might change how you view your entire organization.
Have you ever experienced severe turbulence during a flight? 💺
If you’re sitting in the back of the plane, it’s a nightmare. You’re gripping the armrests, watching the overhead bins rattle, and wondering if the plane was built to handle this. From the passenger's seat, turbulence looks like a crisis. It looks scary.
But if you could step into the cockpit, you’d see a completely different scene. To a veteran pilot, that same turbulence is just "a Tuesday." It’s the aerial equivalent of speed bumps on a road. They don’t panic because they trust two things: the systems they’ve built** and **the processes they follow.
The problem in business today is that too many leaders are flying through "AI storms" with a crew that has never actually been in a cockpit. They’ve hired people who know the theory of flight but have never landed a plane in a crosswind.
The result isn't just a bumpy ride—it’s Digital Turbulence. And as we move into 2026, where AI is no longer a luxury but a requirement, this turbulence can ground your company for good.
Why Your AI Strategy Feels Like a "Broken" Flight
When things feel broken in your tech stack, it’s rarely because of the code itself. It’s almost always a people problem. In the rush to "do something with AI," many organizations make hiring decisions based on speed, hype, or cost. They look for the quickest way to get a chatbot on their homepage. On paper, it looks like a great deal before takeoff. The budget is low, the timeline is short, and everyone is excited. 💰🤑
But reality shows up at 30,000 feet.
When your AI starts hallucinating, when your customer data leaks, or when your system crashes because more than five people used it at once, you realize you didn't buy a solution—you bought a liability.
If you want to focus on your journey—growing revenue and staying ahead of the curve—you need to stop being a passenger in your own technology. You need to put the right people in the right seats.
To get there, you must avoid these top five hiring mistakes.
1. Choosing the “Least Priced” Agency
This is the most frequent mistake I see. You have three quotes on your desk. Two are for $150,000, and one is for $35,000. They all use the same buzzwords. They all promise a "custom AI roadmap."
It is incredibly tempting to take the $35,000 option. But in high-level engineering, there is no such thing as a "discount."
Low-priced agencies often survive by using "cookie-cutter" code. They aren't building a system that fits your specific business context. Instead, they are slapping a basic interface on top of a generic AI model and calling it a day.
The Real Cost of "Cheap"
When you hire based on price alone, you aren't just buying software; you are buying Tech Debt. The Maintenance Trap: The code is often so poorly documented that when the agency leaves, no one else can fix it.
- The Security Gap: Cheap builds almost never prioritize data privacy. In 2026, one data leak can result in millions in fines and a ruined reputation.
- The "Shelf-Life" Problem: Because it wasn't built to scale, the system will likely need to be completely rebuilt from scratch within 12 months.
A professional "pilot" knows that the cheapest parts are the ones that fail during a storm. If you want a system that survives the turbulence, you have to invest in the engineering.
2. Hiring "Talkers" instead of "Builders"
The AI space is currently flooded with "experts" who have never actually shipped a production-grade product. They can give a brilliant PowerPoint presentation on the "Future of Generative AI," but they can’t explain how to secure an API or manage data latency.
How to Spot a Talker
Talkers focus on the "Magic." They talk about how AI will "revolutionize" your business without explaining the actual steps to get there. They avoid the "boring" stuff—things like:
- Data Sanitation: How do we make sure the AI isn't learning from bad data?
- Observability: How do we know why the AI made a specific mistake?
- Infrastructure: How do we keep the system running 24/7?
If you hire someone who speaks more than they work, you are putting a passenger in the pilot’s seat. They look great in the uniform, but they’ll be the first to panic when the alarms go off.
3. Chasing "Magic" Cross-Skilled Unicorns
Many leaders try to find one person who can do everything. They want an engineer who is also a data scientist, a project manager, and a business strategist.
While "cross-skilled" people are valuable, trying to find one "Rockstar" to build your entire AI ecosystem is a recipe for burnout and failure.
AI integration in 2026 is complex. It requires specialized seats:
- The Architect: To build the "Universe" (the MCP servers and data connections).
- The Security Lead: To protect your company’s intellectual property.
- The Product Lead: To make sure the AI actually helps your customers.
When you try to find one person to do it all, you end up with a mess of half-finished ideas. You don't need a wizard; you need a professional crew where everyone knows their role.
4. Relying on "Part-Time" Accountability
This is the mistake of the "fractional" era. Companies hire high-level consultants to give them a roadmap, but they don't have anyone on the ground to actually drive the bus.
The Accountability Gap
AI systems are not "set it and forget it" tools. They are living systems that require constant monitoring.
- What happens when a new update to a protocol like Model Context Protocol (MCP) breaks your current integrations?
- Who is responsible when the AI starts giving incorrect pricing to your top-tier clients on a Sunday morning?
If your expert is a part-timer with ten other clients, you are not their priority. They aren't there to handle the turbulence; they are just there to send you a report after the plane has already landed. You need people with "skin in the game."
5. Trusting People Who Ignore the "Foundation"
A common sign of a "broken" system is when a company tries to build fancy AI agents on top of messy, unorganized data.
Many engineers will tell you they can build a "Cinematic Universe" of AI agents for you in a week. But if they haven't asked to see your data architecture first, they are lying.
The "Garbage In, Garbage Out" Rule
In 2026, the best starting point for any organization is building MCP (Model Context Protocol) Servers. This is the "Universal USB Port" for your data.
- If your team is trying to build chatbots without first organizing your data into MCP servers, they are building a house on sand.
- If they aren't talking about Google’s UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol) for your e-commerce needs, they aren't looking at the full roadmap.
Professional pilots don't just jump in and fly; they spend hours on the pre-flight checklist. Your tech team should do the same.
The Reality: Turbulence is Normal for Experts
The reason you feel "clueless" or "broken" is likely because you’re looking at the problems from the passenger seat.
When you have the right people in the right seats, the "turbulence" doesn't stop, but it stops being scary.
- Security threats? The team has a protocol for that.
- Scaling issues? The architecture was built to handle it.
- New AI updates? They’ve already integrated them into the roadmap.
They take care of the "speed bumps" so you can focus on the destination.
The Audit: Is Your Crew Ready?
Take a look at your current AI roadmap. Ask yourself:
- Did we hire the best people, or the cheapest people?
- Do our systems talk to each other (Shared Context), or are they isolated islands?
- Do we have anyone who is truly accountable when things go wrong?
Conclusion
Technology is an investment, not a cost center. If you treat it like a "discount flight," you’re going to have a rough ride.
But if you invest in the right people—qualified engineers who understand the Universal Protocols of 2026—you’ll find that the turbulence is just part of the journey.
Put the right people in the right seats. Let them handle the cockpit so you can focus on where the company is headed. ✈️
Are you ready to stop fighting the systems and start leading the journey?
Top comments (0)