DEV Community

Cover image for Where are we bleeding time, quality, or consistency in UI development?
Aman kumar
Aman kumar

Posted on

Where are we bleeding time, quality, or consistency in UI development?

💭 As a UI Developer with 5 years of experience, I’d ask:
"Where are we bleeding time, quality, or consistency in UI development?"
I took this seriously—and here’s what I discovered.👇

🔧 1. Inconsistent UI Across Products

The Problem:
Multiple teams build UI in isolation, leading to fragmented design, duplicated code, and brand inconsistency.

The Fix:

  • Build a Design System using tools like:

    • 🧩 Radix UI for accessible, unstyled base components.
    • 🎨 Tailwind CSS + Tailwind Config for consistent spacing, color tokens.
    • 📚 Storybook to document and demo components.
  • Standardize on shared tokens: spacing, typography, color palettes, z-index layers, etc.

  • Version the design system and publish it via npm or Turborepo packages.


🔁 2. Rewriting Forms, Tables, and Modals

The Problem:
Teams waste time reinventing basic UI patterns with different behaviors, validations, and structure.

The Fix:

  • Abstract reusable components:

    • FormBuilder using React Hook Form + Zod for validation schemas.
    • ModalWrapper with animation, focus trap, close handling.
    • PaginatedTable with props for columns, filters, sorting.
  • Expose hooks to control logic: useModalForm(), usePaginatedTable(), etc.

  • Save dozens of hours per feature by reusing patterns across apps.


🔌 3. Vendor-Coupled UI Components

The Problem:
UI logic directly depends on 3rd-party service APIs (Stripe, WebRTC, Firebase), making switching or testing harder.

The Fix:

  • Use Adapter Pattern to wrap 3rd-party SDKs:
  interface PaymentService {
    createCheckoutSession(data: SessionData): Promise<void>;
  }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • UI components only talk to the adapter, not the SDK.
  • Makes the UI service-agnostic, testable with mocks, and future-proof if you switch providers.

🧠 4. Unclear State Management Practices

The Problem:
Mixing multiple libraries with no guidelines (Context API, Zustand, Redux, React Query) causes overfetching, prop drilling, or tightly coupled components.

The Fix:

  • Create a state management architecture doc:

    • Local UI state → use useState, useReducer
    • Async server state → use React Query
    • Global client state → use Zustand or Context API with clear boundaries
  • Use selectors to prevent unnecessary re-renders.

  • Co-locate state where possible; promote a minimal global state principle.


⚡ 5. UI Performance Bottlenecks

The Problem:
Large data tables, charts, dropdowns, or forms cause poor load time and re-renders.

The Fix:

  • Use react-window or react-virtual for list virtualization.
  • Memoize expensive components using React.memo and useMemo.
  • Apply code-splitting using React.lazy, Suspense.
  • Profile with React DevTools Profiler and browser performance tab.
  • Lazy load third-party scripts (e.g., analytics, chat widgets).

✅ 6. Low Test Coverage for UI Logic

The Problem:
Without tests, small UI changes break major flows. Manual QA becomes expensive and unreliable.

The Fix:

  • Use React Testing Library to write unit tests for reusable components:

    • Button behavior, form validation, conditional UI
  • Use Cypress for E2E flows:

    • Login, payment, dashboard filtering, etc.
  • Mock API responses with MSW (Mock Service Worker).

  • Add coverage reports with vitest or jest + GitHub checks.


🧩 7. Slow or Broken Design-to-Dev Handoff

The Problem:
Figma files are unclear, lack spacing/variants/tokens. Developers guess values or wait for clarification.

The Fix:

  • Enforce a "Ready for Dev" checklist:

    • Defined spacing, variants, interactions, tokens.
    • Annotated Figma components.
  • Use Figma Tokens plugin to sync spacing/colors directly into Tailwind config.

  • Build a design system playground in Storybook to preview components in dev environments.


🚀 Final Thoughts

Fixing these UI challenges doesn’t just improve code. It:

  • Saves 💸 by avoiding rework
  • Boosts ⚡ speed by enabling reuse
  • Elevates 🧠 team maturity and scalability

This thought exercise helped me think beyond just features—to systems, developer experience, and long-term velocity.

If you’re a frontend engineer → ask yourself:
"What if I owned this product?"
Your mindset will evolve. Guaranteed. 💡


#frontendengineering #uidesign #saas #reactjs #scalableui #designsystems #productthinking #uiarchitecture #webdevelopment #softwareengineering #productivity #techleadership #reusablecomponents


Top comments (0)