Intro:
As Microsoft expands the Copilot ecosystem, organizations now have two distinct experiences to build conversational agents:
- Copilot Studio Full Experience (Power Platform-based)
- Copilot Studio Lite (Agent Lite) While both aim to democratize AI-driven productivity, their intended use cases, governance models, and extensibility differ significantly. This article explores the decision tree for selecting the right experience and provides a high-level comparison to guide architects and CoE teams.
Why This Matters:
Choosing the wrong experience can lead to:
- Over-engineering for simple departmental needs
- Compliance risks when sharing Lite agents without proper assessment
- Missed automation opportunities if Lite is used for enterprise workflows
When to Use Lite vs Full:
| Feature | Lite Experience | Full Experience |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | Microsoft 365 | Power Platform |
| Storage | Cosmos DB (MS managed) | Dataverse (customer managed) |
| Triggers & Actions | None | Power Automate flows |
| ALM & DLP | Not supported | Supported |
| Governance | M365 Admin Center | Power Platform Admin Center |
| Intended Use | Personal productivity, departmental knowledge | Enterprise automation & compliance |
What does it mean ??
Lite Experience:
- If shared departmentally, ensure credit allocation strategy is in place for non-licensed users.
- Track usage in Microsoft 365 Admin Center (MAC) for Lite agents.
Full Experience:
- Managed in Power Platform Admin Center (PPAC).
Credits can be pooled and allocated per environment for broader governance.
Empathize: Understand user needs—personal vs enterprise workflows.
Define: Scope and compliance requirements upfront.
Ideate: Use Lite for quick departmental knowledge agents; Full for automation-heavy scenarios.
Prototype & Test: Start small with Lite, scale to Full when governance or complexity demands.
Top comments (0)