Every few months, a new wave of AI panic hits dev Slack:
“Is Copilot going to replace us?”
“Will a tiny team with AI out‑ship our whole org?”
“Do we still need this many engineers?”
From what we see working with engineering teams at BetterEngineer, here’s the pattern: AI doesn’t replace good engineers. It multiplies them.
It just makes it painfully obvious who was coasting.
- Give AI to someone who understands users, product, and the system → they move faster, break less, and ship better outcomes.
- Give it to someone who only cares about closing tickets → you get more code, more tech debt, and more risk.
So the real question isn’t “Will AI replace devs?” It’s: “Am I becoming an AI‑ready engineer, or just a faster code typist?”
What an AI‑Ready Engineer Actually Looks Like
Boiling it down, the engineers who are thriving with AI tend to:
1. Care about the product, not just the code
They ask:
- What problem does this feature actually solve?
- Is there a simpler way to deliver the same value?
- How will we know if this worked?
They use AI to explore options and speed up experiments, not as an excuse to overbuild.
2. Know AI’s strengths and limits
They’re clear on:
- Good fits: boilerplate, exploration, refactors, suggestions
- Bad fits: nuanced domain logic, tricky edge cases, security‑sensitive code
- Red flags: hallucinations, hidden dependencies, leaking internal code into prompts
They don’t push “AI everywhere.” They pick their spots.
3. Think in systems, not snippets
Instead of just “write me function X,” they think:
- Where does this belong in our architecture?
- What does this do to performance, reliability, deploy risk?
- What happens at 100k users, not 100?
AI helps them move faster, but they still own the design.
4. Review, test, and own AI output
They treat AI like a junior dev:
- Good at drafts, sometimes wrong, always needs review
- They refactor, test, and document
- They’re willing to stand behind the code as if they wrote it line‑by‑line
What This Means for You (and Your Team)
For individual devs:
AI is here. You don’t have to love all of it, but ignoring it completely is a bad bet. The differentiator won’t be “who can prompt best,” it’ll be who can combine product sense, system thinking, and AI as leverage.
For tech leads:
Pay attention to who’s using AI responsibly vs. who’s just generating more code. Reward people who use it to reduce complexity and improve outcomes, not inflate their commit count.
If you’re a developer in LATAM (or anywhere else), this is also where we’re seeing hiring pressure shift: toward engineers who can use AI to build better products, not just engineers who can “use AI tools.”
Top comments (0)