Tracing source code of Kubernetes client-go

Whole thing is started from Ingress this feature of Kubernetes.But today I’m not going to talk too much about it, basically just I have to let Ingress Controller will send packets to our Router so that we could do the thing we want, if you are interested in our Router , you can more infos from our blog and demo by just login to play with it.

Anyway, the thing I’m going to do for this is I have to create a proxy for real kubernetes API server,and modify the real data to what we want. To do that, I have to understand how client-go( Ingress use client-go to get info, of course) send requests and what it expected. Let’s start!

NOTE: I just mention some part of codes, not explaining whole big piture

    epEventHandler := cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs{
        AddFunc: func(obj interface{}) {
            updateCh.In() <- Event{
                Type: CreateEvent,
                Obj: obj,
            }
        },
        DeleteFunc: func(obj interface{}) {
            updateCh.In() <- Event{
                Type: DeleteEvent,
                Obj: obj,
            }
        },
        UpdateFunc: func(old, cur interface{}) {
            oep := old.(*corev1.Endpoints)
            cep := cur.(*corev1.Endpoints)
            if !reflect.DeepEqual(cep.Subsets, oep.Subsets) {
                updateCh.In() <- Event{
                    Type: UpdateEvent,
                    Obj: cur,
                }
            }
        },
    }

These codes at ingress-nginx tag nginx-v0.20.0(at following context we just use this tag),file internal/ingress/controller/store/store.go line 446

The purpose is emit these callbacks into SharedInformer to get kubernetes events for updating the datas in store,to generate nginx configuration for load balancing these pods.

Ok, so where we use epEventHandler? We would see it be passed into store.informers.Endpoint atthe same function, line 519

store.informers.Endpoint.AddEventHandler(epEventHandler)

Here we should care about two things

• what is Endpoint?
• how it uses the functions sent into AddEventHandler?

Let’s keep dig into the code, we would see AddEventHandler is a method of an interface: SharedInformer, yes, we just talk about it, now we see it. SharedInformer is defined under k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/shared_informer.go(remember, here what I’m tracing is the client-go under ingress-nginx vendor, so it might outdated with latest client-go)

The only implementor of SharedInformer is sharedIndexInformer(still at same file), it’s a structure, here is the real code of AddEventHandler

func (s *sharedIndexInformer) AddEventHandler(handler ResourceEventHandler) {
    s.AddEventHandlerWithResyncPeriod(handler, s.defaultEventHandlerResyncPeriod)
}

func (s *sharedIndexInformer) AddEventHandlerWithResyncPeriod(handler ResourceEventHandler, resyncPeriod time.Duration) {
    // ignore, here would do some period syncing
    listener := newProcessListener(handler, resyncPeriod, determineResyncPeriod(resyncPeriod, s.resyncCheckPeriod), s.clock.Now(), initialBufferSize)
    // ignore, here would emit `listener` into `processer`
}

func newProcessListener(handler ResourceEventHandler, requestedResyncPeriod, resyncPeriod time.Duration, now time.Time, bufferSize int) *processorListener {
    ret := &processorListener{
        nextCh: make(chan interface{}),
        addCh: make(chan interface{}),
        handler: handler,
        pendingNotifications: *buffer.NewRingGrowing(bufferSize),
        requestedResyncPeriod: requestedResyncPeriod,
        resyncPeriod: resyncPeriod,
    }

    ret.determineNextResync(now)

    return ret
}

To here, we should stop this part, because we can’t get more from these.So I go back to how to use sharedIndexInformer

I found type of store.informers have a method Run that would be called by store,that’s mean what it call is the point we care, that’s store.informers.Endpoint

func (i *Informer) Run(stopCh chan struct{}) {
    // this is *sharedIndexInformer.Run
    go i.Endpoint.Run(stopCh)
    // ignore, all resource is working under the same way
}

func (s *sharedIndexInformer) Run(stopCh <-chan struct{}) {
    // this is last line, I ignore others codes
    s.controller.Run(stopCh)
}

Then I take a look at how controller works

// Run begins processing items, and will continue until a value is sent down stopCh.
// It's an error to call Run more than once.
// Run blocks; call via go.
func (c *controller) Run(stopCh <-chan struct{}) {
    defer utilruntime.HandleCrash()
    go func() {
        <-stopCh
        c.config.Queue.Close()
    }()
    r := NewReflector(
        c.config.ListerWatcher,
        c.config.ObjectType,
        c.config.Queue,
        c.config.FullResyncPeriod,
    )
    r.ShouldResync = c.config.ShouldResync
    r.clock = c.clock

    c.reflectorMutex.Lock()
    c.reflector = r
    c.reflectorMutex.Unlock()

    var wg wait.Group
    defer wg.Wait()

    wg.StartWithChannel(stopCh, r.Run)

    wait.Until(c.processLoop, time.Second, stopCh)
}

The point is wg.StartWithChannel(stopCh, r.Run), in reflector.Run,it call r.ListAndWatch(stopCh), and ListAndWatch is based on listWatcher

list, err := r.listerWatcher.List(options)
if err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("%s: Failed to list %v: %v", r.name, r.expectedType, err)
}

We would go back here later, let’s find out what is listerWatcher

We set store.informers.Endpoint by this store.informers.Endpoint = infFactory.Core().V1().Endpoints().Informer() atinternal/ingress/controller/store/store.go:L264

Then we see infFactory, line 257

infFactory := informers.NewSharedInformerFactoryWithOptions(client, resyncPeriod,
    informers.WithNamespace(namespace),
    informers.WithTweakListOptions(func(*metav1.ListOptions) {}))

informer:

func (f *endpointsInformer) Informer() cache.SharedIndexInformer {
    return f.factory.InformerFor(&corev1.Endpoints{}, f.defaultInformer)
}
// defaultInformer
func (f *endpointsInformer) defaultInformer(client kubernetes.Interface, resyncPeriod time.Duration) cache.SharedIndexInformer {
    return NewFilteredEndpointsInformer(client, f.namespace, resyncPeriod, cache.Indexers{cache.NamespaceIndex: cache.MetaNamespaceIndexFunc}, f.tweakListOptions)
}
// NewFilteredEndpointsInformer
func NewFilteredEndpointsInformer(client kubernetes.Interface, namespace string, resyncPeriod time.Duration, indexers cache.Indexers, tweakListOptions internalinterfaces.TweakListOptionsFunc) cache.SharedIndexInformer {
    return cache.NewSharedIndexInformer(
        &cache.ListWatch{
            ListFunc: func(options metav1.ListOptions) (runtime.Object, error) {
                if tweakListOptions != nil {
                    tweakListOptions(&options)
                }
                return client.CoreV1().Endpoints(namespace).List(options)
            },
            WatchFunc: func(options metav1.ListOptions) (watch.Interface, error) {
                if tweakListOptions != nil {
                    tweakListOptions(&options)
                }
                return client.CoreV1().Endpoints(namespace).Watch(options)
            },
        },
        &corev1.Endpoints{},
        resyncPeriod,
        indexers,
    )
}

Ha, we got ListWatch now, it would call an instance of *kubernetes.ClientSet to get the info it wanted!

Now we can back to ListAndWatch, let’s take a look at the details of it.

In fact, I’m more focused on watch API, because it’s a little bit weird.I found it’s server with keep sending data until client part close the connection.How it did it? At k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache/reflector.go:L226

    for {
        // give the stopCh a chance to stop the loop, even in case of continue statements further down on errors
        select {
        case <-stopCh:
            return nil
        default:
        }

        timeoutSeconds := int64(minWatchTimeout.Seconds() * (rand.Float64() + 1.0))
        options = metav1.ListOptions{
            ResourceVersion: resourceVersion,
            // We want to avoid situations of hanging watchers. Stop any wachers that do not
            // receive any events within the timeout window.
            TimeoutSeconds: &timeoutSeconds,
        }

        r.metrics.numberOfWatches.Inc()
        w, err := r.listerWatcher.Watch(options)
        if err != nil {
            switch err {
            case io.EOF:
                // watch closed normally
            case io.ErrUnexpectedEOF:
                glog.V(1).Infof("%s: Watch for %v closed with unexpected EOF: %v", r.name, r.expectedType, err)
            default:
                utilruntime.HandleError(fmt.Errorf("%s: Failed to watch %v: %v", r.name, r.expectedType, err))
            }
            // If this is "connection refused" error, it means that most likely apiserver is not responsive.
            // It doesn't make sense to re-list all objects because most likely we will be able to restart
            // watch where we ended.
            // If that's the case wait and resend watch request.
            if urlError, ok := err.(*url.Error); ok {
                if opError, ok := urlError.Err.(*net.OpError); ok {
                    if errno, ok := opError.Err.(syscall.Errno); ok && errno == syscall.ECONNREFUSED {
                        time.Sleep(time.Second)
                        continue
                    }
                }
            }
            return nil
        }

        if err := r.watchHandler(w, &resourceVersion, resyncerrc, stopCh); err != nil {
            if err != errorStopRequested {
                glog.Warningf("%s: watch of %v ended with: %v", r.name, r.expectedType, err)
            }
            return nil
        }
    }

Of course is an endless loop, would stop by channel or return.

The tricky part is it check error content, if it’s a probable EOF, it would keep taking data rather stop the connection.

Ok, everything seems to make sense right now, but that’s not enough, I’m very confused by why it could receiving a JSON data by such as a streaming way, so let’s go back to see client.CoreV1().Endpoints(namespace).Watch(options)

// Watch returns a watch.Interface that watches the requested endpoints.
func (c *endpoints) Watch(opts metav1.ListOptions) (watch.Interface, error) {
    opts.Watch = true
    return c.client.Get().
        Namespace(c.ns).
        Resource("endpoints").
        VersionedParams(&opts, scheme.ParameterCodec).
        Watch()
}
// Watch attempts to begin watching the requested location.
// Returns a watch.Interface, or an error.
func (r *Request) Watch() (watch.Interface, error) {
    return r.WatchWithSpecificDecoders(
        func(body io.ReadCloser) streaming.Decoder {
            framer := r.serializers.Framer.NewFrameReader(body)
            return streaming.NewDecoder(framer, r.serializers.StreamingSerializer)
        },
        r.serializers.Decoder,
    )
}

And I found the point is r.serializers, and the shit thing is it still is a function send by external code.

If you trace back then you would find it’s from *RESTClient.serializers, at k8s.io/client-go/rest/client.go, line 225 and 227 send this into NewRequest

And you found it’s created at line 108 in same file, serializers, err := createSerializers(config)

func createSerializers(config ContentConfig) (*Serializers, error) {
    // ignore, we don't care them since we just use `StreamSerializer` of `Serializers`
    if info.StreamSerializer != nil {
        s.StreamingSerializer = info.StreamSerializer.Serializer
        s.Framer = info.StreamSerializer.Framer
    }

    return s, nil
}

We would see the type of StreamSerializer is runtime.Serializer, it’s an interface, and since we are sending JSON data, so we go to the JSON one implementor of it to see it’s Decode

import (
    jsoniter "github.com/json-iterator/go"
)

After seeing that, I know the trace already done, because my question already been answered, they use github.com/json-iterator/go this library

I guess I would talk about something about how to create a kube API proxy with modifying data after completing my proxy of kube API server. (It’s really hard XD)

I guess today the most interesting thing we learned is Go *http.Response is a ReadCloser!(How Kubernetes did their watch trick)

Anyway, thanks for the read, hope these could help you more detailed understanding Kubernetes client implementation and be a little start point to read more about it.