Every Vue project begins the same way: a clean folder, a few components, a nicely organized API client, and a sense that the framework is simple enough to keep everything under control. Vue rewards beginners with an illusion of clarity. State feels easy. Reactivity feels magical. Composition API feels liberating.
And then the application grows.
More features. More requirements. More data. More stakeholders. More interactions between components that were never meant to know about each other. And slowly, almost imperceptibly, the structure begins to sag.
What used to be coherent becomes chaotic. A state variable introduced “just for now” becomes a dependency for five different screens. A composable added as a quick fix becomes foundational logic without ever being reviewed. A Pinia store turns into a dumping ground for unrelated concerns. Watchers appear like weeds. Performance issues show up in places where nothing obvious changed.
This is the story of most Vue apps that fail to scale.
Not because Vue is flawed — but because architecture was optional.
This article is about what goes wrong, why it goes wrong, and the architectural principles that turn Vue from a fast-moving prototyping tool into a platform capable of supporting large, long-lived applications.
The slide from clarity into chaos
A small Vue app is a wonderful place. Components are isolated. State is minimal. Data flows make sense. There’s almost no friction between idea and implementation.
The trouble begins the moment two things happen:
- Multiple features need the same data but use it differently.
- Components begin handling responsibilities that belong to the domain, not the UI.
Imagine a simple product listing page. You fetch products, display them, and maybe allow filtering. Everything is local. Everything feels clean.
Then other parts of the application want product data too. Some want enriched data. Some want only summaries. Some want real-time updates. Some want to write changes.
The developer does what feels natural:
// ProductList.vue (Composition API)
const products = ref<Product[]>([])
const loadProducts = async () => {
products.value = await api.getProducts()
}
Simple, efficient, harmless.
Until another view needs the same function.
Then a third one.
Then an admin dashboard.
Then a real-time trading board.
And so the team extracts a composable:
// useProducts.ts
export function useProducts() {
const products = ref<Product[]>([])
const loadProducts = async () => {
products.value = await api.getProducts()
}
return { products, loadProducts }
}
Better. But now each caller has its own isolated state. No shared ownership. No consistency. No cache.
Someone suggests “let’s put it in Pinia.”
This is where the architectural fork happens.
Pinia as a dumping ground
Many Vue apps begin to rot exactly at this moment.
Pinia becomes a giant container of global variables, rather than a domain boundary.
Developers add fields whenever they need them. Loaders. Filters. Temporary states. Flags. Untyped responses. Cached API results. UI state. Business state. Everything goes in one place because it's “easy”.
The store becomes a kitchen drawer where you shove anything you don’t want to deal with anymore.
Something like this:
// useProductStore.ts
export const useProductStore = defineStore('products', {
state: () => ({
products: [] as Product[],
isLoading: false,
error: null as string | null,
filters: {},
selectedItem: null as Product | null,
draftData: {},
// 20 more fields...
}),
actions: {
async loadProducts() { ... },
updateDraft() { ... },
select() { ... },
reset() { ... },
// 10 more actions...
}
})
This is how scaling stops.
Not dramatically. Not instantly.
Quietly.
When everything is global, nothing is meaningful.
When a store has no boundaries, responsibility dissolves.
When everything depends on everything else, refactoring becomes impossible.
The real problem: missing architecture
Vue’s strength is also its trap.
Vue doesn't force you into architecture.
You can write a 20k-line application using only components, watchers, and a few stores.
You can ship it.
You can feel productive.
Until something changes.
Until a feature interacts with five other features.
Until a new requirement contradicts an old assumption.
Until performance drops because a reactive field triggers 200 unnecessary updates.
The root cause of non-scalable Vue apps is simple:
State has no ownership.
Behavior has no boundaries.
Components do too much.
Composables are misused.
Pinia is treated as a storage box rather than a domain model.
Scaling Vue is not about more optimization — it’s about more intention.
The path forward: components become thin again
A scalable Vue app has one key property:
Components render; they don’t decide.
Bad code:
// ProductList.vue
const products = ref<Product[]>([])
const filters = ref({})
watch(filters, async () => {
products.value = await api.getProducts(filters.value)
})
Good code:
// ProductList.vue
const { products, filters, load } = useProductListController()
The component becomes a consumer of behavior, not an owner of logic.
When components stop handling business rules, they stop becoming bottlenecks.
Composables as units of behavior
A good composable doesn’t just “wrap an API call.”
It encapsulates a piece of behavior that doesn’t belong to the UI.
For example:
// useProductListController.ts
export function useProductListController() {
const store = useProductStore()
const filters = ref({})
const products = computed(() =>
store.filteredProducts(filters.value)
)
const load = () => store.loadProducts()
return { products, filters, load }
}
Now the component does nothing but display and interact.
The composable orchestrates behavior.
The store owns state.
The API layer owns communication.
Three layers.
Three responsibilities.
Zero chaos.
Reactive boundaries: the invisible architecture
Scaling Vue is impossible without understanding something subtle:
reactivity propagates unless you stop it.
The moment every state variable is free to trigger every computation, your app becomes a pinball machine.
Reactive boundaries are intentional structures that limit how far a reactive change can travel.
Example:
const raw = ref<RawProduct[]>([])
const derived = computed<Product[]>(() => convert(raw.value))
This is a boundary.
Between raw data and derived data.
Between API format and UI-ready format.
Between model and view.
Large apps survive because their reactive signals don't leak across the entire system.
Why architecture fixes scaling
When Vue apps fail to scale, teams blame the framework.
When they succeed, teams credit their architecture.
The difference is never syntax.
It's never whether you picked Options API or Composition API.
It's not even whether you use TypeScript (though you should).
The difference is always structure.
A scalable Vue architecture:
- gives every piece of state a single owner
- separates UI from behavior
- isolates domain rules from presentation
- builds reactivity intentionally, not accidentally
- limits propagation
- uses stores as domain models, not global buckets
- uses composables as behavioral units, not utility wrappers
When these principles are in place, Vue becomes astonishingly scalable.
When they’re absent, the experience feels fragile, brittle, unpredictable.
Final thought
Vue is not just a tool for small SPAs.
It can power real-time dashboards, Telegram Mini Apps, enterprise interfaces, trading terminals, and complex multi-role workflows. But only if its architectural backbone is treated seriously.
Most Vue apps don’t scale because teams don’t plan for scaling. They assume simplicity replaces structure.
But structure is what unlocks simplicity — at scale.
⭐ Want to Grow as a Senior Frontend Architect?
The architectural principles in this article don’t appear out of thin air — they come from years of building and breaking large systems. If you want to accelerate that learning curve, I strongly recommend a few Educative courses that helped me structure my own thinking:
• Grokking the System Design Interview
Perfect if you want to understand how complex systems behave and scale — even as a frontend engineer.
• Grokking the Frontend System Design Interview
A rare course that actually talks about architecture, not just frameworks.
• Hands-on Vue.js: Build a fully functional SPA
Excellent for understanding boundaries, data flow, and long-term maintainability.
If you're serious about leveling up as a Senior Vue / Frontend Architect, these courses are absolutely worth it.
And yes — these are affiliate links, but I only recommend what I personally use.
Top comments (0)