The Problem
If you're using AI coding assistants like Cursor, Windsurf, or Claude Code, you've probably seen this:
cursor --dangerously-skip-permissions
Teams skip permissions for speed. But that creates chaos:
- No audit trail - Who approved what change?
- No accountability - Did the AI follow team standards?
- No learning - Same permission questions repeat endlessly
The Solution: PermitFlow
I built PermitFlow to solve this. It's permission governance for AI coding.
Key Features
Permission Requests
- Team members request permissions for AI actions
- Clear documentation of intent
- No more guessing why changes happened
Approval Workflows
- Multi-level approval chains
- Role-based permissions
- Instant notifications
Reusable Templates
- Common permission patterns saved
- One-click approvals for standard operations
- Team learning captured
Audit Logs
- Every permission tracked
- Who requested, who approved, when, why
- Compliance-ready exports
How It Works
- Developer requests permission for AI operation
- Team lead gets notification
- Lead approves/denies with context
- Audit trail updated
- Template created for future
Pricing
- Free Tier: For solo developers and small teams
- Pro ($29/month): Unlimited team members, advanced workflows, priority support
Why This Matters
AI coding assistants are amazing for velocity. But teams need governance, not anarchy.
Every --dangerously-skip-permissions is a risk. PermitFlow turns that risk into a managed process.
Try It
Built by developers who got tired of explaining AI decisions in retrospectives.
Top comments (0)