Hiring has become one of the most unexpected and dangerous attack vectors in modern cybersecurity. As organizations adopt remote work, global talent pools, and rapidly evolving recruitment pipelines, cybercriminals have adapted quickly. Instead of breaking in through firewalls or phishing emails, attackers can now infiltrate organizations through their HR departments.
What Are These Fake Employees?
Fake worker schemes see malicious actors masquerading as legitimate employees, contractors, or vendors to gain access to organizations. These operations go beyond simple identity theft by forging identities such as AI-generated profile photos, deepfake videos, and stolen credentials. In some cases, they use laptop farms to defeat traditional geolocation controls.
Once hired, they gain legitimate credentials, access to internal systems, and the trust of colleagues, making them one of the most dangerous forms of insider threat. Unlike traditional cyberattacks, these infiltrations often go undetected for months.
One of the most notorious examples is the North Korean IT worker scheme. Since 2020, more than 300 companies have reportedly hired North Korean operatives posing as legitimate employees using stolen identities. Once inside organizations, these workers generate revenue to fund the regime’s weapons programs while also stealing sensitive intellectual property, planting backdoors, and, in some cases, using the access for extortion.
The issue extends far beyond state-sponsored hackers. A leading research firm predicts that within the next three years, as many as 25% of job candidates worldwide could be fraudulent.
The motivations behind these schemes vary. In some cases, a skilled individual impersonates the real applicant to help them pass pre-employment tests or perform convincingly during interviews. In others, candidates rely on AI tools to answer technical questions they would not normally be qualified to handle. More concerning, however, are malicious actors who seek to infiltrate company networks, deploy malware, steal sensitive intellectual property, or carry out other forms of abuse and misconduct.
Why Hiring Has Become a Major Attack Vector
Several shifts in how organizations recruit and onboard talent have unintentionally turned hiring into a highly attractive entry point for attackers.
1. Remote Work Environments
The rise of remote and hybrid work has removed many traditional, in-person verification steps. Video interviews, asynchronous assessments, and fully online onboarding make it easier for attackers to hide behind convincing digital personas. Identity checks are often limited to scanned documents, profile photos, and brief video calls that can now be easily forged using AI-generated images, deepfake video, or stolen personal data. In some cases, a single individual may interview while a different person performs the actual work once access is granted.
2. Speed Over Scrutiny
In competitive job markets, hiring teams are under constant pressure to move fast. Vacancies are costly, and delays can impact product timelines or service delivery. As a result, background checks, reference calls, and identity verification may be rushed, postponed, or applied inconsistently, especially for short-term contracts or “urgent” roles.
3. Outsourcing and Contractors
The growing reliance on third-party recruiters, staffing agencies, and offshore contractors adds multiple layers between the organization and the individual being hired. Each layer introduces gaps in accountability and visibility. Employers may assume agencies have completed proper checks, while agencies rely on documentation that may already be compromised. This fragmented oversight creates ideal conditions for fake workers to slip through undetected.
4. Trust-Based Access Models
Many organizations operate on an implicit trust model for new hires. Once someone is onboarded, they quickly receive access to internal systems, communication tools, source code repositories, or customer data so they can be productive from day one. Least-privilege access is often relaxed early on. For attackers, this is a critical opportunity, and early access can be used to plant persistence, exfiltrate data, or move laterally before suspicion arises.
How Fake Employee Operations Typically Work
Step 1: Target Selection
Attackers begin by identifying roles that offer high value but low visibility. These are typically positions that provide access to source code, internal systems, customer data, or cloud infrastructure, while operating with minimal day-to-day supervision. Fully remote and contract-based roles are especially attractive because identity verification relies almost entirely on digital signals. Software development, IT support, DevOps, and data-focused roles are common targets, as organizations often grant broad access early to enable productivity.
Step 2: Identity Construction
Once a role is selected, the attacker builds a credible professional identity. This may involve stealing the identity of a real individual using information from data breaches or public platforms, or creating a synthetic persona designed to look legitimate across multiple systems. Résumés, LinkedIn profiles, portfolios, and references are carefully crafted to align with one another.
Step 3: Interview Manipulation
During the interview phase, attackers actively manipulate the process to conceal their true identity or capabilities. Deepfake videos and AI-generated voice tools may be used to match profile photos and credentials. In more organized schemes, a skilled accomplice may conduct technical interviews, with another person later assuming the role once hired.
Step 4: Onboarding and Access
After receiving an offer, the fake employee completes standard onboarding and is issued legitimate credentials. This typically includes a corporate email address, VPN or single sign-on access, entry into source code repositories, and access to internal documentation. At this point, the attacker has crossed the most critical threshold and is operating from inside the organization’s perimeter.
What Fake Employees Do Once Inside
Once inside an organization, attackers operate under the cover of legitimacy, allowing them to pursue a range of objectives with reduced scrutiny. Their activities may include quietly exfiltrating sensitive data such as customer information, intellectual property, credentials, or trade secrets, as well as harvesting additional credentials that can be reused in future attacks or sold to other threat actors.
In cases of state-backed actors, they establish backdoors or persistence mechanisms to maintain long-term access even if the original account is later discovered. Some operations focus on espionage, monitoring internal communications, workflows, and strategic plans over time, while others aim at sabotage by introducing vulnerabilities, manipulating configurations, or inserting malicious code into production systems.
Warning Signs Organizations Often Miss
Avoidance of Live Interaction
One of the earliest red flags is a consistent reluctance to appear on live video or engage in real-time discussions. Attackers may cite camera issues, bandwidth limitations, or time zone challenges to avoid face-to-face interaction. While occasional technical problems are normal, repeated excuses or sudden failures during critical meetings, such as interviews or code reviews, can indicate an attempt to hide the true identity of the person behind the account.
Inconsistent Personal or Employment Details
Fake employees often struggle to maintain perfect consistency across conversations, documents, and platforms. Small discrepancies may appear in employment dates, previous responsibilities, certifications, or even basic personal details. These inconsistencies are easy to overlook when hiring teams are busy or distributed, but they can surface over time as the individual is asked more questions or interacts with different departments.
Unusual Location and Network Behavior
Another commonly missed signal involves network activity. Repeated use of VPNs, proxy services, or frequently changing locations can be a sign that access is being routed through laptop farms or shared infrastructure. While remote workers may legitimately use VPNs, patterns that don’t align with the employee’s stated location or working hours should prompt additional review.
Low Engagement in Team Communication
Fake employees often limit their participation in informal communication channels. They may respond only when necessary, avoid spontaneous discussions, or remain silent in team chats and meetings. This low engagement helps reduce the risk of unscripted interaction but can be misinterpreted as introversion, time zone mismatch, or focus on deep work rather than collaboration.
Mismatch Between Claimed and Actual Skills
Over time, a gap may emerge between the expertise claimed during hiring and the quality or nature of the work delivered. Tasks may be delayed, overly generic, or reliant on copying existing code or documentation without a deeper understanding. In some cases, work output may fluctuate depending on which individual is actually performing the task behind the scenes.
How Companies Can Defend Against Fake Employees
1. Make Identity Verification a Security Control
Identity checks should go beyond traditional HR validation. Layered verification techniques are essential. Live video ID checks ensure the person on the call matches submitted documents, while secure document validation, including tamper-resistant credentials or digital certificates, adds an extra layer of trust.
2. Apply Zero Trust to New Hires
Organizations should adopt a “least-privilege” or zero-trust approach for all new hires. Employees should start with minimal access, only receiving additional permissions as they demonstrate legitimate behavior, complete verification milestones, and prove competency. This limits the potential damage a fake employee can inflict and ensures that access expansion is tied to observable trust, not just a signed offer letter.
3. Monitor Behavior, Not Just Credentials
Traditional security measures often assume that once an identity is verified, the user is trustworthy. Fake employees exploit this assumption. Implementing user behavior analytics allows organizations to detect anomalies such as unusual access patterns, data downloads outside normal hours, attempts to escalate privileges, or interactions with sensitive systems inconsistent with job responsibilities. Continuous monitoring acts as an early warning system, flagging potential threats before they escalate into serious breaches.
4. Align HR, IT, and Security Teams
Hiring decisions, particularly for sensitive roles, should involve security input from the outset. HR, IT, and security teams must collaborate to establish shared criteria for background checks, access provisioning, and ongoing monitoring. This alignment ensures that hiring processes are not just fast, but also safe, and that no single department operates in isolation when evaluating potential employees. Security-focused onboarding and ongoing training can further reinforce awareness and vigilance across teams.
5. Reassess Contractor and Vendor Access
Third-party contractors, temporary workers, and vendors are often overlooked in security planning, yet they can be just as risky as full-time employees. Organizations should apply the same verification, staged access, and behavioral monitoring standards to all external hires. Access should be time-limited, role-specific, and continuously reviewed. Reassessing contractor and vendor access periodically ensures that no stale or unnecessary permissions linger, reducing the attack surface for potential fake employee operations.
Conclusion
As hiring processes become faster, remote, and increasingly reliant on digital verification, attackers have found new ways to blend in, steal data, and maintain long-term access, all while appearing legitimate. As deepfakes improve and identity fraud becomes more accessible, organizations that fail to adapt will continue to expose themselves to long-term compromises.
Read more on my blog: www.guardingpearsoftware.com!
Top comments (0)