As the Founder of ReThynk AI, I’ve learned something important:
Devs don’t need heavy “AI governance.” They need simple rules that protect trust, privacy, and quality without slowing execution.
Because without rules, AI adoption turns into chaos. And with too many rules, adoption dies.
So I use a lightweight model that actually works.
AI Governance for Devs: Simple Rules That Work
When Devs starts using AI, the first problems are predictable:
- inconsistent output quality
- people copying AI blindly
- sensitive data entering tools
- confusing “who owns what”
- mistakes that damage customer trust
Governance is simply the answer to one question:
“How do we use AI without hurting the business?”
The 7 rules I recommend (for minimum viable governance)
1) Humans own outcomes
AI can draft, suggest, and summarise.
But a human must approve anything that goes to:
- customers
- public platforms
- pricing/terms
- policies
- decisions that affect people
Rule: No “AI said so.”
2) A clear “do not share” list
Devs needs a one-page list of what never goes into AI tools:
- customer identifiers
- payment details
- contracts and confidential docs
- passwords/keys
- private complaints with names
Rule: If it’s sensitive, it stays out.
3) One workflow at a time
Adopting AI across everything is a common failure.
Rule: One workflow → one KPI → 14 days → then expand.
This keeps adoption stable and measurable.
4) A quality checklist for outputs
Without standards, AI output becomes random.
Define what “good” means for:
- support replies
- sales messages
- marketing content
- internal SOPs
Rule: If it doesn’t meet the checklist, it doesn’t ship.
5) An escalation rule for risky cases
AI should not handle high-stakes situations alone:
- angry customers
- refunds/legal issues
- medical/financial advice
- harassment/safety concerns
Rule: When uncertain or sensitive, escalate to a human.
6) A simple transparency policy
I don’t need to announce AI everywhere.
But if AI affects someone’s outcome (screening, approvals, decisions), clarity matters.
Rule: If it changes a person’s result, be transparent.
7) A learning loop
Governance isn’t control. It’s an improvement.
Every week, Devs should ask:
- what worked
- what failed
- what should be added to the checklist
- which outputs caused rework
Rule: Update the system weekly, not yearly.
The leadership insight
AI governance is not about restricting teams.
It’s about making AI safe for normal people to use inside the business.
That is democratisation in practice:
- accessible
- repeatable
- accountable
- trustworthy
Top comments (2)
Devs don't need heavy AI governance. They need simple frameworks.
This is solid. Framing governance as “minimum viable” instead of heavy policy is spot on.
Human ownership + a clear do-not-share list alone would prevent most AI misuse. Simple and practical.