DEV Community

Mahdi Shamlou | Durable Workflow Engines Comparison — Temporal, DBOS Transact, Prefect & Custom Python Engines Mahdi SHamlou

Hey everyone! Mahdi Shamlou here again 🚀

After diving into classic algorithm challenges like LeetCode #8 String to Integer (atoi), today I want to explore something a bit different — durable workflow engines in Python.

I noticed most blog posts out there are old, incomplete, or heavily biased toward one tool. So I decided to create a fresh, practical comparison and give my take on which workflow engine you should pick in 2026.

Let’s dive in.


What is a Durable Workflow Engine?

A durable workflow engine helps you run code reliably and safely, even if your app crashes, your machine restarts, or network hiccups occur. They’re particularly useful for:

  • Long-running processes (hours, days, or even months)
  • Background jobs and automation
  • Retry, compensation, and saga patterns
  • Observability & external signaling

I’ll compare four approaches:

  • Temporal — the battle-tested distributed platform
  • DBOS Transact — lightweight embedded durability in Postgres
  • Prefect 3.x — Pythonic, open-source workflow orchestration
  • Custom Python engine — pure Python + your own persistence

1. Temporal (temporalio/sdk-python)

Temporal is a production-proven, distributed workflow engine originally built at Uber (as Cadence). It’s used by DoorDash, Snap, Stripe, and others.

Mahdi Shamlou

How it works:

  • Workflows as code (functions/classes)
  • Activities separated from orchestration
  • External Temporal server handles task durability

Pros:

  • Maximum durability — even months-long workflows survive anything
  • Signals, queries, workflow versioning, child workflows
  • Multi-language support (Python, Go, Java, TS, .NET)
  • Great observability (Temporal Web UI / Cloud)

Cons:

  • Requires server/cluster → more ops complexity
  • Higher learning curve and more code

2. DBOS Transact (dbos-transact-py)

DBOS Transact is an embedded durable engine for Python backed by Postgres. Think of it as “durable Python without leaving your app.”

Mahdi Shamlou

How it works:

  • Annotate normal Python functions with @workflow and @step decorators
  • Each step automatically checkpoints its state in Postgres
  • On crash/restart, workflow resumes from last checkpoint
  • External events or signals can be sent with recv() / send() methods
  • Minimal changes to your existing code — the library handles durability

Pros:

  • Minimal code changes → easy to adopt
  • Lightweight, fast, low ops overhead
  • Great performance for embedded durability

Cons:

  • Tied to Postgres
  • Fewer advanced features than Temporal

3. Prefect (Prefect 3.x)

Prefect is a Python-first workflow orchestration framework — great for data pipelines, ML workflows, and automation tasks.

Mahdi Shamlou

How it works:

  • Define workflows with @flow and tasks with @task decorators
  • Each task execution is automatically tracked and persisted (checkpointing)
  • Flows can be suspended/resumed manually or via events
  • Result persistence allows retries, caching, and skipping already-completed tasks
  • Optional Prefect server/agent UI provides real-time observability and control

Pros:

  • Extremely Pythonic → minimal code friction
  • Excellent UI and monitoring
  • Durable execution for long-running flows
  • Open-source, hybrid execution

Cons:

  • Durability is checkpoint-based → not full deterministic replay like Temporal
  • Python-only (no multi-language support)
  • Some advanced saga patterns require manual handling

4. Pure Python Custom Engine

You could roll your own workflow engine using just Python + a DB or file store.

Mahdi Shamlou

How it works:

  • Store workflow instances in a table with workflow ID, current step, status, and data
  • Poll a queue (e.g., Redis, RQ, Celery) and execute steps based on stored state
  • Implement retry, timeout, and compensation manually
  • Signals/events handled with a custom event table or pub/sub system

Pros:

  • Full control, zero dependencies
  • Simple for very small workflows

Cons:

  • Very easy to get wrong — lost state, duplicates, race conditions
  • No UI or observability out-of-the-box
  • Maintenance grows with complexity

My Take: Which One Should You Use?

  1. Start with Prefect or DBOS Transact :
  • Prefect: Best for Python workflows, great UI, caching, event-driven automations. Durable execution with minimal overhead.
  • DBOS Transact: Ultra-lightweight, embedded durability in Postgres. Great if you want minimal footprint and existing Postgres usage.
  1. Switch to Temporal when you outgrow the lighter options
  • Need full deterministic replay, months-long workflows, multi-language, or enterprise-scale reliability.
  1. Custom Python engines are mostly for learning, experiments, or extremely simple workflows.

Want More?

If you enjoyed this deep dive into workflow engines, you might like my other article:
Subscribe to the Medium newsletter

How I Won an Algorithm Competition at University — With a Smart Trick | Mahdi Shamlou

Mahdi Shamlou

In that post, I share a clever approach that helped me solve tricky algorithm problems efficiently — a real-life example of strategy + code. 🚀

🔗 LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mahdi-shamlou-3b52b8278

📱 Telegram:
https://telegram.me/mahdi0shamlou

📸 Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/mahdi0shamlou/

Author: Mahdi Shamlou | مهدی شاملو

Top comments (0)