When you’re tracking thousands of moving objects — drivers, delivery agents, or devices — reliability matters just as much as speed.
You can’t afford to lose a single GPS ping.
That’s where QuestDB’s wal_tables() come in.
What is wal_tables()?
In QuestDB, a Write-Ahead Log (WAL) table is a durable, crash-resilient ingestion mode.
Normally, when data is inserted into a non-WAL table, QuestDB writes it directly to disk in columnar format. That’s blazing fast — but if something crashes mid-write, that data might be lost.
With WAL enabled, all incoming writes are first recorded in a write-ahead log (a transaction log). This ensures that:
- Writes are durable — no data loss even on crashes.
- Parallel ingestion is supported.
- Replication and recovery are faster.
You can list all WAL-enabled tables using:
SELECT * FROM wal_tables();
This query returns metadata about all active write-ahead log tables — perfect for monitoring ingestion health and consistency.
Example: Kafka + QuestDB for Realtime Location Tracking
Let’s imagine you’re building a location tracking service.
Each user periodically sends GPS updates to a Kafka topic named locations.
A small Kafka consumer script reads these messages and inserts them into a WAL-enabled QuestDB table.
Table Schema Example:
CREATE TABLE locations (
id INT,
latitude DOUBLE,
longitude DOUBLE,
timestamp TIMESTAMP
) timestamp(timestamp)
PARTITION BY DAY
WAL;
This single WAL; line at the end turns your table into a write-ahead log table.
Location data are now safely stored in the WAL before being committed — ensuring zero data loss, even if your ingestion script restarts or your server crashes.
Monitoring and Debugging WAL Tables
- Inspect all WAL tables and their ingestion state:
SELECT * FROM wal_tables();
This helps you confirm ingestion is live, and no logs are stuck uncommitted — a key part of real-time reliability monitoring.
- To resume suspended WAL tables:
ALTER TABLE table_name RESUME WAL;
- Check Writer Transactions, ensure
writerTxn < sequencerTxn
ALTER TABLE table_name RESUME WAL FROM TXN writerTxn;
These quick checks can help you unstick ingestion pipelines without losing data integrity.
Why It Matters
In a realtime system:
- Kafka ensures scalable pub/sub messaging.
- QuestDB with WAL ensures fault-tolerant storage.
Together, they deliver speed + reliability — a reliable realtime data systems.
In summary
- wal_tables() lists all QuestDB tables using Write-Ahead Logging
- WAL = durability + parallel ingestion + easy recovery
- a reliable real-time systems like location tracking with Kafka ingestion
References
“Real-time systems aren’t just about speed — they’re about trusting every update you receive.”
What’s your go-to tech stack for handling real-time data ingestion?



Top comments (0)