DEV Community

Cover image for Top 10 Best Strapi To WordPress Migration Companies Every Developer Should Know in 2026
Oliver Pitts
Oliver Pitts

Posted on

Top 10 Best Strapi To WordPress Migration Companies Every Developer Should Know in 2026

Top 10 Best Strapi To WordPress Migration Companies Every Developer Should Know in 2026

Your Strapi Instance Is Costing More Than the Hosting Bill

Here is the engineering post-mortem nobody publishes but everyone in the room has lived through: you built a Strapi v4 deployment in 2021. Node.js backend on a cloud VPS. PostgreSQL for content storage. The frontend is a Next.js app consuming the REST API. The content model is clean. The GraphQL layer is properly configured. Your CTO described it as "future-proof architecture."

Then real operational reality arrived. Strapi Cloud crossed $500 per month as content volume grew. The Strapi v4 to v5 migration sat on the backlog for eight months because it introduced breaking changes to the Content Manager, the Users and Permissions plugin, and the upload plugin simultaneously. The marketing team filed 47 tickets over three months for what should have been self-service content updates. And the senior developer who owned the Strapi instance left, taking institutional knowledge of the custom field configurations with them.

This is not a story about Strapi being a bad platform. Strapi is a genuinely capable headless CMS for the right use case. But it was designed for developer-centric teams with dedicated Node.js operations capacity, and most organisations running Strapi in 2026 are not that team.

WordPress powers 43.6% of all websites globally. WPGraphQL delivers the same GraphQL content API that Strapi provides. The REST API is native. Managed hosting on WP Engine or Kinsta eliminates the Node.js operations overhead entirely. And the 60,000+ plugin ecosystem covers every use case that required custom Strapi extension development.

A Strapi to WordPress Migration is the technical decision that converts a developer-dependent content pipeline into a self-serve editorial platform without sacrificing the headless API architecture your frontend team actually wants. This is the developer-facing shortlist of agencies that execute it correctly in 2026.

The Technical Case for Moving from Strapi to WordPress in 2026

The market data is clear. Strapi holds a small share of the headless CMS market versus WordPress's 43.6% of all websites. But the operational data is what drives migration decisions:

Self-hosted Strapi requires 45 to 48% more operational time than managed platforms (InMotion Hosting, 2026). Strapi Cloud's pricing scales from $29 per month to well past $500 per month for content-heavy deployments with no perpetual alternative. Strapi v5's breaking changes from v4 include a unified Document API replacing the Entity Service, deprecated plugin APIs, and database schema migrations that require dedicated engineering time. And CVE-2023-22893, CVE-2023-22894, and related authentication vulnerabilities in Strapi v4 were publicly documented, with patches only available for users actively maintaining upgrades.

WordPress with WPGraphQL delivers the same decoupled architecture Strapi provides. The REST API at /wp-json/wp/v2/ serves JSON content for frontend consumption. Your existing React or Next.js frontend can re-point API calls from Strapi endpoints to WordPress equivalents with field mapping adjustments. For organisations that want to preserve their decoupled frontend while replacing the Node.js backend with managed PHP infrastructure, this is the migration path that minimises frontend risk.

Three developer-relevant shifts in 2026 strengthen the WordPress case:

WPGraphQL's schema generation is now production-equivalent to Strapi's. The WPGraphQL plugin generates a type-safe GraphQL schema from WordPress content types, including Custom Post Types and ACF field groups, that matches the flexibility of Strapi's auto-generated GraphQL layer. For React and Next.js frontends already consuming Strapi's GraphQL API, the migration to WPGraphQL is a schema remapping exercise rather than a frontend rebuild.

Headless WordPress on managed hosting eliminates the Node.js operations overhead. Self-hosted Strapi requires managing Node.js process management, PM2 or equivalent, PostgreSQL, environment variable management, and build pipelines. Managed WordPress on Kinsta or WP Engine eliminates all of these: PHP runs natively on the managed host, updates are automated, and the database is managed. The operational overhead delta is measurable in engineering hours per month.

Advanced Custom Fields Pro's Flexible Content field provides a production-grade dynamic zones equivalent. Strapi's dynamic zones, which allow editors to compose pages from variable sequences of typed component blocks, map directly to ACF Pro's Flexible Content field with layout sub-fields matching the original component schemas. This mapping is not an approximation. It is a deliberate, field-for-field architectural translation.

Top 10 Best Strapi To WordPress Migration Companies in 2026

1. EbizON

The enterprise migration partner with 2,200+ delivered solutions, a discovery-first Strapi content architecture methodology covering collection type mapping, dynamic zone ACF translation, API extraction, relation resolution, and zero-downtime migration execution for teams where SEO continuity and editorial autonomy are the migration objectives.

Hourly Rate: $25-$49/hr | Min. Project Size: $1,000+

EbizON's Strapi to WordPress Migration practice starts with the architectural decision that determines the entire migration scope: is the destination traditional WordPress, or headless WordPress with WPGraphQL?

For organisations that chose Strapi specifically for its API-first content delivery to a decoupled frontend, headless WordPress is almost always the right destination. Their discovery phase evaluates the existing Next.js or React frontend's API consumption patterns, maps Strapi collection type endpoints to WordPress REST API or WPGraphQL equivalents, and documents the field mapping required to re-point the frontend without a rebuild. This option is significantly more efficient than a full traditional WordPress migration for teams that value their frontend stack.

For organisations migrating to traditional WordPress to eliminate the developer dependency entirely, the discovery phase maps every Strapi collection type to its WordPress Custom Post Type equivalent, every dynamic zone to its ACF Flexible Content layout with sub-fields aligned to the original component schemas, and every relation field to its WordPress post relationship counterpart.

Content extraction uses Strapi's REST API with full population of relations using the ?populate parameter, custom pagination handling for large content libraries, and transformation scripts that resolve relation IDs before WordPress import rather than after. Media assets are migrated with alt text and caption metadata from Strapi's media library API, not just the binary files. The 301 redirect mapping is built from a Screaming Frog crawl of the live frontend, capturing every URL the router generated, not just the Strapi content tree.

Client feedback is specific. One noted "meticulous attention to detail throughout the entire project," calling the transition "such a smooth and pleasant experience." A subscription platform client highlighted EbizON's ability to handle complex data migration without disrupting live user operations. Enterprise clients in retail, e-learning, and cosmetics have engaged EbizON for migrations combining platform transition with WooCommerce integration and AI feature delivery.

  • Headless vs traditional WordPress evaluation: architecture decision made during discovery, not assumed
  • Dynamic zone to ACF Flexible Content mapping: every component type mapped to named layout with sub-fields
  • Strapi REST API extraction with ?populate for relation resolution before WordPress import
  • Media migration with alt text and caption metadata from Strapi media library API
  • 301 redirect mapping from live frontend Screaming Frog crawl, not Strapi content tree
  • Own test server execution: live Strapi 100% available throughout, DNS cutover post-QA only

Strapi to WordPress Migration with EbizON is the right call when the architecture decision needs to be made before the migration plan is written.

2. CMSTOWP

The dedicated CMS-to-WordPress migration specialist with a documented Strapi to WordPress service, in-house upgrade scripts, private test server execution, and SEO preservation as a standard milestone on every engagement.

Hourly Rate: $25-$49/hr | Min. Project Size: $1,000+

CMSTOWP exists for one purpose: migrating websites from other CMS platforms to WordPress. Their Strapi to WordPress service uses in-house upgrade scripts for Strapi content extraction and WordPress import. All work runs on private test servers. The live Strapi installation is never touched. Pre-migration URL crawl, redirect mapping for high-value inbound links, post-migration 404 validation, and a business objectives discussion before technical work begins are standard milestones on every engagement.

Their data structure mapping covers Strapi collection types, single types, and component schemas mapped to WordPress equivalents. The free 30-minute migration audit surfaces dynamic zone complexity and integration scope before any timeline or budget is committed.

Beverly Hilton, Product Manager at Macmillan Publishers: "Within twenty four hours, CMStoWP responded to my inquiry. My customer is very happy with the WordPress environment. Our project delivered on time and within budget."

  • CMS-to-WordPress migration as the sole business discipline
  • In-house Strapi extraction and WordPress import scripts
  • Private test server execution with live Strapi fully available throughout
  • Data structure mapping and business objectives discussion before extraction
  • SEO preservation covering redirects, metadata, and schema as standard
  • Free 30-minute migration audit for pre-engagement scoping

CMSTOWP Strapi Migration Page

3. CartUnited

A platform migration specialist with 13+ years of experience, 50+ completed transitions, 150+ global team members, and documented delivery outcomes including zero downtime, full SEO metadata retention, and 90+ PageSpeed scores on WordPress destination builds.

Hourly Rate: $25-$49/hr | Min. Project Size: $1,000+

CartUnited brings structured platform migration methodology to CMS and eCommerce transitions covering the full SEO metadata layer: URLs, meta tags, meta titles, and page titles. Zero-downtime delivery with staging-first execution is standard. One client reported a 10% sales uplift in the first month post-migration alongside zero downtime, describing CartUnited as "so easy to work with and flexible" with "meticulous attention to detail." For Strapi organisations with eCommerce requirements, their commerce migration depth extends beyond standard content agencies.

  • 13+ years of platform migration experience with 50+ completed transitions
  • SEO retention: URLs, meta tags, meta titles, and page titles preserved
  • Zero-downtime delivery with staging-first execution and validated DNS switchover
  • 90+ PageSpeed Score and Core Web Vitals compliance on destination WordPress builds
  • 150+ global team across development, SEO, and project management
  • Commerce migration expertise for Strapi sites requiring WooCommerce on WordPress

4. Web Management

A Clutch-listed web management and development agency with WordPress capability, delivering structured web development and maintenance services for Strapi migration clients who need reliable, professionally managed delivery with ongoing post-migration support.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

Web Management delivers web development and management services with WordPress as a primary delivery platform. Their web management background is directly relevant for Strapi migration clients whose primary operational frustration is the ongoing management overhead of Node.js infrastructure. An agency that treats post-migration WordPress management as a core service offering, rather than an afterthought, delivers better operational continuity outcomes. Their Clutch-listed profile provides independent verification of professional delivery standards.

  • WordPress web development and management with Clutch-verified delivery track record
  • Web management background directly relevant for Strapi clients leaving Node.js operations overhead
  • Structured web development and ongoing maintenance as integrated service offerings
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients who want managed WordPress continuity post-migration
  • Professional delivery model with defined milestones and post-migration management capability
  • Accessible for organisations whose Strapi migration is driven by operational management simplification

5. Chris Mackie

A Clutch-listed specialist web developer with WordPress expertise, delivering precise, technically clean WordPress builds for Strapi migration clients who value direct developer engagement and individual accountability over agency account management layers.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

Chris Mackie delivers web development services as a specialist professional with WordPress as a core delivery platform. For Strapi migration clients with well-scoped briefs and a preference for working directly with the developer delivering the project, this specialist model provides personal accountability and technical precision that volume-based agency environments dilute. The direct engagement model means the developer who scopes the migration is the developer who executes it, eliminating the translation loss that occurs when project briefs pass through account management layers.

  • WordPress web development specialist with Clutch-verified delivery track record
  • Direct engagement model: the developer who scopes the project delivers it
  • Technical precision and individual accountability throughout the migration engagement
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients with focused, well-specified migration scopes
  • Personal accountability delivering attentive attention that volume agencies cannot replicate
  • Accessible for organisations with standard Strapi content architectures and defined WordPress requirements

6. Creativelifeform

A Clutch-listed creative web agency with WordPress development capability, combining creative design and technical development for Strapi migration clients whose WordPress destination needs to reflect genuine visual quality alongside correct API and content architecture.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

Creativelifeform delivers creative web design and WordPress development with a design-forward culture that is relevant for Strapi migration clients whose existing decoupled frontend accumulated visual quality that the WordPress destination must match or surpass. For product teams whose migration is also an opportunity to modernise the editorial-facing admin interface and the public-facing design simultaneously, Creativelifeform's creative and technical combined capability delivers both requirements within a single engagement.

  • Creative web design and WordPress development with Clutch-verified delivery track record
  • Design-forward culture: visual quality as a primary delivery standard alongside technical migration
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients with visual quality requirements on the WordPress destination
  • Combined creative and technical delivery for single-vendor migration and destination design
  • Accessible for product teams combining Strapi migration with a frontend design refresh
  • Professional studio delivery with accountability appropriate for brand-conscious organisations

7. Geek Force Web

A Clutch-listed web development agency with WordPress expertise, delivering technically rigorous web builds for Strapi migration clients who want engineering-quality WordPress codebases that developers can maintain and extend confidently post-migration.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

Geek Force Web delivers web development services with WordPress as a delivery platform and an engineering-rigorous approach that is directly relevant for Strapi migration clients migrating away from a developer-built system and wanting a WordPress destination that meets the same engineering standards. Their technical delivery culture prioritises correct CPT and ACF architecture, clean maintainable PHP, and WordPress development best practices over the plugin-heavy approaches that create the technical debt that motivates migrations in the first place.

  • WordPress web development with engineering-rigorous delivery culture and Clutch-verified track record
  • Correct CPT and ACF architecture for maintainable, developer-quality WordPress codebases
  • Clean PHP approach over excessive plugin dependencies for complex destination requirements
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients who demand engineering quality from their WordPress destination
  • Technical rigour appropriate for organisations whose Strapi was built to developer standards
  • Accessible for technically sophisticated product teams migrating from Strapi to WordPress

8. n7 Studios

A Clutch-listed creative digital studio with WordPress development capability, combining brand strategy, visual storytelling, and technical web development for Strapi migration clients whose destination site needs to function as both a content platform and a brand asset.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

n7 Studios delivers creative digital work combining brand strategy, visual storytelling, and WordPress web development. Their studio-level approach is relevant for Strapi migration clients in media, creative technology, entertainment, and brand-driven product organisations whose WordPress destination is expected to carry genuine creative ambition alongside the technical migration accuracy. For product teams who built on Strapi's clean API architecture and want an equally considered approach applied to the WordPress editorial experience design and visual output, n7 Studios delivers that creative standard.

  • Creative digital studio combining brand strategy, visual storytelling, and WordPress development
  • Clutch-listed with verified creative agency delivery track record
  • Studio-level creative: WordPress destination built as a brand asset, not a generic CMS install
  • Relevant for media and creative organisations migrating from Strapi with elevated design requirements
  • Brand strategy alongside technical migration for Strapi organisations repositioning through migration
  • Accessible for product teams in brand-driven sectors migrating from Strapi's API-first model

9. BEVIN Creative

A Clutch-listed creative and web design agency with WordPress capability, delivering distinctive web presences for Strapi migration clients in creative industries where the WordPress destination must visually differentiate the brand in competitive markets.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

BEVIN Creative delivers creative web design and WordPress development with a culture that treats design quality as non-negotiable alongside technical delivery. Their creative agency approach is relevant for Strapi migration clients in design-adjacent, creative services, and lifestyle sectors whose WordPress destination must compete visually in markets where the website is a primary impression point. For organisations whose Strapi deployment was API-correct but visually generic, BEVIN Creative's design capability delivers the visual distinction that makes the migration a commercial upgrade as well as a technical one.

  • Creative web design and WordPress development with Clutch-verified delivery track record
  • Design-quality culture: WordPress destination delivers visual distinction in competitive markets
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients in design-adjacent and lifestyle sectors
  • Combined creative and technical delivery for complete WordPress destination build
  • Creative-first approach for organisations whose Strapi site lacked visual ambition
  • Accessible for product teams pairing Strapi migration with a meaningful brand design upgrade

10. Celestial Tech

A Clutch-listed technology and development agency with WordPress capability, delivering structured technical projects with engineering discipline and formal delivery processes for Strapi migration clients with IT governance or formally documented delivery requirements.

Hourly Rate: Undisclosed | Min. Project Size: Undisclosed

Celestial Tech delivers technology and web development services with WordPress as a delivery platform and a formal technology company approach to digital projects. Their structured delivery methodology is relevant for Strapi migration clients with formal IT governance requirements: organisations in regulated industries, enterprise procurement environments, or public sector contexts where CMS transitions must produce documented acceptance testing, formal project sign-off, and auditable delivery records. Their Clutch-listed profile demonstrates professional technology services delivery standards.

  • Technology and WordPress development with engineering discipline and Clutch-verified delivery
  • Formal delivery processes: acceptance testing, documented milestones, and auditable project records
  • Relevant for Strapi migration clients in regulated industries with IT governance requirements
  • Technology company approach appropriate for formally governed CMS migration engagements
  • Structured project management with defined technical acceptance criteria
  • Accessible for enterprise and public sector organisations migrating from Strapi with governance requirements

The Three Technical Questions That Separate Agencies With Strapi Experience From Those Without

These take less than five minutes to ask on a discovery call and immediately reveal platform familiarity.

Question one: How do you populate relations in Strapi v5 when extracting collection type data via the REST API?

In Strapi v5, the Document Service API replaced the Entity Service. The ?populate=* parameter provides shallow population. For deeply nested relations and dynamic zone components, a targeted populate object is required. An agency that has extracted Strapi v5 content knows this distinction and describes the population strategy. An agency that has not worked with Strapi v5 specifically will describe Strapi v4 extraction patterns or give a generic API response.

Question two: How do you map a Strapi dynamic zone with five component types to ACF Flexible Content?

The correct answer: each allowed component type in the dynamic zone becomes a named layout in the ACF Flexible Content field. Sub-fields within each layout match the original Strapi component's field schema field-for-field. The transformation script reads the dynamic zone array, identifies each element's __component identifier (Strapi v4) or component field (Strapi v5), and writes the values to the corresponding ACF Flexible Content layout using the WordPress REST API or WP-CLI. An agency that cannot describe this mapping at this level of specificity has not built ACF Flexible Content fields from Strapi dynamic zone data.

Question three: How do you handle the redirect mapping for a Strapi site with a decoupled Next.js frontend?

The correct answer involves recognising that Strapi itself does not generate URLs — the Next.js router does. The 301 redirect map must be built from a Screaming Frog crawl of the deployed Next.js frontend, not from the Strapi content tree. Discrepancies between what Next.js routes were configured and what was actually indexed by Google require a crawl of the live site, not a code review of the routing configuration.

The Engineering Mistakes That Create Post-Migration Technical Debt

Not evaluating headless WordPress as the destination architecture before defaulting to traditional WordPress. For organisations that specifically chose Strapi for API-first content delivery to a React or Next.js frontend, migrating to traditional WordPress may recreate the developer dependency at the theme layer that motivated leaving Strapi in the first place. The honest evaluation question is: does the content team need a visual block editor, or does the engineering team need a content API? If it is the latter, headless WordPress with WPGraphQL is the correct architecture.

Using Strapi's CSV export for collection types with relations. Strapi's admin panel export does not populate relation fields — it exports the relation field values as internal Strapi IDs that have no meaning in a WordPress context. An agency that uses the CSV export for complex content types will produce a WordPress import with unresolved relation fields that surface as broken post relationships post-launch.

Not handling Strapi v4 to v5 schema differences when migrating a deployment that was partially upgraded. Strapi v5's Document Service API introduced unified draft/published document management under a single document concept, replacing the separate draft and published entities of v4. If the Strapi instance has content in both draft and published states, the extraction must explicitly target the published status using the status=published query parameter to avoid importing draft content into the live WordPress destination.

Building the ACF Flexible Content layout structure after content extraction rather than before. ACF Flexible Content fields must exist in the WordPress database with the correct layout definitions before any content import can write to them. Agencies that extract Strapi dynamic zone content and then build the ACF architecture in parallel create import failures when the layout definitions do not match the content being written. Design the ACF architecture first, validate it with test imports, then run the full extraction.

The Migration That Returns Engineering Capacity to the Team

The product teams that completed their Strapi to WordPress Migration consistently report one outcome above all others: engineering hours that were previously consumed by Strapi infrastructure maintenance, plugin updates, Node.js version management, and content team ticket resolution are now available for product development. The content team updates independently. The marketing team activates campaigns without raising tickets. The engineering team ships features.

EbizON's Strapi to WordPress Migration practice is built to deliver that outcome with technical correctness. Headless vs traditional architecture evaluation during discovery. Dynamic zone to ACF Flexible Content mapping before extraction begins. Strapi API extraction with full relation population. Media migration with alt text and caption metadata. 301 redirect mapping from live frontend crawl. Staging-environment execution throughout. Post-launch monitoring with the migration team. 2,200+ delivered solutions.

Talk to EbizON's technical team and get the architecture evaluation before any migration scope is committed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I migrate to traditional WordPress or headless WordPress from Strapi?

If your team chose Strapi specifically for API-first content delivery to a React or Next.js frontend, headless WordPress with WPGraphQL is almost always the right destination. Your existing frontend can re-point API calls from Strapi endpoints to WordPress REST API or WPGraphQL equivalents with field mapping adjustments rather than a full rebuild. If your migration motivation is eliminating developer dependency and giving the content team a visual block editor, traditional WordPress with Gutenberg is the correct destination. Both architectures are valid. The choice should be made during discovery based on the team's actual operational requirements, not assumed.

How are Strapi dynamic zones mapped to WordPress?

Strapi dynamic zones map to ACF Flexible Content fields in WordPress (requires ACF Pro). Each component type allowed in a dynamic zone becomes a named layout in the Flexible Content field with sub-fields matching the original Strapi component schema. For example, a Strapi TextBlock component with title and content fields becomes an ACF layout named text_block with text and WYSIWYG sub-fields. The mapping must be fully designed and the ACF field groups built before content extraction begins — not configured in parallel with the import.

How do you extract Strapi content for WordPress import?

In Strapi v5, content is accessed via the Document Service REST API at /api/collection-type-uid endpoints with authentication via API token. Full relation population uses a targeted populate object for complex schemas with nested components. The extracted JSON is transformed into WordPress WXR format for standard imports or inserted directly via the WordPress REST API or WP-CLI for large migrations. In Strapi v4, the Entity Service API and REST endpoints at /api/ are used with ?populate=* for shallow population or a targeted populate structure for deeper relations. Agencies that have migrated from both v4 and v5 understand the Document Service API changes in v5 and handle them accordingly.

How long does a Strapi to WordPress migration take?

A standard migration for a Strapi deployment with moderate content type complexity and under 10,000 content items typically runs 7 to 11 weeks from discovery to DNS cutover per rtCamp's enterprise migration guide. Smaller deployments with standard collection types and no dynamic zones can migrate in 4 to 6 weeks. Enterprise-scale migrations with 50,000+ content items, deeply nested dynamic zones, and extensive relation graphs require 12 to 16 weeks or more. The discovery phase covering content type mapping, integration inventory, and redirect planning typically takes 2 to 3 weeks on a complex engagement.

What happens to Strapi's user roles and permissions after migration?

Strapi's RBAC system with granular permissions per content type and action exceeds WordPress's default role capabilities. For organisations with complex editorial permission structures, WordPress plugins such as PublishPress Permissions, Members, or User Role Editor extend the native role system to replicate Strapi-level permission granularity. The role and permission mapping must be designed during discovery and tested with real editorial workflows before go-live.

Can the live Strapi installation stay operational during migration?

Yes. All migration work runs on staging infrastructure. The live Strapi installation continues serving your frontend application throughout. DNS cutover happens only after the staged WordPress destination has been fully QA-tested, redirect coverage validated, and API endpoint equivalents confirmed for headless deployments. For headless migrations where the frontend is re-pointed at WordPress APIs, the frontend deployment should be tested against the staged WordPress API before the Strapi instance is decommissioned.

How is media metadata handled when migrating from Strapi to WordPress?

Strapi stores media metadata in the uploads table including the file's alternativeText (alt text), caption, and width/height dimensions alongside the binary file URL. The migration must query the Strapi /api/upload/files endpoint to retrieve all media entries with their metadata, download binary files, upload them to the WordPress media library via the REST API, and then update each created attachment post's meta with the migrated alternativeText value via the _wp_attachment_image_alt meta key. Media migration that copies only binary files without metadata produces a WordPress media library with empty alt attributes at scale.

What third-party integrations need to be rebuilt after migrating from Strapi?

Authentication providers (Auth0 or similar via WordPress plugins), analytics (Google Analytics via Site Kit), marketing automation (HubSpot or Klaviyo via dedicated WordPress plugins), payment processing (Stripe via WooCommerce), search services (Algolia or Elasticsearch via WordPress integration libraries), and CDN configurations (Cloudflare via WordPress plugin) all require WordPress-specific planning. Custom Strapi integrations built on the plugin API require custom PHP development on the WordPress side. The integration inventory is a required discovery deliverable before migration scope can be accurately estimated.

How much does a Strapi to WordPress migration cost?

Migration costs depend on content model complexity and content library size. Focused migrations with straightforward collection types and no dynamic zones typically start around $2,000 to $8,000. Mid-scale migrations with dynamic zones, relational content, and third-party integration rebuilding run $8,000 to $30,000. Enterprise migrations with large content libraries, complex dynamic zone architectures, API frontend preservation, and governance documentation can exceed $100,000. The discovery phase that maps collection types to WordPress architecture is the investment that makes subsequent estimates accurate.

Why should I choose EbizON for my Strapi to WordPress migration?

EbizON's Strapi to WordPress Migration practice is built around the technical specifics that determine whether this migration delivers correctly the first time. Their discovery phase makes the headless vs traditional WordPress architecture decision with full information before any extraction begins. Dynamic zone to ACF Flexible Content mapping is designed from the Strapi component schemas before any content is extracted. API extraction uses full relation population with Strapi v4 and v5-aware strategies. Media migration carries alt text and captions alongside binary files. The 301 redirect map is built from a live frontend crawl. Migration runs on EbizON's own test servers with the live Strapi installation fully operational. Post-launch monitoring is contracted and staffed by the migration team. With 2,200+ delivered solutions and technical methodology built on genuine Strapi API familiarity, EbizON is the team organisations choose when the Strapi migration needs to be architecturally correct from day one.

Top comments (0)