DEV Community

Cover image for How to Enforce Policies Without Blocking Hotfixes
Piyush Gaikwad
Piyush Gaikwad

Posted on

How to Enforce Policies Without Blocking Hotfixes

Hotfixes are different by nature.

  • They are urgent, because production is already impacted.
  • They are small, because the goal is to stop the bleeding, not redesign the system.
  • They are high-risk, because they touch live systems under pressure.
  • And they are high-impact, because even a one-line change can affect thousands or millions of users.

Yet many teams still apply exactly the same rules to:

  • a large feature PR with weeks of context, and
  • a one-line production fix at 2 AM during an incident. This mismatch is where friction — and eventually policy violations — begin.

The “Tag to Skip Checks” Anti-Pattern

Most organizations already feel this pain, which is why a common workaround exists.
Teams introduce:

  • labels like skip-ci, emergency, hotfix
  • manual tags that disable required checks
  • undocumented conventions known only to senior engineers

On paper, this looks like speed. In practice, it’s silent policy erosion.

Once skipping checks becomes normal:

  • accountability drops
  • audits become painful
  • security teams lose trust in CI signals
  • “emergency” becomes a habit, not an exception

The problem is not the desire for speed — it’s that tags remove guardrails instead of reshaping them.


2 Pipeline Checks

Most modern engineering systems today rely on a Git-based workflow, where even hotfixes are required to flow through Pull Requests (PRs). These PRs are protected by required checks that must succeed before a change can be merged. To avoid blocking urgent fixes, many organizations split validation into two deliberate stages.

  • Pre-merge checks: The first stage consists of pre-merge checks, which are intentionally fast and lightweight, focused on validating that the change does not immediately break tests or violate basic policies.

  • pre-checkin : Once these checks pass, developers are allowed to proceed with pre-checkin. A successful pre-checkin automatically merges the PR, removing manual delays while still ensuring that every hotfix follows a controlled, auditable path.

In most of the companies, to merge a change it is requried to successfully pass Pre-merge checks and pre-checkin check; For Hotfix changes to go in faster, Pre-merge checks can be made reliant by using Ruleset or branch protection rules.

What a Good Hotfix Ruleset Looks Like:

  • pull request still required (no direct pushes)
  • fewer, faster required checks (unit, smoke, secret scanning)
  • approvals required, but limited to on-call / release owners
  • force pushes still blocked
  • bypass allowed only to a very small group, and always logged

Top comments (0)