Template literals
Template literals make working with string so much easier than before. They're started with a back tick and can have variables inserted using ${variable}. Compare these two lines of code:
var fName = 'Peter', sName = 'Smith', age = 43, job = 'photographer';
var a = 'Hi, I\'m ' + fName + ' ' + sName + ', I\'m ' + age + ' and work as a ' + job + '.';
var b = `Hi, I'm ${ fName } ${ sName }, I'm ${ age } and work as a ${ job }.`;
This makes life far simpler and code easier to read. You can put anything inside of the curly braces: variables, equations, or function calls. I'll use these in examples throughout this article.
Block scoping
JavaScript has always been scoped by functions, which is why it had become common to wrap the whole of a JavaScript file in an empty immediately invoked function expression (IIFE). This is done to isolate all of the variables in the file, so there are no variable conflicts.
Now we have block scoping and two new variable declarations which are bound to a block.
Let Declaration
This is similar to the 'var' but has a few notable differences. Because it's block scoped, a new variable with the same name can be declared without affecting outer variables.
var a = 'car' ;
{
let a = 5;
console.log(a); // 5
}
console.log(a); // car
Because its bound to a block scope, it solves this classic interview question:
"what is output and how would you get it to work as you expect"
for (var i = 1; i < 5; i++){
setTimeout(() => { console.log(i); }, 1000);
}
In this case it outputs "5 5 5 5 5" because the variable i changes on each iteration.
If you switch out the var for let then everything changes. Now each loop creates a new block scope with the value for i bound to that loop. It is though you've written.
{let i = 1; setTimeout(() => { console.log(i) }, 1000)}
{let i = 2; setTimeout(() => { console.log(i) }, 1000)}
{let i = 3; setTimeout(() => { console.log(i) }, 1000)}
{let i = 4; setTimeout(() => { console.log(i) }, 1000)}
{let i = 5; setTimeout(() => { console.log(i) }, 1000)}
Another difference between var and let is that let isn't hoisted as var is.
{
console.log(a); // undefined
console.log(b); // ReferenceError
var a = 'car';
let b = 5;
}
Because of its tighter scoping and more predictable behaviour, some people have said that you should use 'let' instead of 'var', except where you specifically need the hoisting or looser scoping of the 'var' declaration.
Const
If you wanted to declare a constant variable in JavaScript before, it was convention to name the variable in block caps, but it wouldnt secure the variable, just let other developers know that you it was a constant and shouldn't be changed.
Now we have the const declaration.
{
const c = "tree";
console.log(c); // tree
c = 46; // TypeError!
}
Const doesn't make the variable immutable, just locks its assignment. If you have a complex assignment (object or array) then the value can still be modified.
{
const d = [1, 2, 3, 4];
const dave = { name: 'David Jones', age: 32};
d.push(5);
dave.job = "salesman";
console.log(d); // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
console.log(dave); // { age: 32, job: "salesman", name: 'David Jones'}
}
Problem with block scoping functions
Function declarations are now specified to be bound to block scoping.
{
bar(); // works
function bar() { /* do something */ }
}
bar(); // doesn't work
The problem comes when you declare a function inside an if statement. Consider this:
if ( something) {
function baz() { console.log('I passed') }
} else {
function baz() { console.log('I didn\'t pass') }
}
baz();
Before ES6, both function declarations would have been hoisted and the result would have been 'I didn't pass' no matter what something was.
Now we get 'ReferenceError' as baz is always bound by the block scope.
Spread
ES6 introduces the ... operator which is referred to as the spread operator. It has two main uses: spreading an array or object into a new array or object, and joining multiple parameters into an array. The first use case is the one you'll probably encounter most so well look at that first.
let a = [3, 4, 5];
let b = [1, 2, ...a, 6];
console.log(b); // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
This can be very useful for passing in a set of variables to a function from an array.
function foo(a, b, c) { console.log(`a=${a}, b=${b}, c=${c}`)}
let data = [5, 15, 2];
foo( ...data); // a=5, b=15, c=2
An object can also be spread, inputting each of the key value pairs into the new object.
let car = { type: 'vehicle ', wheels: 4};
let fordGt = { make: 'Ford', ...car, model: 'GT'};
console.log(fordGt); // {make: 'Ford', model: 'GT', type: 'vehicle', wheels: 4}
Another feature of the spread operator is that it creates new array or object. The example below creates a new array for b, but c just refers to the same array.
let a = [1, 2, 3];
let b = [ ...a ];
let c = a;
b.push(4);
console.log(a); // [1, 2, 3]
console.log(b); // [1, 2, 3, 4] referencing different arrays
c.push(5);
console.log(a); // [1, 2, 3, 5]
console.log(c); // [1, 2, 3, 5] referencing the same array
The second use case is gathering variables together into an array. This is very useful for when you don’t know how many variables are being passed to a function.
function foo(...args) {
console.log(args);
}
foo( 'car', 54, 'tree'); // [ 'car', 54, 'tree' ]
Default Parameters
Functions can now be defined with default parameters. Missing or undefined values are initialised with the default value. Just be careful because null and false values are coerced to 0.
function foo( a = 5, b = 10) {
console.log( a + b);
}
foo(); // 15
foo( 7, 12 ); // 19
foo( undefined, 8 ); // 13
foo( 8 ); // 18
foo( null ); // 10 as null is coerced to 0
The default values can be more than just values, they can be expressions or functions.
function foo( a ) { return a * 4; }
function bar( x = 2, y = x + 4, z = foo(x)) {
console.log([ x, y, z ]);
}
bar(); // [ 2, 6, 8 ]
bar( 1, 2, 3 ); //[ 1, 2, 3 ]
bar( 10, undefined, 3 ); // [ 10, 14, 3 ]
Destructuring
Destructuring is the process of taking apart the array or object on the left hand side of the equal sign. The array or object can come from a variable, function or equation.
let [ a, b, c ] = [ 6, 2, 9];
console.log(`a=${a}, b=${b}, c=${c}`); //a=6, b=2, c=9
function foo() { return ['car', 'dog', 6 ]; }
let [ x, y, z ] = foo();
console.log(`x=${x}, y=${y}, z=${z}`); // x=car, y=dog, z=6
With objects destructuring the keys of the object can be listed inside curly braces to extract that key-value pair.
function bar() { return {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}; }
let { a, c } = bar();
console.log(a); // 1
console.log(c); // 3
console.log(b); // undefined
Sometimes you want to extract the values but assign them to a new variable. This is done using a 'key: variable' pairing on the left of the equals sign.
function baz() {
return {
x: 'car',
y: 'London',
z: { name: 'John', age: 21}
};
}
let { x: vehicle, y: city, z: { name: driver } } = baz();
console.log(
`I'm going to ${city} with ${driver} in their ${vehicle}.`
); // I'm going to London with John in their car.
Another thing that object destructuring allows is assigning a value to multiple variables.
let { x: first, x: second } = { x: 4 };
console.log( first, second ); // 4, 4
Object Literals and Concise Parameters
When you are creating an object literal from variables, ES6 allows you to omit the key if it is the same as the variable name.
let a = 4, b = 7;
let c = { a: a, b: b };
let concise = { a, b };
console.log( c, concise ); // { a: 4, b: 7 }, { a: 4, b: 7 }
This can also be used in combination with destructuring to make your code much simpler and cleaner.
function foo() {
return {
name: 'Anna',
age: 56,
job: { company: 'Tesco', title: 'Manager' }
};
}
// pre ES6
let a = foo(), name = a.name, age = a.age, company = a.job.company;
// ES6 destructuring and concise parameters
let { name, age, job: {company} } = foo();
It can also be used to destructure objects passed into functions. Method 1 and 2 are how you would have done it before ES6, and method 3 uses destructuring and concise parameters.
let person = {
name: 'Anna',
age: 56,
job: { company: 'Tesco', title: 'Manager' }
};
// method 1
function old1( person) {
var yearOfBirth = 2018 - person.age;
console.log( `${ person.name } works at ${ person.job.company } and was born in ${ yearOfBirth }.`);
}
// method 2
function old1( person) {
var age = person.age,
yearOfBirth = 2018 - age,
name = person.name,
company = person.job.company;
console.log( `${ name } works at ${ company } and was born in ${ yearOfBirth }.`);
}
// method 3
function es6({ age, name, job: {company} }) {
var yearOfBirth = 2018 - age;
console.log( `${ name } works at ${ company } and was born in ${ yearOfBirth }.`);
}
Using ES6 we can extract the age, name and company without extra variable declaration.
Dynamic Property Names
ES6 adds the ability to create or add properties with dynamicly assigned keys.
let city = 'sheffield_';
let a = {
[ city + 'population' ]: 350000
};
a[ city + 'county' ] = 'South Yorkshire';
console.log(a); // {sheffield_population: 350000, sheffield_county: 'South Yorkshire' }
Arrow Functions
Arrow functions have 2 main ways: their structure and their 'this' binding.
They can have a much simpler structure than traditional functions because they don't need the 'function' key word and they automatically return whatever is after the arrow.
var foo = function( a, b ) {
return a * b;
}
let bar = ( a, b ) => a * b;
If the function requires more than a simple calculation, curly braces can be used
and the function returns whatever is returned from the bock scope.
let baz = ( c, d ) => {
let length = c.length + d.toString().length;
let e = c.join(', ');
return `${e} and there is a total length of ${length}`;
}
One of the most useful places for arrow functions is in array functions like .map, .forEach or .sort.
let arr = [ 5, 6, 7, 8, 'a' ];
let b = arr.map( item => item + 3 );
console.log(b); // [ 8, 9, 10, 11, 'a3' ]
As well as having a shorter syntax, it also fixes the issues that often arose around the this binding behaviour. The fix with pre-ES6 functions was to store the this reference, often as a self variable.
var clickController = {
doSomething: function (..) {
var self = this;
btn.addEventListener(
'click',
function() { self.doSomething(..) },
False
);
}
};
This had to be done as the because the this binding is dynamic. This means that the this inside the event listener and the this inside the doSomething do not refer to the same thing.
Inside arrow functions, the this binding is lexical, not dynamic. This was the main design feature of the arrow function.
Whilst lexical this binding can be great, sometimes that's not what is wanted.
let a = {
oneThing: ( a ) => {
let b = a * 2;
this.otherThing(b);
},
otherThing: ( b ) => {....}
};
a.oneThing(6);
When we use a.oneThing(6), the this.otherThing( b ) reference fails as this doesn't point to the a object, but to the surrounding scope. If you are rewriting legacy code using ES6 syntax, this is something to watch out for.
for … of Loops
ES6 adds a way to iterate over each of the values in an array. This is different from the existing for ... in loop that loops over the key/index.
let a = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd' ];
// ES6
for ( var val of a ) {
console.log( val );
} // "a" "b" "c" "d"
// pre-ES6
for ( var idx in a ) {
console.log( idx );
} // 0 1 2 3
Using the new for … of loop saves adding a let val = a[idx] inside each loop.
Arrays, strings, generators and collections are all iterable in standard JavaScript. Plain objects can't normally be iterated over, unless you have defined an iterator for it.
Number Literals
ES5 code handled decimal and hexadecimal number formats well but octal form wasn't specified, and was actively disallowed in strict mode. ES6 has added a new format, adding an 'o' after the initial 0 to declare the number an octal. They've also added a binary format.
Number( 29 ) // 29
Number( 035 ) // 35 in old octal form.
Number( 0o35 ) // 29 in new octal form
Number( 0x1d ) // 29 in hexadecimal
Number( 0b11101 ) // 29 in binary form
And Much More…
There is much, much more that ES6 offers us to make our code cleaner, shorter, easier to read and more robust. I aim to write a continuation of this article covering the less well known bits of ES6.
If you can’t wait that long, have a read of Kyle Simpson’s You Don’t Know JS book on ES6 or check out this brilliant little website!
Top comments (22)
In console I have: "Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token." (row#2 => job.company:...)
function es6({ age, name, job.company: company}) {
var yearOfBirth = 2018 - age,
console.log(
);
}
That's because of the comma at the end of the assignment.
The code sample for Dynamic Property Names is incorrect:
On line 3, you use an
=symbol instead of the:operator.Thanks for pointing that out. All changed now
Theres so many 'little' things here I have seen in my senior developers code that I've never been able to wrap my head around! Thanks so much for sharing!
It's great when you learn a new thing and then suddenly understand how a bit of code works. Hopefully you can now write code more like a senior developer!
Nice article, nicely summary of ES6 Tips and Tricks. The for has a typo.
Correct one:
Thanks, I must have been on auto pilot!
2 typos:
Change the ":" at job assigment to "=" and escape all single quotes inside the var a or use double quotes starting/finishing.
Thanks, the dev.to community is so observant
You have a tiny misspelling
function foo() {
return {
name: 'Anna',
age: 56,
job: { company: 'Tesco', title: 'Manager' }
};
}
// pre ES6
let a = foo(), name = a.name, *****age = name.age*****, company = a.job.company;
// ES6 destructuring and concise parameters
let { name, age, job.company: company} = foo();
Thanks for pointing it out.
Great ES-6 features explanation. I've found typo:
function foo(a, b, c) { console.log(
a=${a}, b=${b}, c=${c}}let data = [5, 15, 2];
foo( ...data); // a=5, b=15, c=2
There is a missing closing bracket of console.log()
Thanks for pointing that out. I hope you enjoyed the post beside the typos
Not to be mean, as I understand you probably wrote this in a short time, but there are a hell of a lot of errors in this. I'd love to edit it for you when I have time, if you'd like.
If you would like to, that would be amazing.
Really nice little Tutorial. You always went directly to the main point. I saw many tutorials that looks like a philosophical stuff...
Thanks. That's what I've been aiming for. There are so many books and sites out there explaining the exact mechanics and all possible variations but that doesn't help many people.
Is there another topic you think I should try to tackle?
Thanks Alex, I'll change it now.
can you please share the color scheme you used for python notebook? thanks :)
The colour scheme here is the one that Dev.to use with their markdown compiler. You'd have to ask them
Yeah I saw that too. There should be console.log(c) because b is still [1,2,3,4];
P.S. Awesome article from Author.