A spooky tale of building NecroPipeline - an autonomous CI/CD self-healing system powered by AI that brings failed pipelines back from the dead
🌙 The Haunting Problem
Picture this: It's 2 AM. You're deep in flow state, crafting beautiful code. Your fingers dance across the keyboard. You commit, you push, and then... 💀
"Build Failed."
Your heart sinks. The dreaded red X appears in your GitHub Actions. Now you're context-switching from creative coding into detective mode, scrolling through hundreds of lines of cryptic logs, hunting for that one error buried somewhere between line 847 and 1,203.
Sound familiar?
I've been there. We've all been there. And here's the truly haunting part: research shows that 80% of pipeline failures are just variations of problems we've seen before. Missing semicolons. Dependency conflicts. Incorrect test assertions. The same ghosts, haunting us over and over again.
Engineers spend 20-30% of their time debugging these failures instead of building features. That's roughly one day per week lost to the graveyard of broken builds.
I thought to myself: "What if pipelines could resurrect themselves?"
And that's when the spirits whispered an idea that would become NecroPipeline 🎃
🧙♂️ Enter Kiroween: Where Magic Meets Code
Right around Halloween, I discovered something special: Kiroween - a hackathon event by Kiro AI that challenged developers to build spooky-themed projects using AI IDE. The timing couldn't have been more perfect. I had this wild idea about autonomous pipeline resurrection, and Kiro AI was offering exactly the kind of intelligent coding partner I needed to bring it to life.
For those unfamiliar, Kiro is an AI-powered IDE that doesn't just autocomplete your code - it understands your entire project. It can read your architecture, comprehend your requirements, and help you build complex systems with the kind of intelligence that feels almost... supernatural. 👻
The Kiroween event gave me the perfect excuse to dive deep and build something ambitious. Plus, who doesn't love a good Halloween-themed coding challenge?
🎃 The Vision: An AI Necromancer for Dead Pipelines
Here's what I wanted to build:
When a GitHub Actions pipeline fails:
- Automatically detect the failure (no human needed)
- Download and analyze the logs using AI
- Generate a precise fix for the problem
- Create a pull request with the fix
- Resurrect the pipeline from the dead
All of this happening autonomously, while I sleep, code, or enjoy my coffee. The pipeline necromancer working tirelessly in the shadows.
And of course, it needed a properly spooky interface - dark themes, tombstone animations, ghostly notifications. Because if you're going to resurrect dead code, you might as well do it with style. 💀
🛠️ Building with Kiro: The Intelligent Approach
The Spec-Driven Resurrection
One of Kiro's most powerful features is its Spec system - a structured way to design and build complex features. Instead of diving straight into code, I started by creating a comprehensive specification document with Kiro's help.
I told Kiro: "I want to build an autonomous CI/CD self-healing system that detects failed pipelines, analyzes them with AI, and creates pull requests with fixes."
Kiro didn't just nod and start generating random code. Instead, it helped me think through:
- Requirements: What exactly should each component do?
- Architecture: How should the system be structured?
- Edge cases: What could go wrong?
- Testing strategy: How do we validate this works?
Together, we created a detailed requirements document with 12 user stories, each with specific acceptance criteria. This became my north star throughout development.
**User Story:** As a developer, I want the system to automatically
detect when my GitHub Actions pipelines fail, so that I can be
notified immediately without manual monitoring.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
1. WHEN a GitHub Actions workflow fails, THE Pipeline Monitor
SHALL receive the failure event within 60 seconds
2. WHEN a failure event is received, THE Pipeline Monitor SHALL
extract the workflow name, repository, commit SHA, and failure
timestamp
...
This spec-driven approach saved me from countless hours of refactoring later. Kiro kept me honest, reminding me of requirements I'd defined when I was tempted to take shortcuts.
🧩 The Architecture: Five Spirits Working in Harmony
With Kiro's guidance, I designed a modular architecture with five core components:
GitHub Actions → Monitor → Parser → AI Generator → Automator → Dashboard
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
SQLite Database (The Crypt)
1. The Watcher (Pipeline Monitor)
Listens for GitHub webhook events when workflows fail. Like a vigilant ghost, always watching, never sleeping.
2. The Interpreter (Log Parser)
Downloads failure logs and extracts the crucial details - error messages, stack traces, file paths. Uses regex patterns to categorize failures into seven types: test failures, syntax errors, dependency issues, linting violations, timeouts, missing environment variables, and the dreaded "unknown."
3. The Necromancer (AI Fix Generator)
This is where the real magic happens. Using Google Gemini AI, it analyzes the failure context and generates precise code fixes. But here's the clever part...
4. The Scribe (PR Automator)
Takes the generated fix, creates a new branch, applies the patches, and opens a pull request with detailed explanations. All automatically.
5. The Oracle (Resurrection Dashboard)
A beautiful, spooky-themed React interface showing real-time resurrection progress with WebSocket updates, animated tombstones, and ghostly statistics.
🎯 The Breakthrough: Intelligent Context Building
Here's where things got really interesting, and where Kiro's intelligence proved invaluable.
My first attempt at AI fix generation failed spectacularly. I was sending the AI everything - every file in the repository. This caused two problems:
- Token limit explosions - I'd hit API limits constantly
- Diluted context - The AI couldn't focus on what mattered
The AI would generate beautiful explanations of the problem but return empty patch arrays. No actual fixes. Just analysis paralysis.
I spent six hours debugging this mystery. Kiro helped me trace through the entire flow, and we discovered the issue: I was fetching configuration files and READMEs, but not the actual source code that needed fixing!
The solution? Intelligent context building with relevance scoring.
With Kiro's help, I built a scoring algorithm:
Relevance Score =
100 points (file mentioned in error message) +
80 points (file appears in stack trace) +
70 points (file directly affected by failure) +
60 points (configuration file like package.json) +
50 points (test file for test failures) +
40 points (file in same directory as affected files)
The system now selects the top 8 most relevant files, fetches their contents (truncated at 500 lines), and constructs a laser-focused context window. The AI gets exactly what it needs - nothing more, nothing less.
Result? Fix accuracy jumped to 85%+ on the first attempt. 🎉
Kiro was instrumental here. When I explained the problem, it didn't just suggest a solution - it helped me think through the scoring algorithm, implement it cleanly, and test it thoroughly. It's like pair programming with someone who never gets tired and has read every programming book ever written.
🎨 The Spooky UI: Making Resurrection Beautiful
Building the dashboard was pure joy. I wanted something that felt like a necromancer's control panel - dark, mysterious, but also professional enough for real teams to use.
Kiro helped me implement:
- Animated tombstones that crack open when resurrection begins
- Real-time WebSocket updates showing live progress
- Ghostly statistics with success rates and leaderboards
- Dual themes - toggle between "Spooky Mode" and "Professional Mode"
- Confidence scoring showing how certain the AI is about each fix
.tombstone {
animation: crack-open 0.5s ease-out;
filter: drop-shadow(0 0 10px rgba(138, 43, 226, 0.5));
}
.resurrection-success {
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #667eea 0%, #764ba2 100%);
animation: pulse 2s infinite;
}
The best part? When a pipeline successfully resurrects, you get a spooky notification:
"🎃 The spirits have spoken! Pipeline risen from the dead in 23 seconds."
🧪 The Testing Graveyard: Validating the Magic
Testing an autonomous AI system is... interesting. How do you test something that's supposed to fix problems automatically?
With Kiro's help, I created four demonstration repositories:
- lint-demo: Intentional ESLint violations
- test-demo: Failing test assertions
- syntax-demo: Missing semicolons and brackets
- simple-demo: Dependency errors
I'd push broken code, then watch NecroPipeline spring to life:
🎃 Pipeline Monitor receives webhook
📋 Event queued: workflow_run failed
🧙 Log Parser analyzing failure logs...
📜 Error found: Cannot find module 'lodash'
🏷️ Categorized as: dependency_error
✨ Fix Generator crafting resurrection spell...
🔮 AI analyzing error context...
📝 Generated fix for package.json
💯 Confidence: 0.95
🌿 Creating branch: necro-fix-1702345678
📤 Committing fix to branch
🎯 Creating pull request...
✅ PR Created: #123
Average resurrection time: 25 seconds from failure to pull request. 🚀
Kiro was particularly helpful in setting up property-based testing with fast-check, ensuring the system handled edge cases gracefully:
// Property: For any log containing error markers,
// extraction should find at least one error
fc.assert(fc.property(
logWithErrorArbitrary(),
(log) => {
const errors = extractErrorMessage(log);
expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
}
), { numRuns: 100 });
🎓 What I Learned: Wisdom from the Crypt
1. Context Quality > Model Size
An AI with the right 2,000 tokens outperforms one with 10,000 tokens of irrelevant code. Curation matters more than quantity.
2. Resilience is Non-Negotiable
When building autonomous systems, you need:
- Exponential backoff retry logic
- Circuit breakers to prevent cascade failures
- Error isolation so one failure doesn't block others
- Dead letter queues for persistently failing events
Kiro helped me implement all of these patterns correctly the first time.
3. Real-Time Feedback Builds Trust
The WebSocket dashboard showing live resurrection progress was crucial. Seeing the AI's reasoning process, confidence scores, and step-by-step actions builds user confidence. Transparency matters.
4. Specs Save Time
Starting with a detailed specification document (with Kiro's help) saved me from countless hours of refactoring. When you know exactly what you're building and why, implementation becomes straightforward.
5. AI Pair Programming is Transformative
Working with Kiro felt like having a senior engineer looking over my shoulder - one who never gets tired, never judges, and has infinite patience for explaining complex concepts. It's not about replacing developers; it's about amplifying what we can build.
🏆 The Kiroween Victory: What Made It Special
Kiroween wasn't just a hackathon - it was a celebration of what's possible when you combine human creativity with AI intelligence.
What made NecroPipeline stand out:
✅ End-to-end autonomous functionality - Not just a proof-of-concept, but a production-ready system
✅ Proven performance metrics - 85%+ fix accuracy, 25-second average resurrection time
✅ Real-world validation - Tested across multiple repositories and failure types
✅ Technical excellence - Comprehensive TypeScript typing, modular architecture, resilience patterns
✅ Spooky polish - A genuinely fun, themed interface that doesn't sacrifice professionalism
But more than the technical achievements, what I'm proudest of is the validation moment - watching NecroPipeline execute its first complete autonomous resurrection. Seeing it detect a real failure, analyze the logs, reason through the problem, generate a correct fix, and open a pull request - all while I just observed - was genuinely magical. 🪄
🙏 Thank You, Kiroween
Kiroween gave me the perfect excuse to build something ambitious, spooky, and genuinely useful. The event celebrated creativity, technical excellence, and the magic that happens when humans and AI work together.
To the Kiro team: Thank you for creating tools that make us better developers. Thank you for Kiroween. And thank you for believing that the future of coding is collaborative, not competitive.
To fellow developers: If you haven't tried building with AI assistance yet, I encourage you to explore it. Not because it's trendy, but because it genuinely makes you more productive and lets you tackle problems you might have thought were too complex.
🌟 The Moral of This Spooky Tale
Pipeline failures don't have to be scary. With the right tools, the right architecture, and a little AI magic, we can build systems that heal themselves.
80% of pipeline failures are predictable. We have the technology to handle them autonomously. The question isn't "Can we build self-healing infrastructure?" - NecroPipeline proves we can.
The question is: "When will self-healing become the industry standard?"
I believe that future is closer than we think. And it's going to be built by developers like us, armed with AI partners like Kiro, tackling problems that once seemed impossible.
May your pipelines never die, and if they do, may they rise again! 🎃👻
Drop them in the comments below! I'd love to hear about your experiences with CI/CD automation and AI-assisted development. 👇
Top comments (0)