📦 Turborepo vs. Regular Repos: When It Helps — and When It’s Overkill
Modern JS/TS projects often grow into multiple packages — maybe a backend, a frontend, shared UI components, and utilities. At that point you face a choice:
➡️ Stick to separate repos (or a basic monorepo)
➡️ Add tooling like Turborepo
Let’s break down what you gain (and lose) with each.
🌐 What Regular Repos / Basic Monorepos Look Like
With multiple separate repos (or a raw monorepo without tooling), each package manages its own:
- Build scripts
- Testing
- Dependency installs
- CI pipelines
- Versioning
Pros
- Simple mental model
- Lower setup cost
- Works for small teams / small projects
- No new tooling required
Cons
- Repeated installs (
npm installeverywhere) - Repeated builds
- Harder to share common code
- CI takes longer
- Coordination pain when projects depend on each other
This setup tends to break down once people start reusing internal components or libraries.
⚡ What Turborepo Brings to the Table
Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript/TypeScript monorepos with features like:
✔ Caching — skip repeated builds/tests
✔ Parallel execution — run tasks across packages
✔ Remote cache (Vercel) — great for teams
✔ Pipeline orchestration — define dependencies (build → test → lint)
✔ Zero config for common setups (Next.js, React, etc.)
That means:
-
buildbecomes fast - CI stops wasting cycles doing repeated work
- Local iteration improves a lot when switching branches
👨👩👧 Team & Scale — The Key Decision
Where Turborepo shines:
- Multiple apps + shared UI libs
- Long CI pipelines
- Teams with 3+ engineers
- Repeated tasks between packages
- Next.js projects (native support is great)
- Component libraries
- Microfrontends / microservices
Example setups that benefit:
- dashboard + marketing + shared-ui
- backend + frontend + shared-types
- API + worker + CLI + shared config
💥 Where Turborepo Is Overkill
This is the part people underestimate.
Turborepo is too heavy if:
- You have just one app
- No shared components/libs
- Builds/tests are already fast
- CI cost isn’t a pain point
- Solo developer moving fast
Also overkill if:
- You don’t plan for growth
- You don’t need cross-repo orchestration
- You don’t care about remote caching
Example scenario:
"React frontend + basic Node backend with no shared code"
You can run it as two repos or a single folder without tooling and life is fine.
🔧 Dev Productivity Angle
| Criteria | Regular Repos | Turborepo |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Complexity | ⭐ Easy | ⚠️ Medium |
| Scaling | 😬 Painful | ⭐ Excellent |
| CI Time | Slow | Fast |
| Dev Experience | Basic | Polished |
| Learning Curve | Low | Low-Medium |
| Tooling Overhead | None | Some |
| Team Benefit | Low | High |
📈 When It Starts Feeling Worth It
If you start hitting these symptoms:
- Duplicate dependencies
- “Why is CI so slow?”
- “Build is taking forever”
- Shared types between backend/frontend
- Releasing packages becomes manual work
Then Turborepo feels like turning on a cheat code.
📝 Final Take
Use Turborepo if:
You care about DX + CI performance + shared workspace between multiple packages.
Skip it if:
You’re building solo, have a single app, or don’t feel coordination pain yet.
Tools should remove friction — not add ceremony.
Top comments (0)